{"title":"Philosophical Anthropology and the Interpersonal Theory of the Affect of Shame","authors":"Matthew Rukgaber","doi":"10.1163/15691624-12341338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that shame is fundamentally interpersonal. It is opposed to the leading interpretation of shame in the field of moral psychology, which is the cognitivist, morally rationally, autonomous view of shame as a negative judgment about the self. That view of shame abandons the social and interpersonal essence of shame. I will advance the idea, as developed by the tradition of philosophical anthropology and, in particular, in the works of Helmuth Plessner, Erwin Straus, F. J. J. Buytendijk, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, that shame is a heteronomous affective response that is caused by a breakdown in our fundamental interpersonal connection with others. It is a feeling that comes from the denial of our basic need to live with others in a state of trusting acceptance.","PeriodicalId":35562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Phenomenological Psychology","volume":"49 1","pages":"83-112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15691624-12341338","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Phenomenological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15691624-12341338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
This article argues that shame is fundamentally interpersonal. It is opposed to the leading interpretation of shame in the field of moral psychology, which is the cognitivist, morally rationally, autonomous view of shame as a negative judgment about the self. That view of shame abandons the social and interpersonal essence of shame. I will advance the idea, as developed by the tradition of philosophical anthropology and, in particular, in the works of Helmuth Plessner, Erwin Straus, F. J. J. Buytendijk, and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, that shame is a heteronomous affective response that is caused by a breakdown in our fundamental interpersonal connection with others. It is a feeling that comes from the denial of our basic need to live with others in a state of trusting acceptance.
本文认为羞耻本质上是人际关系。它与道德心理学领域对羞耻感的主流解释相反,后者是认知主义的、道德理性的、自主的羞耻感观点,认为羞耻感是对自我的消极判断。这种羞耻感的观点抛弃了羞耻感的社会和人际本质。我将推进由哲学人类学传统,特别是Helmuth Plessner、Erwin Straus、F. J. J. Buytendijk和Maurice Merleau-Ponty的作品发展起来的观点,即羞耻是一种他律的情感反应,是由我们与他人基本人际关系的破裂引起的。这种感觉来自于我们拒绝与他人在信任和接纳的状态下生活的基本需要。
期刊介绍:
The peer-reviewed Journal of Phenomenological Psychology publishes articles that advance the discipline of psychology from the perspective of the Continental phenomenology movement. Within that tradition, phenomenology is understood in the broadest possible sense including its transcendental, existential, hermeneutic, and narrative strands and is not meant to convey the thought of any one individual. Articles advance the discipline of psychology by applying phenomenology to enhance the field’s philosophical foundations, critical reflection, theoretical development, research methodologies, empirical research, and applications in such areas as clinical, educational, and organizational psychology.