A response to Blauth and Oldfield’s “Research into increasing resilience in children with autism through music therapy: Statistical analysis of video data”
{"title":"A response to Blauth and Oldfield’s “Research into increasing resilience in children with autism through music therapy: Statistical analysis of video data”","authors":"Ming Yuan Low, K. Devlin, Stephenie Sofield","doi":"10.1080/08098131.2022.2116472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This letter is an offering for discussion about the relationships between music therapy research and neurodiversity-affirming practice. We are a collective of neuro-divergent, allistic, disabled and/or chronically ill music therapists writing in reference to the article, Research into increasing resilience in children with autism through music therapy: Statistical analysis of video data (Blauth & Oldfield, 2022). Based on our understanding of neurodiversity-affirming practices (Roberts, 2021), we perceive incongruence in the ways the article situates resilience as a neurodiversity-affirming outcome measure without clear realization of this worldview throughout the clinical research process (for an example of neurodiversity-affirming research, please refer to: We noted that several of the “behaviors of resilience” that the researchers coded seemed to value masking behaviors (e.g. look, smile) and pathologize autistic-coping behaviors (e.g. fidget; Price, 2022). Recently, Scrine (2021) introduced concerns regarding the concept of resilience as a form of oppression within music therapy, wherein resilience often requires client assimilation to and within dominant systems. Our primary aim in this letter is to amplify the labor put forth by autistic folx, many of whom highlight the critical need for neurodiversity-affirming practices in therapy, research, and beyond.","PeriodicalId":51826,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Music Therapy","volume":"31 1","pages":"481 - 483"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Music Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08098131.2022.2116472","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
This letter is an offering for discussion about the relationships between music therapy research and neurodiversity-affirming practice. We are a collective of neuro-divergent, allistic, disabled and/or chronically ill music therapists writing in reference to the article, Research into increasing resilience in children with autism through music therapy: Statistical analysis of video data (Blauth & Oldfield, 2022). Based on our understanding of neurodiversity-affirming practices (Roberts, 2021), we perceive incongruence in the ways the article situates resilience as a neurodiversity-affirming outcome measure without clear realization of this worldview throughout the clinical research process (for an example of neurodiversity-affirming research, please refer to: We noted that several of the “behaviors of resilience” that the researchers coded seemed to value masking behaviors (e.g. look, smile) and pathologize autistic-coping behaviors (e.g. fidget; Price, 2022). Recently, Scrine (2021) introduced concerns regarding the concept of resilience as a form of oppression within music therapy, wherein resilience often requires client assimilation to and within dominant systems. Our primary aim in this letter is to amplify the labor put forth by autistic folx, many of whom highlight the critical need for neurodiversity-affirming practices in therapy, research, and beyond.
期刊介绍:
Nordic Journal of Music Therapy (NJMT) is published in collaboration with GAMUT - The Grieg Academy Music Therapy Research Centre (Uni Health and University of Bergen), with financial support from Nordic Board for Periodicals in the Humanities and Social Sciences and in co-operation with university programs and organizations of music therapy in the Nordic and Baltic countries. The Nordic Journal of Music Therapy serves the international community of music therapy by being an avenue for publication of scholarly articles, texts on practice, theory and research, dialogues and discussions, reviews and critique. Publication of the journal is based on the collaboration between the music therapy communities in the five Nordic countries of Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden and the three Baltic Countries of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. This international but still regional foundation offers a platform for development of communication with the broader international community of music therapy. Scholars from all over the world are welcomed to write in the journal. Any kind of scholarly articles related to the field of music therapy are welcomed. All articles are reviewed by two referees and by the editors, to ensure the quality of the journal. Since the field of music therapy is still young, we work hard to make the review process a constructive learning experience for the author. The Nordic Journal of Music Therapy does not step aside from active engagement in the development of the discipline, in order to stimulate multicultural, meta-theoretical and philosophical discussions, and new and diverse forms of inquiry. The journal also stimulates reflections on music as the medium that defines the discipline. Perspectives inspired by musicology and ethnomusicology are therefore welcomed.