Colombian Transitional Justice: The media discourse of the Peace Agreement and perceptions regarding its institutions

Angélica Caicedo-Moreno, Pablo Castro-Abril, Wilson López-López, Lorena Gil Montes
{"title":"Colombian Transitional Justice: The media discourse of the Peace Agreement and perceptions regarding its institutions","authors":"Angélica Caicedo-Moreno, Pablo Castro-Abril, Wilson López-López, Lorena Gil Montes","doi":"10.18543/djhr.2284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Colombia had the longest internal armed conflict in Latin America, and its government reached a peace agreement with the FARC guerrillas in 2016. This article explores the transitional justice social representations during the signing of the peace agreement (study 1) and their implementation, during 2019-2020 (study 2). The first study analyzes the news related to the institutions created from the peace agreement during 2016. The second study explores different psychosocial variables associated with its two most controversial institutions, the Truth Commission (TC) and the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) during 2019-2020, after the beginning of its work. The findings revealed that news articles from two principal Colombian newspapers illustrate two anchoring categories of transitional justice with an emphasis on victims, while the political position of the newspaper suggests possible disagreements on what peace entails. Surveys showed that political position and victimization are crucial for the approval and support of the TC and the JEP, as well as correlated with the level of media consumption regarding these institutions. \nReceived: 17 September 2021Accepted: 15 November 2021","PeriodicalId":32727,"journal":{"name":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deusto Journal of Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/djhr.2284","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Colombia had the longest internal armed conflict in Latin America, and its government reached a peace agreement with the FARC guerrillas in 2016. This article explores the transitional justice social representations during the signing of the peace agreement (study 1) and their implementation, during 2019-2020 (study 2). The first study analyzes the news related to the institutions created from the peace agreement during 2016. The second study explores different psychosocial variables associated with its two most controversial institutions, the Truth Commission (TC) and the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP) during 2019-2020, after the beginning of its work. The findings revealed that news articles from two principal Colombian newspapers illustrate two anchoring categories of transitional justice with an emphasis on victims, while the political position of the newspaper suggests possible disagreements on what peace entails. Surveys showed that political position and victimization are crucial for the approval and support of the TC and the JEP, as well as correlated with the level of media consumption regarding these institutions. Received: 17 September 2021Accepted: 15 November 2021
哥伦比亚过渡时期司法:媒体对《和平协定》的讨论及其对其机构的看法
哥伦比亚发生了拉丁美洲最长的内部武装冲突,其政府于2016年与哥伦比亚革命武装力量游击队达成和平协议。本文探讨了2019-2020年签署和平协议期间的过渡时期司法社会表征(研究1)及其实施情况(研究2)。第一项研究分析了2016年根据和平协议建立的机构的相关新闻。第二项研究在其工作开始后,探讨了2019-2020年期间与真相委员会和和平特别管辖权这两个最具争议的机构相关的不同社会心理变量。调查结果显示,哥伦比亚两家主要报纸的新闻文章阐述了过渡时期司法的两个主要类别,重点是受害者,而该报的政治立场表明,在和平的意义上可能存在分歧。调查显示,政治立场和受害情况对于TC和JEP的批准和支持至关重要,也与这些机构的媒体消费水平相关。接收日期:2021年9月17日接受日期:2021月15日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信