{"title":"Sarah Esther Lageson, Digital Punishment: Privacy, Stigma, and the Harms of Data-Driven Criminal Justice","authors":"M. Comfort","doi":"10.1177/14624745211027272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sarah Esther Lageson ’ s Digital Punishment: Privacy, Stigma, and the Harms of Data-Driven Criminal Justice is a deeply illuminating, profoundly important, and urgently communicated book drawing on years of empirical study and case law research to excavate the murky and maddening labyrinth of online criminal records. Lageson expertly demonstrates that the proliferation and commodi fi cation of technology-driven recordkeeping has exponentially expanded the ways in which people can be shamed, sur-veilled, punished, and fi nancially and emotionally devastated. As usual in American life, the majority of people targeted for these abuses are Black and brown, and do not have the requisite forms of political, social or economic capital to inoculate them from the poten-tially dire rami fi cations of an encounter with the police and its sequelae. In the tradition of Michael Tonry ’ s (1995) treatment in his classic book Malign Neglect of the “ tough on crime ” policies of the 1980s and 90 s, Digital Punishment lays bare the inherently racist and fundamentally unethical practices of capturing, selling, publicizing, and priori-tizing information generated by an astonishingly convoluted and egregiously damaging system. The fi rst part of Digital Punishment explores the production and dissemination of digital records documenting police stops, court hearings, community supervision or incarceration sentences, and other forms of contact with the criminal legal system. Lageson deftly leads readers through the thicket of disjointed practices, overworked government employees, public databases, private brokers, barely regulated markets, fervent “ digilantes, ” and exploitative pro fi teers that generate, commodify, and broadcast these data. We learn why rhetoric about the importance of transparency has superseded rights to privacy, how errors with life-altering consequences are routinely introduced and reproduced by staff who are undertrained for and relatively unconcerned with data management, and that harvesting, repackaging, and selling","PeriodicalId":47626,"journal":{"name":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","volume":"24 1","pages":"748 - 750"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/14624745211027272","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Punishment & Society-International Journal of Penology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745211027272","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
Abstract
Sarah Esther Lageson ’ s Digital Punishment: Privacy, Stigma, and the Harms of Data-Driven Criminal Justice is a deeply illuminating, profoundly important, and urgently communicated book drawing on years of empirical study and case law research to excavate the murky and maddening labyrinth of online criminal records. Lageson expertly demonstrates that the proliferation and commodi fi cation of technology-driven recordkeeping has exponentially expanded the ways in which people can be shamed, sur-veilled, punished, and fi nancially and emotionally devastated. As usual in American life, the majority of people targeted for these abuses are Black and brown, and do not have the requisite forms of political, social or economic capital to inoculate them from the poten-tially dire rami fi cations of an encounter with the police and its sequelae. In the tradition of Michael Tonry ’ s (1995) treatment in his classic book Malign Neglect of the “ tough on crime ” policies of the 1980s and 90 s, Digital Punishment lays bare the inherently racist and fundamentally unethical practices of capturing, selling, publicizing, and priori-tizing information generated by an astonishingly convoluted and egregiously damaging system. The fi rst part of Digital Punishment explores the production and dissemination of digital records documenting police stops, court hearings, community supervision or incarceration sentences, and other forms of contact with the criminal legal system. Lageson deftly leads readers through the thicket of disjointed practices, overworked government employees, public databases, private brokers, barely regulated markets, fervent “ digilantes, ” and exploitative pro fi teers that generate, commodify, and broadcast these data. We learn why rhetoric about the importance of transparency has superseded rights to privacy, how errors with life-altering consequences are routinely introduced and reproduced by staff who are undertrained for and relatively unconcerned with data management, and that harvesting, repackaging, and selling
Sarah Esther Lageson的《数字惩罚:隐私、污名和数据驱动刑事司法的危害》是一本极具启发性、极其重要且急需交流的书,该书借鉴了多年的实证研究和判例法研究,挖掘了网络犯罪记录中阴暗而令人抓狂的迷宫。Lageson熟练地证明,技术驱动的记录保存的扩散和商品化已经成倍地扩大了人们受到羞辱、监视、惩罚以及财务和情感打击的方式。在美国生活中,像往常一样,这些虐待行为的目标人群大多是黑人和棕色人种,他们没有必要的政治、社会或经济资本来保护他们免受与警察及其后遗症的潜在可怕后果的伤害。Michael Tonry(1995)在其经典著作《恶意忽视20世纪80年代和90年代的“严厉打击犯罪”政策》中对其进行了传统的处理,《数字惩罚》揭露了捕捉、销售、宣传和先验信息的固有种族主义和根本不道德的做法,这些信息是由一个令人惊讶的复杂和极具破坏性的系统产生的。数字惩罚的第一部分探讨了数字记录的制作和传播,这些记录记录了警察拦截、法庭听证会、社区监督或监禁判决,以及与刑事法律系统的其他形式的接触。Lageson巧妙地带领读者了解了错综复杂的脱节做法、过度劳累的政府雇员、公共数据库、私人经纪人、几乎没有监管的市场、狂热的“挖掘者”以及生成、商品化和传播这些数据的剥削者。我们了解到,为什么关于透明度重要性的言论已经取代了隐私权,那些对数据管理培训不足且相对不关心数据管理的员工如何经常引入和复制具有改变生活后果的错误,以及收集、重新包装和销售
期刊介绍:
Punishment & Society is an international, interdisciplinary, peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research and scholarship dealing with punishment, penal institutions and penal control.