Conceptual Engineering and the Politics of Implementation

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
M. Queloz, Friedemann Bieber
{"title":"Conceptual Engineering and the Politics of Implementation","authors":"M. Queloz, Friedemann Bieber","doi":"10.1111/papq.12394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Conceptual engineering is thought to face an ‘ implementation challenge ’ :thechallengeofsecuringuptakeofengineeredconcepts.Butisthefactthat implementation is challenging really a defect to be overcome? What kind of pic- ture of political life would be implied by making engineering easy to implement? We contend that the ambition to obviate the implementation challenge goes against the very idea of liberal democratic politics. On the picture we draw, the implementation challenge can be overcome by institutionalizing control over conceptual uptake, and there are contexts – such as professions that depend on coordinated conceptual innovation – in which there are good reasons to institutionalize control in this fashion. But the liberal fear of this power to control conceptual uptake ending up in the wrong hands, combined with the democratic demandfor freedomofthought as a precondition ofgenuine consent,yieldsa liberal democratic rationale for keeping implementation challenging.","PeriodicalId":47097,"journal":{"name":"PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/papq.12394","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

: Conceptual engineering is thought to face an ‘ implementation challenge ’ :thechallengeofsecuringuptakeofengineeredconcepts.Butisthefactthat implementation is challenging really a defect to be overcome? What kind of pic- ture of political life would be implied by making engineering easy to implement? We contend that the ambition to obviate the implementation challenge goes against the very idea of liberal democratic politics. On the picture we draw, the implementation challenge can be overcome by institutionalizing control over conceptual uptake, and there are contexts – such as professions that depend on coordinated conceptual innovation – in which there are good reasons to institutionalize control in this fashion. But the liberal fear of this power to control conceptual uptake ending up in the wrong hands, combined with the democratic demandfor freedomofthought as a precondition ofgenuine consent,yieldsa liberal democratic rationale for keeping implementation challenging.
概念工程与实施政治
概念工程被认为面临“实施挑战”:确保工程概念被接受的挑战。但是,实现上的挑战真的是一个需要克服的缺陷吗?使工程易于实现隐含着什么样的政治生活图景?我们认为,消除执行挑战的野心违背了自由民主政治的理念。在我们所描绘的图景中,实施挑战可以通过对概念吸收的制度化控制来克服,并且在某些情况下-例如依赖于协调的概念创新的职业-有很好的理由以这种方式将控制制度化。但是,自由主义者担心这种控制概念吸收的权力最终会落入坏人之手,再加上民主主义者对思想自由的要求是真正同意的先决条件,这就形成了一种自由民主的理由,让实施变得具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Pacific Philosophical Quarterly is a journal of general philosophy in the analytic tradition, publishing original articles from all areas of philosophy including metaphysics, epistemology, moral philosophy, political philosophy, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind, aesthetics and history of philosophy. Periodically, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly publishes special editions devoted to the investigation of important topics in a particular field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信