{"title":"The Serial Portrait and Coeval Time on the Cable Car Up Manakamana Mountain","authors":"Patrick Tarrant","doi":"10.1386/NCIN.15.1.49_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article argues that by framing Manakamana (Spray and Velez, 2013) as a serial portrait, we illuminate the ways that the film situates its Nepalese cable car riders, its American filmmakers and its largely western spectators in an emergent and shared time, and that the sequencing of human subjects that is central to this serial portrait posits an alternative to that once ubiquitous tendency to cast non-western subjects into a time that is past. In 1983’s Time And The Other, Johannes Fabian decried the discursive and ideological effects of denying ethnographic subjects their coevalness, but in Manakamana’s formal experimentation and its strategic deployment of cinematic homologies and spiritual allegories, a reflexivity emerges to reframe the way representations of people can be organized in time.","PeriodicalId":38663,"journal":{"name":"New Cinemas","volume":"15 1","pages":"49-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Cinemas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/NCIN.15.1.49_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article argues that by framing Manakamana (Spray and Velez, 2013) as a serial portrait, we illuminate the ways that the film situates its Nepalese cable car riders, its American filmmakers and its largely western spectators in an emergent and shared time, and that the sequencing of human subjects that is central to this serial portrait posits an alternative to that once ubiquitous tendency to cast non-western subjects into a time that is past. In 1983’s Time And The Other, Johannes Fabian decried the discursive and ideological effects of denying ethnographic subjects their coevalness, but in Manakamana’s formal experimentation and its strategic deployment of cinematic homologies and spiritual allegories, a reflexivity emerges to reframe the way representations of people can be organized in time.
本文认为,通过将《Manakamana》(Spray and Velez, 2013)作为一幅系列肖像,我们阐明了这部电影将尼泊尔缆车乘客、美国电影制作人和大部分西方观众置于一个新兴的共享时代的方式,而人类主题的排序是这部系列肖像的核心,它为曾经普遍存在的将非西方主题置于过去时代的趋势提供了一种替代方案。在1983年的《时间与他者》(Time And The Other)中,约翰内斯·费边(Johannes Fabian)谴责了否认人种学主题同一性的话语和意识形态影响,但在马纳卡马纳的正式实验和对电影同源性和精神寓言的战略部署中,一种反身性出现了,重新构建了人们在时间中的表现方式。