Characterization of Trapezial Pommel in Relation to Radiographic and Wear Patterns in Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis.

The Hand Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-01 DOI:10.1177/15589447221093670
Alexandra T Bourdillon, Lauren Shapiro, Faes D Kerkhof, Nicole A Segovia, Arnold-Peter Weiss, Amy L Ladd
{"title":"Characterization of Trapezial Pommel in Relation to Radiographic and Wear Patterns in Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis.","authors":"Alexandra T Bourdillon, Lauren Shapiro, Faes D Kerkhof, Nicole A Segovia, Arnold-Peter Weiss, Amy L Ladd","doi":"10.1177/15589447221093670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trapezial pommel, or ulnar osteophyte positioned at the vertex of the saddle-shaped facet, is a consistent structural appearance in osteoarthritis (OA) of the first carpometacarpal. This study investigates its relation to radiographic measures (modified Eaton staging and thumb OA [ThOA] index) and wear patterns (trapezial surface morphology and cartilaginous eburnation).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In all, 137 whole trapezia were explanted from 116 patients and evaluated for Eaton staging, morphology (saddle, cirque, or dish), and eburnation (degree of cartilaginous effacement) of the articular surface of the trapezium. In total, 131 Robert's views and 126 stress views were reviewed by 2 blinded senior surgeons for ThOA index and pommel size. Statistical analyses included Spearman correlation and linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Standardized pommel size achieved good intrarater reliability (correlation coefficient: 0.80-0.98) and moderate interrater reliability (correlation coefficient: 0.60-0.67). The ThOA index and pommel size were significantly correlated across Robert's (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.51) and stress views (<i>r</i><sub>s</sub> = 0.64). The ThOA index better distinguished between stages compared with pommel size. All the radiographic measures inversely correlated with preserved cartilage and varied across morphologies. Pommel size differed significantly between dish and saddle, and the ThOA index was significantly different between all morphologies when using stress views.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We reliably quantified the pommel feature and demonstrated significant correlations with other radiographic and topologic measures of arthritic disease. If future studies can demonstrate that the pommel is a pathogenic process in ThOA and its correction can curb disease progression, the identification of the pommel feature may help guide targeted intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":76630,"journal":{"name":"The Hand","volume":"1 1","pages":"1291-1299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10617472/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Hand","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447221093670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trapezial pommel, or ulnar osteophyte positioned at the vertex of the saddle-shaped facet, is a consistent structural appearance in osteoarthritis (OA) of the first carpometacarpal. This study investigates its relation to radiographic measures (modified Eaton staging and thumb OA [ThOA] index) and wear patterns (trapezial surface morphology and cartilaginous eburnation).

Methods: In all, 137 whole trapezia were explanted from 116 patients and evaluated for Eaton staging, morphology (saddle, cirque, or dish), and eburnation (degree of cartilaginous effacement) of the articular surface of the trapezium. In total, 131 Robert's views and 126 stress views were reviewed by 2 blinded senior surgeons for ThOA index and pommel size. Statistical analyses included Spearman correlation and linear regression.

Results: Standardized pommel size achieved good intrarater reliability (correlation coefficient: 0.80-0.98) and moderate interrater reliability (correlation coefficient: 0.60-0.67). The ThOA index and pommel size were significantly correlated across Robert's (rs = 0.51) and stress views (rs = 0.64). The ThOA index better distinguished between stages compared with pommel size. All the radiographic measures inversely correlated with preserved cartilage and varied across morphologies. Pommel size differed significantly between dish and saddle, and the ThOA index was significantly different between all morphologies when using stress views.

Conclusions: We reliably quantified the pommel feature and demonstrated significant correlations with other radiographic and topologic measures of arthritic disease. If future studies can demonstrate that the pommel is a pathogenic process in ThOA and its correction can curb disease progression, the identification of the pommel feature may help guide targeted intervention.

腕足类骨关节炎的梯形鞍部特征与放射学和磨损模式的关系。
背景:位于鞍形小面顶点的梯形鞍部或尺骨骨骨赘是第一腕掌骨关节炎(OA)的一致结构外观。本研究探讨了其与放射学测量(改良Eaton分期和拇指OA[ThOA]指数)和磨损模式(斜方肌表面形态和软骨再生)的关系,以及梯形的关节表面的再造(软骨消失的程度)。总的来说,131个Robert的观点和126个压力观点由2名失明的高级外科医生对ThOA指数和鞍部大小进行了审查。统计分析包括斯皮尔曼相关和线性回归。结果标准化鞍部大小获得了良好的评分者内可靠性(相关系数:0.80-0.98)和中等的评分者间可靠性(相关性系数:0.60-0.67)。ThOA指数和鞍部大小在Robert’s(rs=0.51)和压力观(rs=0.64)之间显著相关。与鞍部大小相比,ThOA指数更好地区分不同阶段。所有的影像学测量都与保存的软骨呈负相关,并且在不同的形态上有所不同。当使用应力视图时,盘形和鞍形之间的果脯大小显著不同,并且所有形态之间的ThOA指数显著不同。结论我们可靠地量化了关节炎的鞍部特征,并证明了与其他关节炎疾病的放射学和拓扑测量的显著相关性。如果未来的研究能够证明鞍部是ThOA的致病过程,并且其矫正可以抑制疾病进展,那么鞍部特征的识别可能有助于指导有针对性的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信