Comparison study on extraction techniques used to assess S‐phenylmercapturic acid as low benzene exposure biomarker based on gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry

IF 1.3 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
V. G. Milagres, Maria José Nunes de Paiva, M. M. d'Auriol‐Souza, A. L. Larentis, I. C. Costa-Amaral, L. C. André
{"title":"Comparison study on extraction techniques used to assess S‐phenylmercapturic acid as low benzene exposure biomarker based on gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry","authors":"V. G. Milagres, Maria José Nunes de Paiva, M. M. d'Auriol‐Souza, A. L. Larentis, I. C. Costa-Amaral, L. C. André","doi":"10.1002/sscp.202300031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The risk assessment of benzene exposure can be performed based on the analysis of biomarkers in biological monitoring processes. S‐phenylmercapturic acid is a specific benzene biomarker, and its analysis challenges the sensitivity of several analytical methods. The present study aims to develop and standardize an analytic procedure to determine this biomarker through gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, based on different extraction methods, to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the studied analytical method. Liquid–liquid extraction, solid‐phase extraction, liquid‐phase microextraction, and low‐temperature partitioning extraction were tested. The last one was the selected extraction method, which was validated to ensure their quality and reliability. The method above has shown linear correlation to benzene concentrations ranging from 5 to 60 μg L−1 and presented detection and quantification limits of 0.95 and 3.18 μg L−1, respectively. Intra and inter‐assay accuracy recorded variation coefficients equal 3.63% and 8.67%, respectively. The mean accuracy value was 98.72%. This procedure presented linearity, accuracy, and detection and quantification limits within the range of interest adopted to assess occupational and environmental exposure to benzene based on biomonitoring processes.","PeriodicalId":21639,"journal":{"name":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sscp.202300031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The risk assessment of benzene exposure can be performed based on the analysis of biomarkers in biological monitoring processes. S‐phenylmercapturic acid is a specific benzene biomarker, and its analysis challenges the sensitivity of several analytical methods. The present study aims to develop and standardize an analytic procedure to determine this biomarker through gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, based on different extraction methods, to increase the sensitivity and specificity of the studied analytical method. Liquid–liquid extraction, solid‐phase extraction, liquid‐phase microextraction, and low‐temperature partitioning extraction were tested. The last one was the selected extraction method, which was validated to ensure their quality and reliability. The method above has shown linear correlation to benzene concentrations ranging from 5 to 60 μg L−1 and presented detection and quantification limits of 0.95 and 3.18 μg L−1, respectively. Intra and inter‐assay accuracy recorded variation coefficients equal 3.63% and 8.67%, respectively. The mean accuracy value was 98.72%. This procedure presented linearity, accuracy, and detection and quantification limits within the range of interest adopted to assess occupational and environmental exposure to benzene based on biomonitoring processes.
基于气相色谱-质谱联用的S-苯巯基尿酸低苯暴露生物标志物提取技术的比较研究
苯暴露的风险评估可以基于生物监测过程中生物标志物的分析来进行。S‐苯基巯基尿酸是一种特定的苯生物标志物,其分析挑战了几种分析方法的敏感性。本研究旨在开发和标准化一种分析程序,以不同的提取方法为基础,通过气相色谱-质谱法测定该生物标志物,以提高所研究分析方法的灵敏度和特异性。测试了液-液萃取、固相萃取、液相微萃取和低温分配萃取。最后对所选择的提取方法进行了验证,以确保其质量和可靠性。上述方法与苯浓度在5至60μg L−1范围内呈线性相关,检测和定量限分别为0.95和3.18μg L–1。批内和批间准确度记录的变异系数分别为3.63%和8.67%。平均准确度值为98.72%。该程序在基于生物监测过程评估苯的职业和环境暴露的感兴趣范围内具有线性、准确度、检测和定量限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS
SEPARATION SCIENCE PLUS CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信