Wearable technology and measurement of outcomes from lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery

Q4 Medicine
Megan Tang, Karen Malacon, Gavin Touponse, Corinna Zygourakis
{"title":"Wearable technology and measurement of outcomes from lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery","authors":"Megan Tang,&nbsp;Karen Malacon,&nbsp;Gavin Touponse,&nbsp;Corinna Zygourakis","doi":"10.1016/j.semss.2023.101047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Accurate assessment markers are crucial in the management of lumbar spondylolisthesis, particularly after surgical intervention. Traditional methods to track surgical outcomes primarily rely on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which capture patients’ perspectives on their health and recovery. However, PROMs are subjective and susceptible to bias, affecting their reliability. To overcome these limitations, </span>wearable devices<span> have emerged as valuable tools for tracking real-life mobility and objectively assessing surgical outcomes. These devices provide continuous, remote collection of various health metrics and have been shown to have high efficacy and patient compliance. This chapter reviews the current landscape of combining wearable technology data and PROMs in assessing lumbar surgery outcomes, with a focus on spondylolisthesis patients. Both objective physical activity data and subjective clinical scores demonstrate similar trends in postoperative recovery. However, attempts to correlate these metrics have produced mixed results due to the variation in devices and PROMs used. Establishing standardized protocols for wearable usage and data reporting is crucial for maximizing their utility in monitoring spine patients effectively. Overall, integrating wearable technology with PROMs holds significant potential to enhance postoperative monitoring, improve personalized care, and optimize patient recovery. Future applications may involve predicting outcomes and tailoring interventions based on objective activity data in the early postoperative stage, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and improved healthcare delivery.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":39884,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Spine Surgery","volume":"35 3","pages":"Article 101047"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040738323000412","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate assessment markers are crucial in the management of lumbar spondylolisthesis, particularly after surgical intervention. Traditional methods to track surgical outcomes primarily rely on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), which capture patients’ perspectives on their health and recovery. However, PROMs are subjective and susceptible to bias, affecting their reliability. To overcome these limitations, wearable devices have emerged as valuable tools for tracking real-life mobility and objectively assessing surgical outcomes. These devices provide continuous, remote collection of various health metrics and have been shown to have high efficacy and patient compliance. This chapter reviews the current landscape of combining wearable technology data and PROMs in assessing lumbar surgery outcomes, with a focus on spondylolisthesis patients. Both objective physical activity data and subjective clinical scores demonstrate similar trends in postoperative recovery. However, attempts to correlate these metrics have produced mixed results due to the variation in devices and PROMs used. Establishing standardized protocols for wearable usage and data reporting is crucial for maximizing their utility in monitoring spine patients effectively. Overall, integrating wearable technology with PROMs holds significant potential to enhance postoperative monitoring, improve personalized care, and optimize patient recovery. Future applications may involve predicting outcomes and tailoring interventions based on objective activity data in the early postoperative stage, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and improved healthcare delivery.

腰椎滑脱手术的可穿戴技术和疗效测量
准确的评估标志物对腰椎滑脱症的治疗至关重要,尤其是在手术干预后。追踪手术结果的传统方法主要依赖于患者报告的结果测量(PROM),该测量捕捉了患者对其健康和康复的看法。然而,PROM是主观的,容易产生偏差,影响其可靠性。为了克服这些局限性,可穿戴设备已成为追踪现实生活中的移动性和客观评估手术结果的宝贵工具。这些设备提供了各种健康指标的连续、远程收集,并已被证明具有很高的疗效和患者依从性。本章回顾了结合可穿戴技术数据和PROM评估腰椎手术结果的现状,重点关注脊椎滑脱患者。客观体力活动数据和主观临床评分显示术后恢复趋势相似。然而,由于所使用的设备和PROM的变化,将这些度量关联起来的尝试产生了喜忧参半的结果。建立可穿戴设备使用和数据报告的标准化协议对于最大限度地提高其在有效监测脊柱患者方面的效用至关重要。总体而言,将可穿戴技术与PROM相结合,在增强术后监测、改善个性化护理和优化患者康复方面具有巨大潜力。未来的应用可能包括在术后早期根据客观活动数据预测结果和调整干预措施,最终导致更好的患者结果和改善医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Spine Surgery
Seminars in Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
审稿时长
2 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Spine Surgery is a continuing source of current, clinical information for practicing surgeons. Under the direction of a specially selected guest editor, each issue addresses a single topic in the management and care of patients. Topics covered in each issue include basic anatomy, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, management options and follow-up of the condition under consideration. The journal also features "Spinescope," a special section providing summaries of articles from other journals that are of relevance to the understanding of ongoing research related to the treatment of spinal disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信