Rejoinder: How methodological decisions impact the validity of moral content analyses

IF 3.1 2区文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION

Communication Monographs Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/03637751.2021.1963517

F. R. Hopp, R. Weber

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT We herein discuss our commentary in light of Wang and Liu's response and clarify our suggestions regarding their original content analysis. Revisiting the methodological decisions that impact the reliability and validity of moral content codings, we focus on the selection and separation of coding and context units, the importance of keeping the annotations of codebook creators and coders independent for obtaining unbiased reliability estimates, the advantages of intuitive, context-aware text highlighting tasks executed by an optimally trained crowd, and on using the recommended moral dictionary scoring options when automatically coding textual documents. We thank Wang and Liu for their engagement with our commentary and in joining our efforts to improve guidelines for conducting reproducible, reliable, and valid moral content analyses.

查看原文本刊更多论文

复辩状：方法论决定如何影响道德内容分析的有效性

本文根据王、刘的回应讨论我们的评论，并澄清我们对其原创内容分析的建议。回顾影响道德内容编码的可靠性和有效性的方法决策，我们重点关注编码和上下文单元的选择和分离，保持码本创建者和编码员的注释独立对于获得无偏可靠性估计的重要性，直观的，上下文感知的文本突出任务的优势，由经过最佳训练的人群执行。在自动编码文本文档时，使用推荐的道德词典评分选项。我们感谢王和刘参与我们的评论，并加入我们的努力，以改进指导方针，进行可重复的、可靠的和有效的道德内容分析。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Communication Monographs COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Communication Monographs, published in March, June, September & December, reports original, theoretically grounded research dealing with human symbolic exchange across the broad spectrum of interpersonal, group, organizational, cultural and mediated contexts in which such activities occur. The scholarship reflects diverse modes of inquiry and methodologies that bear on the ways in which communication is shaped and functions in human interaction. The journal endeavours to publish the highest quality communication social science manuscripts that are grounded theoretically. The manuscripts aim to expand, qualify or integrate existing theory or additionally advance new theory. The journal is not restricted to particular theoretical or methodological perspectives.