Patient satisfaction with inpatient pharmacy services at tertiary care setting—a meta-analysis of recent literature

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anam Azhar, Syed Wasif Gillani, Nada Jiaan, V. Menon, Semira Abdi, H. A. Rathore
{"title":"Patient satisfaction with inpatient pharmacy services at tertiary care setting—a meta-analysis of recent literature","authors":"Anam Azhar, Syed Wasif Gillani, Nada Jiaan, V. Menon, Semira Abdi, H. A. Rathore","doi":"10.1093/jphsr/rmac022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n This study aimed to determine patient satisfaction with the following pharmacist-led services for inpatients in tertiary care hospitals.\n \n \n \n Studies were identified from different databases from 2012 to 2020. A total of 1910 articles were identified using the search strategies out of which 1153 were rejected based on the review of titles and abstracts. The search criteria were the roles of inpatient pharmacists and patient satisfaction with inpatient pharmacy services. Multiple keywords were used such as ‘patient satisfaction’/‘inpatient pharmacist’/‘pharmacist hospital services’/‘clinical pharmacist roles’. The quality of each study was measured using the mixed methods appraisal tool, and the same was used to evaluate the risk of bias as well.\n \n \n \n A total of 11 cross-sectional studies were included in the evidence synthesis of this meta-analysis. Three studies tested the satisfaction of patients with inpatient counselling with a sample size of n = 742. The odd ratio (OR) was 215.33 (141.77 to 327.05) [95% confidence interval (CI)] showed a significant patient satisfaction (P = 0.00001) with the pharmacist’s inpatient counselling (I2 = 0%). Studies showed a statistically significant satisfaction of patients with discharge counselling P < 0.00001 and OR 55.74 (35.93 to 86.49) and heterogeneity I2 = 0%. In a total of five studies, the healthcare professional (HCP) satisfaction with pharmacist services was reported, and satisfied and unsatisfied HCPs were n = 801 and n = 362, respectively. Results showed high satisfaction (P < 0.00001) and OR 4.62 (95% CI, 3.89 to 5.48).\n \n \n \n This meta-analysis concluded that clinical pharmacist services in an inpatient setting have a significant impact on increasing patient satisfaction with their treatment. The clinical pharmacist services are not very well implemented and are limited in some hospitals, but patients who have received these services were highly satisfied and expected to receive them more often.\n","PeriodicalId":16705,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmac022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to determine patient satisfaction with the following pharmacist-led services for inpatients in tertiary care hospitals. Studies were identified from different databases from 2012 to 2020. A total of 1910 articles were identified using the search strategies out of which 1153 were rejected based on the review of titles and abstracts. The search criteria were the roles of inpatient pharmacists and patient satisfaction with inpatient pharmacy services. Multiple keywords were used such as ‘patient satisfaction’/‘inpatient pharmacist’/‘pharmacist hospital services’/‘clinical pharmacist roles’. The quality of each study was measured using the mixed methods appraisal tool, and the same was used to evaluate the risk of bias as well. A total of 11 cross-sectional studies were included in the evidence synthesis of this meta-analysis. Three studies tested the satisfaction of patients with inpatient counselling with a sample size of n = 742. The odd ratio (OR) was 215.33 (141.77 to 327.05) [95% confidence interval (CI)] showed a significant patient satisfaction (P = 0.00001) with the pharmacist’s inpatient counselling (I2 = 0%). Studies showed a statistically significant satisfaction of patients with discharge counselling P < 0.00001 and OR 55.74 (35.93 to 86.49) and heterogeneity I2 = 0%. In a total of five studies, the healthcare professional (HCP) satisfaction with pharmacist services was reported, and satisfied and unsatisfied HCPs were n = 801 and n = 362, respectively. Results showed high satisfaction (P < 0.00001) and OR 4.62 (95% CI, 3.89 to 5.48). This meta-analysis concluded that clinical pharmacist services in an inpatient setting have a significant impact on increasing patient satisfaction with their treatment. The clinical pharmacist services are not very well implemented and are limited in some hospitals, but patients who have received these services were highly satisfied and expected to receive them more often.
患者对三级医疗机构住院药房服务的满意度——近期文献的荟萃分析
本研究旨在确定患者对以下药剂师主导的三级护理医院住院患者服务的满意度。研究是从2012年至2020年的不同数据库中确定的。使用搜索策略共识别了1910篇文章,其中1153篇根据标题和摘要的审查被拒绝。搜索标准是住院药剂师的角色和患者对住院药房服务的满意度。使用了多个关键词,如“患者满意度”/“患者药剂师”/“药剂师医院服务”/“临床药剂师角色”。每项研究的质量都是使用混合方法评估工具来衡量的,同样的方法也用于评估偏倚的风险。本荟萃分析的证据综合共包括11项横断面研究。三项研究测试了患者对住院咨询的满意度,样本量为n=742。奇数比(OR)为215.33(141.77比327.05)[95%置信区间(CI)]显示患者对药剂师的住院咨询有显著的满意度(P=0.0001)(I2=0%)。研究显示,患者对出院咨询的满意度具有统计学意义,P<0.00001,OR为55.74(35.93至86.49),异质性I2=0%。在总共五项研究中,报告了医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对药剂师服务的满意度,满意和不满意的HCP分别为n=801和n=362。结果显示高满意度(P<0.00001)和OR 4.62(95%CI,3.89至5.48)。该荟萃分析得出结论,住院环境中的临床药剂师服务对提高患者对其治疗的满意度有显著影响。临床药剂师服务实施得不太好,在一些医院也很有限,但接受过这些服务的患者非常满意,并希望能更频繁地接受这些服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信