Reconsideration of the So-Called “Diana’s Temple” in Ancient Doclea

Peristil Pub Date : 2022-03-31 DOI:10.17685/peristil.64.1
Tin Turković, N. Maraković
{"title":"Reconsideration of the So-Called “Diana’s Temple” in Ancient Doclea","authors":"Tin Turković, N. Maraković","doi":"10.17685/peristil.64.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper represents the first attempt of interpretation and contextualization of Diana’s sanctuary in late antique Doclea, through re-examination of its particular architectural features, which have been documented by archaeologists through the past 131 years. We offer an integral picture of the temple and its temenos, thus once again confirming that the sanctuary was actually a part of large-scale imperial interventions into the urban fabric of the town — those of Emperor Gaius Aurelius Valerius Diocletianus. We substantiate the hypothesis that the temple was a creation of distinctive, highly innovative and original, Diocletian’s “architectural school” of planners, builders and stonemasons.","PeriodicalId":32443,"journal":{"name":"Peristil","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peristil","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17685/peristil.64.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper represents the first attempt of interpretation and contextualization of Diana’s sanctuary in late antique Doclea, through re-examination of its particular architectural features, which have been documented by archaeologists through the past 131 years. We offer an integral picture of the temple and its temenos, thus once again confirming that the sanctuary was actually a part of large-scale imperial interventions into the urban fabric of the town — those of Emperor Gaius Aurelius Valerius Diocletianus. We substantiate the hypothesis that the temple was a creation of distinctive, highly innovative and original, Diocletian’s “architectural school” of planners, builders and stonemasons.
对古代文献中所谓“戴安娜王妃庙”的再思考
这篇论文首次尝试通过重新审视其独特的建筑特征来解读和语境化已故古董Doclea中的戴安娜庇护所,考古学家在过去131年中对其进行了记录。我们提供了这座寺庙及其temenos的完整图片,从而再次证实了该圣地实际上是帝国对该镇城市结构的大规模干预的一部分——皇帝盖乌斯·奥勒留斯·瓦莱里乌斯·戴克里提努斯的干预。我们证实了这样一种假设,即这座寺庙是戴克里先的“建筑学派”,由规划师、建设者和石匠组成的,具有独特性、高度创新性和独创性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信