Application of robotic surgery for paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair: a narrative review

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
T. Grenda, R. Reddy
{"title":"Application of robotic surgery for paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair: a narrative review","authors":"T. Grenda, R. Reddy","doi":"10.21037/vats-21-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objective: Paraesophageal hiatal hernia (PEH) repair has undergone evolution from open approaches (e.g., laparotomy, thoracotomy) to minimally-invasive techniques with laparoscopy. While the laparoscopic approach has offered decreased morbidity, issues related to PEH recurrence persist. As a result, there has been a continued need for innovation of PEH repair techniques to address recurrence. Increased uptake in robotic surgery has allowed for application of this technology to PEH repair. While increasing in adoption, the efficacy of robotic approach to PEH continues to undergo evaluation. Methods: We performed a review of randomized and non-randomized studies surrounding robotic-assisted PEH repair using PubMed/MEDLINE. We evaluated the literature across aspects pertaining to perioperative outcomes, long-term outcomes, and costs compared to traditional surgical approaches. There were no publication date restrictions. Key Content and Findings: Current literature suggests that robotic PEH repair is feasible and offers perioperative outcomes similar to standard laparoscopic approaches. Limited reports of long-term outcomes, specifically related to PEH recurrence and patient-reported outcomes, suggest the efficacy of robotic PEH repair. Initial cost comparisons with standard laparoscopic approaches demonstrate similar intraoperative costs, but are limited and continue to be evaluated. In addition, there is data suggesting robotic PEH repair may be applicable to large PEH (>30% intrathoracic stomach). Conclusions: Review of current literature suggests that robotic PEH repair is feasible and has similar perioperative outcomes when compared to standard laparoscopic techniques. The learning curve for transition from laparoscopic to robotic PEH repair needs to be considered, even among experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Future prospective multi-institutional studies will be needed in order to fully evaluate the value (quality/costs) of robotic PEH repair to ensure efficacious and cost-effective adoption.","PeriodicalId":42086,"journal":{"name":"Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/vats-21-44","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Objective: Paraesophageal hiatal hernia (PEH) repair has undergone evolution from open approaches (e.g., laparotomy, thoracotomy) to minimally-invasive techniques with laparoscopy. While the laparoscopic approach has offered decreased morbidity, issues related to PEH recurrence persist. As a result, there has been a continued need for innovation of PEH repair techniques to address recurrence. Increased uptake in robotic surgery has allowed for application of this technology to PEH repair. While increasing in adoption, the efficacy of robotic approach to PEH continues to undergo evaluation. Methods: We performed a review of randomized and non-randomized studies surrounding robotic-assisted PEH repair using PubMed/MEDLINE. We evaluated the literature across aspects pertaining to perioperative outcomes, long-term outcomes, and costs compared to traditional surgical approaches. There were no publication date restrictions. Key Content and Findings: Current literature suggests that robotic PEH repair is feasible and offers perioperative outcomes similar to standard laparoscopic approaches. Limited reports of long-term outcomes, specifically related to PEH recurrence and patient-reported outcomes, suggest the efficacy of robotic PEH repair. Initial cost comparisons with standard laparoscopic approaches demonstrate similar intraoperative costs, but are limited and continue to be evaluated. In addition, there is data suggesting robotic PEH repair may be applicable to large PEH (>30% intrathoracic stomach). Conclusions: Review of current literature suggests that robotic PEH repair is feasible and has similar perioperative outcomes when compared to standard laparoscopic techniques. The learning curve for transition from laparoscopic to robotic PEH repair needs to be considered, even among experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Future prospective multi-institutional studies will be needed in order to fully evaluate the value (quality/costs) of robotic PEH repair to ensure efficacious and cost-effective adoption.
机器人手术在食管裂孔疝修补中的应用综述
背景与目的:食管旁裂孔疝(PEH)的修复经历了从开放入路(如开腹、开胸)到微创腹腔镜技术的演变。虽然腹腔镜方法降低了发病率,但与PEH复发相关的问题仍然存在。因此,持续需要创新PEH修复技术来解决复发问题。机器人手术的增加使得这项技术可以应用于PEH修复。虽然越来越多的人采用,但机器人方法对PEH的疗效仍在进行评估。方法:我们使用PubMed/MEDLINE对机器人辅助PEH修复的随机和非随机研究进行了回顾。我们评估了与传统手术方法相比,围手术期结果、长期结果和成本等方面的文献。没有出版日期的限制。关键内容和发现:目前的文献表明机器人PEH修复是可行的,并且提供与标准腹腔镜方法相似的围手术期结果。有限的长期结果报告,特别是与PEH复发和患者报告的结果相关的报告,表明机器人PEH修复的有效性。与标准腹腔镜入路的初步成本比较显示术中成本相似,但存在局限性,需要继续评估。此外,有数据表明机器人PEH修复可能适用于大PEH(>30%胸内胃)。结论:回顾目前的文献表明,与标准腹腔镜技术相比,机器人PEH修复是可行的,并且具有相似的围手术期结果。从腹腔镜到机器人PEH修复的过渡需要考虑学习曲线,即使是经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生。为了充分评估机器人PEH修复的价值(质量/成本),以确保有效和经济地采用,未来的前瞻性多机构研究将需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信