Corporate Social Responsibility in the South African Public Sector: A Focus on Ethical Responsibility

Politeia Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.25159/2663-6689/13863
Monument Thulani Bongani Makhanya
{"title":"Corporate Social Responsibility in the South African Public Sector: A Focus on Ethical Responsibility","authors":"Monument Thulani Bongani Makhanya","doi":"10.25159/2663-6689/13863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a greater understanding of the significance of moral leadership in governance and accountability and transparency in public service. The emergence of a consensus that competent public administration and good governance are the cornerstone of long-term growth supports such realisation. The effects of unethical and unlawful behaviour in the public sector are considered unsustainable for a country’s development because they could erode public confidence in government institutions and the rule of law itself. Furthermore, the South African public has been increasingly outspoken and demanding of public sector officials, showing less tolerance for their shortcomings, shortfalls, and systematic issues. As a result, corporate social responsibility has become a demand due to growing stakeholder demands, the inability of government and civil society to address complex societal issues, as well as the realisation by most businesses that their long-term success depends on their capacity to address localised sustainable development challenges. According to the King Committee on Corporate Governance, a well-managed organisation will be conscious of social issues and respond to them, giving ethical standards a high priority. This paper explores the South African public sector’s ethical responsibility with regard to society’s interests, as demonstrated by accepting responsibility for the impact of its activities on key constituencies, such as customers, employees, shareholders, and communities. The paper employs the secondary sources analysis method for data collection. It is concluded that moral leadership can effect change, modify how public institutions fulfil their legal obligations, and give those who rely on government services high-quality, essential services. In addition, transparent, measurable programmes and outcomes should be the byproduct of responsible corporate citizenship. This paper has three proposals for the public sector, which will mitigate unethical and prohibited conduct in the public sector, and which is considered to be unsustainable for a nation’s development.","PeriodicalId":32317,"journal":{"name":"Politeia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politeia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2663-6689/13863","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a greater understanding of the significance of moral leadership in governance and accountability and transparency in public service. The emergence of a consensus that competent public administration and good governance are the cornerstone of long-term growth supports such realisation. The effects of unethical and unlawful behaviour in the public sector are considered unsustainable for a country’s development because they could erode public confidence in government institutions and the rule of law itself. Furthermore, the South African public has been increasingly outspoken and demanding of public sector officials, showing less tolerance for their shortcomings, shortfalls, and systematic issues. As a result, corporate social responsibility has become a demand due to growing stakeholder demands, the inability of government and civil society to address complex societal issues, as well as the realisation by most businesses that their long-term success depends on their capacity to address localised sustainable development challenges. According to the King Committee on Corporate Governance, a well-managed organisation will be conscious of social issues and respond to them, giving ethical standards a high priority. This paper explores the South African public sector’s ethical responsibility with regard to society’s interests, as demonstrated by accepting responsibility for the impact of its activities on key constituencies, such as customers, employees, shareholders, and communities. The paper employs the secondary sources analysis method for data collection. It is concluded that moral leadership can effect change, modify how public institutions fulfil their legal obligations, and give those who rely on government services high-quality, essential services. In addition, transparent, measurable programmes and outcomes should be the byproduct of responsible corporate citizenship. This paper has three proposals for the public sector, which will mitigate unethical and prohibited conduct in the public sector, and which is considered to be unsustainable for a nation’s development.
南非公共部门的企业社会责任:关注道德责任
人们更加了解道德领导在治理、问责制和公共服务透明度方面的重要性。一种共识的出现,即称职的公共行政和良好治理是长期增长的基石,为实现这一目标提供了支持。公共部门不道德和非法行为的影响被认为对一个国家的发展是不可持续的,因为它们可能侵蚀公众对政府机构和法治本身的信心。此外,南非公众越来越直言不讳,对公共部门官员的要求越来越高,对他们的缺点、不足和系统性问题的容忍度越来越低。因此,由于利益相关者的需求不断增长,政府和民间社会无力解决复杂的社会问题,以及大多数企业意识到他们的长期成功取决于他们应对当地可持续发展挑战的能力,企业社会责任已经成为一种需求。根据King公司治理委员会的说法,一个管理良好的组织将意识到社会问题并对其作出反应,将道德标准放在首位。本文探讨了南非公共部门在社会利益方面的道德责任,通过对其活动对关键选区(如客户、员工、股东和社区)的影响承担责任来证明。本文采用二手资料分析法进行数据收集。结论是,道德领导可以影响变革,改变公共机构履行法律义务的方式,并为依赖政府服务的人提供高质量的基本服务。此外,透明、可衡量的方案和成果应该是负责任的企业公民的副产品。本文对公共部门提出了三个建议,这些建议将减轻公共部门中不道德和被禁止的行为,这些行为被认为是一个国家发展不可持续的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信