Another Cinema

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Hayley O’Malley
{"title":"Another Cinema","authors":"Hayley O’Malley","doi":"10.7227/jbr.7.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"James Baldwin was a vocal critic of Hollywood, but he was also a cinephile, and his critique of film was not so much of the medium itself, but of the uses to which it was put. Baldwin saw in film the chance to transform both politics and art—if only film could be transformed itself. This essay blends readings of archival materials, literature, film, and print culture to examine three distinct modes in Baldwin’s ongoing quest to revolutionize film. First, I argue, literature served as a key site to practice being a filmmaker, as Baldwin adapted cinematic grammars in his fiction and frequently penned scenes of filmgoing in which he could, in effect, direct his own movies. Secondly, I show that starting in the 1960s, Baldwin took a more direct route to making movies, as he composed screenplays, formed several production companies, and attempted to work in both Hollywood and the independent film scene in Europe. Finally, I explore how Baldwin sought to change cinema as a performer himself, in particular during his collaboration on Dick Fontaine and Pat Hartley’s documentary I Heard It Through the Grapevine (1982). This little-known film follows Baldwin as he revisits key sites from the civil rights movement and reconnects with activist friends as he endeavors to construct a revisionist history of race in America and to develop a media practice capable of honoring Black communities.","PeriodicalId":36467,"journal":{"name":"James Baldwin Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"James Baldwin Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/jbr.7.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

James Baldwin was a vocal critic of Hollywood, but he was also a cinephile, and his critique of film was not so much of the medium itself, but of the uses to which it was put. Baldwin saw in film the chance to transform both politics and art—if only film could be transformed itself. This essay blends readings of archival materials, literature, film, and print culture to examine three distinct modes in Baldwin’s ongoing quest to revolutionize film. First, I argue, literature served as a key site to practice being a filmmaker, as Baldwin adapted cinematic grammars in his fiction and frequently penned scenes of filmgoing in which he could, in effect, direct his own movies. Secondly, I show that starting in the 1960s, Baldwin took a more direct route to making movies, as he composed screenplays, formed several production companies, and attempted to work in both Hollywood and the independent film scene in Europe. Finally, I explore how Baldwin sought to change cinema as a performer himself, in particular during his collaboration on Dick Fontaine and Pat Hartley’s documentary I Heard It Through the Grapevine (1982). This little-known film follows Baldwin as he revisits key sites from the civil rights movement and reconnects with activist friends as he endeavors to construct a revisionist history of race in America and to develop a media practice capable of honoring Black communities.
另一家电影院
詹姆斯·鲍德温是好莱坞的一位直言不讳的评论家,但他也是一位电影爱好者,他对电影的批评与其说是媒体本身,不如说是媒体的用途。鲍德温在电影中看到了改变政治和艺术的机会——只要电影本身能够改变就好了。这篇文章融合了对档案材料、文学、电影和印刷文化的解读,考察了鲍德温不断寻求电影革命的三种不同模式。首先,我认为,文学是一个练习成为电影制作人的关键场所,因为鲍德温在他的小说中改编了电影语法,并经常写下电影场景,在这些场景中,他实际上可以执导自己的电影。其次,我展示了从20世纪60年代开始,鲍德温采取了一条更直接的电影制作路线,他创作了电影剧本,成立了几家制片公司,并试图在好莱坞和欧洲的独立电影界工作。最后,我探讨了鲍德温作为一名演员是如何寻求改变电影的,特别是在他与迪克·方丹和帕特·哈特利的纪录片《我从葡萄藤里听到的》(1982)合作期间。这部鲜为人知的电影讲述了鲍德温重新访问民权运动的关键地点,并与活动家朋友重新联系的故事,他努力构建美国种族修正主义历史,并发展一种能够尊重黑人社区的媒体实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
James Baldwin Review
James Baldwin Review Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信