Physics knowledge justification: an analysis framework to examine physics content knowledge

Karoliina Vuola, M. Nousiainen
{"title":"Physics knowledge justification: an analysis framework to examine physics content knowledge","authors":"Karoliina Vuola, M. Nousiainen","doi":"10.5617/nordina.6916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Argumentation and knowledge justification have been noted as important skills to be learned in secondary and tertiary level of education. These skills are especially crucial in teaching and learning physics because physics knowledge is normative and has hierarchical structure. The purpose of this article is two-fold. First, we propose a framework to analyze pre-service physics teachers’ knowledge justification. Second, we show how this framework can be used to examine pre-service physics teachers’ knowledge justification in the context of quantum physics. The sample consists of 68 knowledge justification schemes on four quantum phenomena (N=17 participants who all produced four schemes). The proposed framework discusses conceptual, relational and strategic knowledge presented in knowledge justification schemes. The results show that analysis framework reveal significant differences between pre-service teachers’ knowledge justification. We conclude that there is need and room for such practical tools, which help future teachers to organize and consider their own knowledge.","PeriodicalId":37114,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Studies in Science Education","volume":"16 1","pages":"149-166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Studies in Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5617/nordina.6916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Argumentation and knowledge justification have been noted as important skills to be learned in secondary and tertiary level of education. These skills are especially crucial in teaching and learning physics because physics knowledge is normative and has hierarchical structure. The purpose of this article is two-fold. First, we propose a framework to analyze pre-service physics teachers’ knowledge justification. Second, we show how this framework can be used to examine pre-service physics teachers’ knowledge justification in the context of quantum physics. The sample consists of 68 knowledge justification schemes on four quantum phenomena (N=17 participants who all produced four schemes). The proposed framework discusses conceptual, relational and strategic knowledge presented in knowledge justification schemes. The results show that analysis framework reveal significant differences between pre-service teachers’ knowledge justification. We conclude that there is need and room for such practical tools, which help future teachers to organize and consider their own knowledge.
物理知识论证:一个检验物理内容知识的分析框架
论证和知识辩护被认为是中学和大学教育中需要学习的重要技能。这些技能在物理教学中尤为重要,因为物理知识是规范的,具有层次结构。本文的目的有两个。首先,我们提出了一个分析职前物理教师知识正当性的框架。其次,我们展示了如何使用该框架来检查职前物理教师在量子物理背景下的知识论证。样本由四个量子现象的68个知识证明方案组成(N=17名参与者,他们都制作了四个方案)。提出的框架讨论了知识论证方案中概念知识、关系知识和战略知识。结果表明,分析框架显示职前教师的知识辩护存在显著差异。我们的结论是,这种实用工具的需求和空间,可以帮助未来的教师组织和思考自己的知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nordic Studies in Science Education
Nordic Studies in Science Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信