{"title":"Does recognition versus disclosure of pension liabilities affect credit ratings? Evidence from Japan","authors":"Masaki Kusano","doi":"10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2023.100524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Whether credit market participants process disclosure and recognition of pension information differently has not been fully explored. To fill this gap, this study investigates whether the change in a pension accounting standard related to the recognition rule influences firms’ credit risk in Japan. Statement No. 26, <em>Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits</em>, stipulates that firms recognize previously disclosed pension information on the balance sheet. Employing the implementation of Statement No. 26, I explore how differences between disclosed and recognized pension liabilities affect credit ratings. I find that off–balance sheet pension liabilities are associated with credit ratings prior to Statement No. 26. I also find similar relations between disclosure versus recognition of pension liabilities and credit ratings. When firms have a small pension plan deficit, off–balance sheet pension liabilities provide risk-relevant information, and the risk relevance of disclosed and recognized pension liabilities is statistically similar. My overall results suggest that mandating pension recognition does not affect the credit risk assessment by credit rating agencies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":53221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Accounting Auditing and Taxation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1061951823000034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Whether credit market participants process disclosure and recognition of pension information differently has not been fully explored. To fill this gap, this study investigates whether the change in a pension accounting standard related to the recognition rule influences firms’ credit risk in Japan. Statement No. 26, Accounting Standard for Retirement Benefits, stipulates that firms recognize previously disclosed pension information on the balance sheet. Employing the implementation of Statement No. 26, I explore how differences between disclosed and recognized pension liabilities affect credit ratings. I find that off–balance sheet pension liabilities are associated with credit ratings prior to Statement No. 26. I also find similar relations between disclosure versus recognition of pension liabilities and credit ratings. When firms have a small pension plan deficit, off–balance sheet pension liabilities provide risk-relevant information, and the risk relevance of disclosed and recognized pension liabilities is statistically similar. My overall results suggest that mandating pension recognition does not affect the credit risk assessment by credit rating agencies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation publishes articles which deal with most areas of international accounting including auditing, taxation and management accounting. The journal''s goal is to bridge the gap between academic researchers and practitioners by publishing papers that are relevant to the development of the field of accounting. Submissions are expected to make a contribution to the accounting literature, including as appropriate the international accounting literature typically found in JIAAT and other primary US-based international accounting journals as well as in leading European accounting journals. Applied research findings, critiques of current accounting practices and the measurement of their effects on business decisions, general purpose solutions to problems through models, and essays on world affairs which affect accounting practice are all within the scope of the journal.