Comparison of Three Ventilation Rate Measurement Methods under Different Window Apertures in Winter and Spring

A. Tusi, T. Shimazu, M. Ochiai, Katsumi Suzuki
{"title":"Comparison of Three Ventilation Rate Measurement Methods under Different Window Apertures in Winter and Spring","authors":"A. Tusi, T. Shimazu, M. Ochiai, Katsumi Suzuki","doi":"10.2525/ECB.59.49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Real-time photosynthetic rate monitoring is crucial for managing crop cultivation in greenhouses. Nederhoff and Vegter (1994) accordingly presented a canopy photosynthesis measurement method that enabled the accurate estimation of the greenhouse CO2 balance. The photosynthesis of cultivated plants in a greenhouse is directly related to the ventilation rate, which also affects the air temperature and humidity. Takakura et al. (2017) proposed a method for directly estimating the canopy photosynthetic rate by introducing the ventilation rate, determined from the greenhouse environmental parameters, into the CO2 balance equation. The ventilation is very complex as it is the result of the heat transfer processes of conduction, convection, and radiation occurring in a naturally ventilated greenhouse. Additionally, the ventilation rate has been found to be influenced by the presence of crops as well as the structure and design of the greenhouse, and has been observed to constantly fluctuate throughout the day (Mashonjowa et al., 2010). Therefore, it is necessary to continuously measure the ventilation rate in greenhouses used for cultivation. Various ventilation rate measurement techniques have been studied extensively, such as the tracer gas (TG), heat balance (HB), and water vapor balance (WVB) methods. The TG and HB methods are the most widely adopted for greenhouse ventilation rate measurement (Fernandez and Bailey, 1992). In previous research, the TG method has exhibited highly accurate air exchange rate measurement under leakage conditions (i.e., with the window apertures closed) and with the smallest window apertures (Fernandez and Bailey, 1992; Nederhoff et al., 1985; Baptista et al., 1999; Muñoz et al., 1999). Other studies have shown that the HB method achieves high accuracy with larger window apertures (Fernandez and Bailey, 1992; Baptista et al., 2001). However, the WVB method was found to estimate the ventilation rate more accurately than the TG method with small window apertures (Boulard and Draoui, 1995) and has been applied in a greenhouse used to cultivate mature plants (Harmanto et al., 2006). It is important to note that the TG method is not suitable for long-term, continuous ventilation rate measurement (Sherman, 1990) because it requires that a considerable amount of the TG be present in a greenhouse under cultivation, and SF6, which is often used as a TG, is quite expensive. Meanwhile, the HB technique requires numerous variables to measure the ventilation rate even when it is possible to do so continuously (Baptista et al., 1999). There are also several challenges associated with the WVB method related to the i) direct measurement of the transpiration rate parameter using a lysimetric device (Kittas et al., 2002); ii) overestimation of the ventilation rate at night (Mashonjowa et al., 2010); and iii) evaluation of the error","PeriodicalId":85505,"journal":{"name":"Seibutsu kankyo chosetsu. [Environment control in biology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seibutsu kankyo chosetsu. [Environment control in biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2525/ECB.59.49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Real-time photosynthetic rate monitoring is crucial for managing crop cultivation in greenhouses. Nederhoff and Vegter (1994) accordingly presented a canopy photosynthesis measurement method that enabled the accurate estimation of the greenhouse CO2 balance. The photosynthesis of cultivated plants in a greenhouse is directly related to the ventilation rate, which also affects the air temperature and humidity. Takakura et al. (2017) proposed a method for directly estimating the canopy photosynthetic rate by introducing the ventilation rate, determined from the greenhouse environmental parameters, into the CO2 balance equation. The ventilation is very complex as it is the result of the heat transfer processes of conduction, convection, and radiation occurring in a naturally ventilated greenhouse. Additionally, the ventilation rate has been found to be influenced by the presence of crops as well as the structure and design of the greenhouse, and has been observed to constantly fluctuate throughout the day (Mashonjowa et al., 2010). Therefore, it is necessary to continuously measure the ventilation rate in greenhouses used for cultivation. Various ventilation rate measurement techniques have been studied extensively, such as the tracer gas (TG), heat balance (HB), and water vapor balance (WVB) methods. The TG and HB methods are the most widely adopted for greenhouse ventilation rate measurement (Fernandez and Bailey, 1992). In previous research, the TG method has exhibited highly accurate air exchange rate measurement under leakage conditions (i.e., with the window apertures closed) and with the smallest window apertures (Fernandez and Bailey, 1992; Nederhoff et al., 1985; Baptista et al., 1999; Muñoz et al., 1999). Other studies have shown that the HB method achieves high accuracy with larger window apertures (Fernandez and Bailey, 1992; Baptista et al., 2001). However, the WVB method was found to estimate the ventilation rate more accurately than the TG method with small window apertures (Boulard and Draoui, 1995) and has been applied in a greenhouse used to cultivate mature plants (Harmanto et al., 2006). It is important to note that the TG method is not suitable for long-term, continuous ventilation rate measurement (Sherman, 1990) because it requires that a considerable amount of the TG be present in a greenhouse under cultivation, and SF6, which is often used as a TG, is quite expensive. Meanwhile, the HB technique requires numerous variables to measure the ventilation rate even when it is possible to do so continuously (Baptista et al., 1999). There are also several challenges associated with the WVB method related to the i) direct measurement of the transpiration rate parameter using a lysimetric device (Kittas et al., 2002); ii) overestimation of the ventilation rate at night (Mashonjowa et al., 2010); and iii) evaluation of the error
冬春季不同开窗条件下三种通风量测量方法的比较
实时光合速率监测对于温室作物栽培管理至关重要。Nederhoff和Vetter(1994)因此提出了一种冠层光合作用测量方法,该方法能够准确估计温室CO2平衡。温室中栽培植物的光合作用与通风量直接相关,通风量也会影响空气的温度和湿度。Takakura等人(2017)提出了一种通过将由温室环境参数确定的通风率引入CO2平衡方程来直接估计冠层光合速率的方法。通风非常复杂,因为它是自然通风温室中发生的传导、对流和辐射热传递过程的结果。此外,还发现通风率受到作物的存在以及温室的结构和设计的影响,并在一天中不断波动(Mashonjowa等人,2010)。因此,有必要连续测量用于栽培的温室的通风率。各种通风率测量技术已被广泛研究,如示踪气体(TG)、热平衡(HB)和水蒸气平衡(WVB)方法。TG和HB方法是最广泛用于温室通风率测量的方法(Fernandez和Bailey,1992)。在之前的研究中,TG方法在泄漏条件下(即,关闭窗户孔径)和最小窗户孔径下显示出高度准确的空气交换率测量(Fernandez和Bailey,1992;Nederhoff等人,1985年;Baptista等人,1999年;Muñoz等人,99年)。其他研究表明,HB方法在较大的窗口孔径下实现了高精度(Fernandez和Bailey,1992;Baptista等人,2001年)。然而,发现WVB方法比具有小窗口的TG方法更准确地估计通风率(Boulard和Draoui,1995),并已应用于用于培养成熟植物的温室中(Harmanto等人,2006)。需要注意的是,TG方法不适用于长期、连续的通风率测量(Sherman,1990),因为它需要在栽培的温室中存在大量的TG,而经常用作TG的SF6非常昂贵。同时,HB技术需要许多变量来测量通气率,即使可以连续测量(Baptista等人,1999)。与WVB方法相关的还有几个挑战,涉及i)使用蒸渗仪直接测量蒸腾速率参数(Kittas等人,2002);ii)高估夜间通风率(Mashonjowa等人,2010);以及iii)误差评估
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信