Dehydration Prevention and Diagnosis: A Study in Long-Term Geriatric and Palliative Care

Naschitz Prof. Jochanan E
{"title":"Dehydration Prevention and Diagnosis: A Study in Long-Term Geriatric and Palliative Care","authors":"Naschitz Prof. Jochanan E","doi":"10.23937/2469-5858/1510070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Diagnosing dehydration in frail older persons is challenging. Objective: In residents of long-term geriatric and palliative care to appraise which clinical signs and laboratory data are associated with dehydration. Methods: Study Part I is a cross-sectional point of care assessment of data which might distinguish dehydrated from euhydrated subjects. Twelve potential markers of dehydration were evaluated: inadequate fluid intake, vomiting, diarrhea, bleeding, diuretic treatment, serum sodium, serum urea and creatinine, urea/creatinine ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin and serum albumin. Study Part II is a longitudinal survey of patients at risk of dehydration under changing clinical conditions. He clinical and laboratory data were prospectively followed and related to the patients’ hydration state. Results: By point-of-care assessment (Study Part I) no single clinical or laboratory parameter correlated with dehydration. On longitudinal survey (Study Part II), useful in the diagnosing of dehydration were patient history corroborated with clinical and laboratory parameters designed ‘potential markers of dehydration’. Seven case studies illustrate a variety of scenarios under which dehydration may occur. Conclusions: Diagnosing dehydration in residents of longterm geriatric and palliative care is challenging. Useful to this aim are the day-to-day examination of the patient by the same clinician, with or without the support of conventional ‘laboratory markers of dehydration’. Overemphasis and dependence on laboratory markers may be mislead the physician.","PeriodicalId":91314,"journal":{"name":"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of geriatric medicine and gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5858/1510070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Diagnosing dehydration in frail older persons is challenging. Objective: In residents of long-term geriatric and palliative care to appraise which clinical signs and laboratory data are associated with dehydration. Methods: Study Part I is a cross-sectional point of care assessment of data which might distinguish dehydrated from euhydrated subjects. Twelve potential markers of dehydration were evaluated: inadequate fluid intake, vomiting, diarrhea, bleeding, diuretic treatment, serum sodium, serum urea and creatinine, urea/creatinine ratio, estimated glomerular filtration rate, hemoglobin and serum albumin. Study Part II is a longitudinal survey of patients at risk of dehydration under changing clinical conditions. He clinical and laboratory data were prospectively followed and related to the patients’ hydration state. Results: By point-of-care assessment (Study Part I) no single clinical or laboratory parameter correlated with dehydration. On longitudinal survey (Study Part II), useful in the diagnosing of dehydration were patient history corroborated with clinical and laboratory parameters designed ‘potential markers of dehydration’. Seven case studies illustrate a variety of scenarios under which dehydration may occur. Conclusions: Diagnosing dehydration in residents of longterm geriatric and palliative care is challenging. Useful to this aim are the day-to-day examination of the patient by the same clinician, with or without the support of conventional ‘laboratory markers of dehydration’. Overemphasis and dependence on laboratory markers may be mislead the physician.
脱水的预防和诊断:长期老年和姑息治疗的研究
背景:诊断体弱老年人脱水是一项挑战。目的:在长期接受老年和姑息治疗的居民中,评估哪些临床症状和实验室数据与脱水有关。方法:研究第一部分是对可能区分脱水受试者和正常受试者的数据的横断面护理点评估。评估了12种潜在的脱水标志物:液体摄入不足、呕吐、腹泻、出血、利尿剂治疗、血清钠、血清尿素和肌酸酐、尿素/肌酸酐比率、估计肾小球滤过率、血红蛋白和血清白蛋白。研究第二部分是对在不断变化的临床条件下有脱水风险的患者进行的纵向调查。对他的临床和实验室数据进行了前瞻性随访,并与患者的水合状态相关。结果:根据护理点评估(研究第一部分),没有任何单一的临床或实验室参数与脱水相关。在纵向调查(研究第二部分)中,患者病史与设计的“潜在脱水标志物”临床和实验室参数相证实,对诊断脱水有用。七个案例研究说明了可能发生脱水的各种情况。结论:诊断长期老年患者脱水和姑息治疗具有挑战性。对这一目标有用的是由同一临床医生对患者进行日常检查,无论是否有传统的“脱水实验室标志物”的支持。过度强调和依赖实验室标记可能会误导医生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信