Jack London and George P. Brett (Macmillan): economics and ethics of “one of the greatest publisher-writer duos”

Ekaterina V. Kesharpu
{"title":"Jack London and George P. Brett (Macmillan): economics and ethics of “one of the greatest publisher-writer duos”","authors":"Ekaterina V. Kesharpu","doi":"10.22363/2312-9220-2022-27-4-706-715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research is devoted to the analysis of ethical and economic aspects of the relationship between Jack London and his major publisher, Macmillan President George P. Brett. Until recently, these relations, which are the brightest example of the synthesis of friendship and mutual benefit, were not the subject of a separate study. The influence of publishers, editors and the literary market as a whole on the writer’s creativity was also underestimated. The purpose of this study is to confirm the significant role of Brett in London’s writing career, who became not only a business partner for the writer, but also a friend and mentor. The relationship between the writer and the publisher is traced in a historical perspective, showing their changes as the writer’s career develops from a literary aspirant to a popular author, conflicts and contradictions, including those that resulted in London’s brief apostasy from Macmillan and a contract with Century. It is shown that many of London’s works, radical or different from the demands of the mass reader, such as The People of the Abyss, The Kempton - Wace Letters, The Iron Heel, The Road, Martin Eden, saw the light solely due to Brett’s liberalism. The firm intention of the writer to publish a significant number of works unclaimed in the literary market debunks the myth of Jack London as a commercial writer. On the other hand, it was precisely the generous and steady advances from Macmillan that gave London freedom for literary experiments, without which he would never have been able to go beyond the short story genre, as well as the “discourse of bargaining” was an integral part of this amazing friendship between writer and publisher.","PeriodicalId":32646,"journal":{"name":"RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUDN Journal of Studies in Literature and Journalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-9220-2022-27-4-706-715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research is devoted to the analysis of ethical and economic aspects of the relationship between Jack London and his major publisher, Macmillan President George P. Brett. Until recently, these relations, which are the brightest example of the synthesis of friendship and mutual benefit, were not the subject of a separate study. The influence of publishers, editors and the literary market as a whole on the writer’s creativity was also underestimated. The purpose of this study is to confirm the significant role of Brett in London’s writing career, who became not only a business partner for the writer, but also a friend and mentor. The relationship between the writer and the publisher is traced in a historical perspective, showing their changes as the writer’s career develops from a literary aspirant to a popular author, conflicts and contradictions, including those that resulted in London’s brief apostasy from Macmillan and a contract with Century. It is shown that many of London’s works, radical or different from the demands of the mass reader, such as The People of the Abyss, The Kempton - Wace Letters, The Iron Heel, The Road, Martin Eden, saw the light solely due to Brett’s liberalism. The firm intention of the writer to publish a significant number of works unclaimed in the literary market debunks the myth of Jack London as a commercial writer. On the other hand, it was precisely the generous and steady advances from Macmillan that gave London freedom for literary experiments, without which he would never have been able to go beyond the short story genre, as well as the “discourse of bargaining” was an integral part of this amazing friendship between writer and publisher.
杰克·伦敦和乔治·p·布雷特(麦克米伦出版社):“最伟大的出版商和作家组合之一”的经济学和伦理学
这项研究致力于分析杰克·伦敦和他的主要出版商麦克米伦出版社总裁乔治·p·布雷特之间的伦理和经济关系。这些关系是友谊与互利结合的最鲜明的例子,直到最近才成为单独研究的对象。出版商、编辑和整个文学市场对作家创造力的影响也被低估了。本研究的目的是确认布雷特在伦敦写作生涯中的重要作用,他不仅是作家的商业伙伴,也是作家的朋友和导师。作者和出版商之间的关系从历史的角度进行了追溯,展示了作家从一个有文学抱负的人到一个受欢迎的作家的职业发展过程中他们的变化,冲突和矛盾,包括导致伦敦短暂背叛麦克米伦和与世纪的合同。结果表明,伦敦的许多作品,如《深渊的人们》、《肯普顿-韦斯书信》、《铁蹄》、《路》、《马丁·伊登》等,都是由于布雷特的自由主义才得以见光的,这些作品要么激进,要么偏离了大众读者的要求。作家在文学市场上发表大量无人认领的作品的坚定意图揭穿了杰克·伦敦作为商业作家的神话。另一方面,正是麦克米伦慷慨而稳定的资助,给了伦敦文学实验的自由,没有这些资助,他就永远无法超越短篇小说的范畴,而且“讨价还价的话语”是作家和出版商之间令人惊叹的友谊的一个组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信