Prediction of Esophageal Varices Based on Serum-Ascites Albumin Gradient in Cirrhotic Patients

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
V. Thong, H. Anh
{"title":"Prediction of Esophageal Varices Based on Serum-Ascites Albumin Gradient in Cirrhotic Patients","authors":"V. Thong, H. Anh","doi":"10.3390/GASTROENT12020023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Ascites and esophageal varices (EV) are the most common complications of portal hypertension, with an incidence of approximately 50%. Since effective preventive modalities have been established for variceal hemorrhage, early detection of EV is critical for primary prevention of bleeding. Serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) can be considered an indirect parameter for the detection of EV and is useful in regions where there is a shortage of human and material resources to perform upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE). The aim was to evaluate the role of serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) in the prediction of esophageal varices (EV) in cirrhotic patients with ascites. Methods: All cirrhotic patients with ascites, identified by ultrasonography, who underwent measurement of SAAG, were included in this study. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) for assessment of the presence and size of EV. Results: The study included 80 cirrhotic patients with ascites. The main causes of cirrhosis were alcohol intake (37.5%), hepatitis B virus (25.0%), and hepatitis C virus (15.0%). Patients with SAAG values > 1.75 g/dL demonstrated EV with a sensitivity and specificity of 78.4% and 83.3%, respectively. SAAG values > 1.8 g/dL were associated with the risk of large EV with AUC of 0.856, sensitivity of 88.24%, and specificity of 50.79%. The correlation coefficient (r) between SAAG and EV was 0.429, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Cirrhotic patients with SAAG values ≥ 1.8 have a higher risk of large EV. In particular, those with values > 1.9 who have higher possibility of bleeding must undergo upper GI endoscopy.","PeriodicalId":43586,"journal":{"name":"Gastroenterology Insights","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3390/GASTROENT12020023","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastroenterology Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/GASTROENT12020023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Ascites and esophageal varices (EV) are the most common complications of portal hypertension, with an incidence of approximately 50%. Since effective preventive modalities have been established for variceal hemorrhage, early detection of EV is critical for primary prevention of bleeding. Serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) can be considered an indirect parameter for the detection of EV and is useful in regions where there is a shortage of human and material resources to perform upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE). The aim was to evaluate the role of serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) in the prediction of esophageal varices (EV) in cirrhotic patients with ascites. Methods: All cirrhotic patients with ascites, identified by ultrasonography, who underwent measurement of SAAG, were included in this study. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) for assessment of the presence and size of EV. Results: The study included 80 cirrhotic patients with ascites. The main causes of cirrhosis were alcohol intake (37.5%), hepatitis B virus (25.0%), and hepatitis C virus (15.0%). Patients with SAAG values > 1.75 g/dL demonstrated EV with a sensitivity and specificity of 78.4% and 83.3%, respectively. SAAG values > 1.8 g/dL were associated with the risk of large EV with AUC of 0.856, sensitivity of 88.24%, and specificity of 50.79%. The correlation coefficient (r) between SAAG and EV was 0.429, which was statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Cirrhotic patients with SAAG values ≥ 1.8 have a higher risk of large EV. In particular, those with values > 1.9 who have higher possibility of bleeding must undergo upper GI endoscopy.
基于血清腹水白蛋白梯度预测肝硬化患者食管静脉曲张
背景:腹水和食管静脉曲张(EV)是门静脉高压最常见的并发症,发生率约为50%。由于已经为静脉曲张破裂出血建立了有效的预防模式,早期检测EV对于一级预防出血至关重要。血清-腹水白蛋白梯度(SAAG)可以被认为是检测EV的一个间接参数,并且在缺乏人力和物力进行上消化道内窥镜检查(UGE)的地区是有用的。目的是评估血清-腹水白蛋白梯度(SAAG)在肝硬化腹水患者食管静脉曲张(EV)预测中的作用。方法:本研究包括所有经超声检查并接受SAAG测量的肝硬化腹水患者。所有患者均接受了上消化道内窥镜检查(UGE),以评估EV的存在和大小。结果:该研究包括80名肝硬化腹水患者。肝硬化的主要原因是饮酒(37.5%)、乙型肝炎病毒(25.0%)和丙型肝炎病毒(15.0%)。SAAG值>1.75g/dL的患者表现出EV,其敏感性和特异性分别为78.4%和83.3%。SAAG值>1.8 g/dL与大EV的风险相关,AUC为0.856,敏感性为88.24%,特异性为50.79%。SAAG与EV之间的相关系数(r)为0.429,具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。结论:SAAG值≥1.8的肝硬化患者有更高的大EV风险。特别是,值>1.9且出血可能性较高的患者必须接受上消化道内窥镜检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gastroenterology Insights
Gastroenterology Insights GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
35
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信