What drives organisational performance: strategic thinking, technological change, strategic risks? A modified total interpretive structural modelling approach and MICMAC analysis

IF 2.1 Q3 BUSINESS
Aqueeb Sohail Shaik, Sanjay Dhir
{"title":"What drives organisational performance: strategic thinking, technological change, strategic risks? A modified total interpretive structural modelling approach and MICMAC analysis","authors":"Aqueeb Sohail Shaik, Sanjay Dhir","doi":"10.1108/jibr-09-2020-0309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to explain the interrelationships between the elements of strategic thinking, technological change and strategic risks. The main objective of this research is to identify the hierarchy for the elements of thinking, technological change and strategic risk and also to identify the driving powers of these elements.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe methodology used in this study is modified total interpretive structural modelling and MICMAC analysis which gives the interrelationships and also the driving powers of the elements by analysing the relationships between the elements from the existing literature. This method helps us in answering/understanding the “what”, “how” and “why” of the research. Modified total Interpretive structural modeling is considered in this study, which helps in doing both the paired comparisons and transitivity checks simultaneously. A digraph is constructed at the end of the analysis, which shows the links between the elements, and a driver dependence matrix is constructed, which shows the driving powers.\n\n\nFindings\nThis study gives an understanding of the role of the elements, the relationships between them and the hierarchy of addressing these elements, and also the driving and dependence power. Findings of this research give us an understanding of how strategic thinking/technological change/strategic drives the performance of the firm.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study is conducted with the help of existing literature; this can be further extended by considering the expert opinion.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe model explains the direct and transitive links of the elements and the strength of the relation between them, which helps the researchers and the practitioners to understand the driving power and importance of these constructs. It also helps us to understand the role of these elements and, if implemented in an organisation, which elements need to be prioritised for enhancing the performance of the firm.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nResearch done in the past has individually analysed the elements effecting strategic thinking; this study identifies the relationships between the elements of all three constructs and helps in understanding the levels of hierarchy.\n","PeriodicalId":45364,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Business Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jibr-09-2020-0309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to explain the interrelationships between the elements of strategic thinking, technological change and strategic risks. The main objective of this research is to identify the hierarchy for the elements of thinking, technological change and strategic risk and also to identify the driving powers of these elements. Design/methodology/approach The methodology used in this study is modified total interpretive structural modelling and MICMAC analysis which gives the interrelationships and also the driving powers of the elements by analysing the relationships between the elements from the existing literature. This method helps us in answering/understanding the “what”, “how” and “why” of the research. Modified total Interpretive structural modeling is considered in this study, which helps in doing both the paired comparisons and transitivity checks simultaneously. A digraph is constructed at the end of the analysis, which shows the links between the elements, and a driver dependence matrix is constructed, which shows the driving powers. Findings This study gives an understanding of the role of the elements, the relationships between them and the hierarchy of addressing these elements, and also the driving and dependence power. Findings of this research give us an understanding of how strategic thinking/technological change/strategic drives the performance of the firm. Research limitations/implications This study is conducted with the help of existing literature; this can be further extended by considering the expert opinion. Practical implications The model explains the direct and transitive links of the elements and the strength of the relation between them, which helps the researchers and the practitioners to understand the driving power and importance of these constructs. It also helps us to understand the role of these elements and, if implemented in an organisation, which elements need to be prioritised for enhancing the performance of the firm. Originality/value Research done in the past has individually analysed the elements effecting strategic thinking; this study identifies the relationships between the elements of all three constructs and helps in understanding the levels of hierarchy.
什么驱动组织绩效:战略思维、技术变革、战略风险?一种改进的全解释结构建模方法及MICMAC分析
目的本研究的目的是解释战略思维、技术变革和战略风险要素之间的相互关系。本研究的主要目的是确定思维、技术变革和战略风险要素的层次,并确定这些要素的驱动力。设计/方法/方法本研究中使用的方法是修改的整体解释性结构建模和MICMAC分析,通过分析现有文献中元素之间的关系,给出了元素的相互关系和驱动力。这种方法有助于我们回答/理解研究的“什么”、“如何”和“为什么”。本研究考虑了改进的全解释结构模型,这有助于同时进行配对比较和及物性检查。在分析结束时,构造了一个有向图,显示了元素之间的联系,并构造了驾驶员依赖矩阵,显示了驱动功率。发现本研究了解了要素的作用、它们之间的关系、处理这些要素的层次结构,以及驱动力和依赖力。这项研究的结果让我们了解了战略思维/技术变革/战略如何推动企业绩效。研究局限性/含义本研究是在现有文献的帮助下进行的;这可以通过考虑专家意见来进一步扩展。实践含义该模型解释了要素的直接联系和传递联系,以及它们之间关系的强度,有助于研究人员和从业者理解这些结构的驱动力和重要性。它还帮助我们了解这些要素的作用,以及如果在一个组织中实施,哪些要素需要优先考虑,以提高公司的绩效。独创性/价值观过去所做的研究单独分析了影响战略思维的因素;这项研究确定了所有三个结构元素之间的关系,并有助于理解层次结构的层次。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信