Amplifiers and Dampeners of Patient Safety Risk in the Operating Room: Interim Analysis of Surgical Video Recorded with the Operating Room Black Box

Arthur Tung, M. Fan, S. Pinkney, B. Armstrong, Kenneth R Catchpole, P. Trbovich
{"title":"Amplifiers and Dampeners of Patient Safety Risk in the Operating Room: Interim Analysis of Surgical Video Recorded with the Operating Room Black Box","authors":"Arthur Tung, M. Fan, S. Pinkney, B. Armstrong, Kenneth R Catchpole, P. Trbovich","doi":"10.1177/2327857923121031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preventable intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) may emerge from interactions between multiple work system factors (WSFs) (e.g., technology design, organizational policy, physical environment); these interactions may amplify or dampen patient safety risk. We conducted an exploratory observational study using audiovisual data captured by the Operating Room Black Box to characterize the relationships between associated WSFs. Human factors specialists reviewed video recordings of surgical procedures before transcribing events of interest and classifying them into the relevant WSF categories as defined by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model. Each WSF code was categorized as either a safety threat (ST) or resilience support (RS), and their interactions with associated WSFs were characterized. We transcribed 706 events over 73.5 hours of surgery, and 32 iAEs were identified. We coded 382 STs and 312 RSs, and 249 co-occurring WSF pairings. Co-occurring team (e.g., clear communication, feedback, and leadership) RSs were found to be the most prevalent mechanism to dampen all categories of ST. Co-occurring task (e.g., challenging anatomy) and environment (e.g., disruptive working environments, suboptimal ergonomic monitor setups) STs were the most common risk amplifiers contributing to the occurrence of iAEs. By assessing WSFs in the context of other WSFs, future research may develop interventions that more precisely target risk reduction in the operating room.","PeriodicalId":74550,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","volume":"12 1","pages":"130 - 135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare. International Symposium of Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857923121031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preventable intraoperative adverse events (iAEs) may emerge from interactions between multiple work system factors (WSFs) (e.g., technology design, organizational policy, physical environment); these interactions may amplify or dampen patient safety risk. We conducted an exploratory observational study using audiovisual data captured by the Operating Room Black Box to characterize the relationships between associated WSFs. Human factors specialists reviewed video recordings of surgical procedures before transcribing events of interest and classifying them into the relevant WSF categories as defined by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model. Each WSF code was categorized as either a safety threat (ST) or resilience support (RS), and their interactions with associated WSFs were characterized. We transcribed 706 events over 73.5 hours of surgery, and 32 iAEs were identified. We coded 382 STs and 312 RSs, and 249 co-occurring WSF pairings. Co-occurring team (e.g., clear communication, feedback, and leadership) RSs were found to be the most prevalent mechanism to dampen all categories of ST. Co-occurring task (e.g., challenging anatomy) and environment (e.g., disruptive working environments, suboptimal ergonomic monitor setups) STs were the most common risk amplifiers contributing to the occurrence of iAEs. By assessing WSFs in the context of other WSFs, future research may develop interventions that more precisely target risk reduction in the operating room.
手术室患者安全风险的放大与抑制:手术室黑匣子手术录像的中期分析
可预防的术中不良事件(iAE)可能来自多个工作系统因素(WSF)之间的相互作用(例如,技术设计、组织政策、物理环境);这些相互作用可能会放大或降低患者的安全风险。我们使用手术室黑匣子捕获的视听数据进行了一项探索性观察研究,以表征相关WSF之间的关系。人为因素专家在转录感兴趣的事件并将其分类为系统工程倡议患者安全模型定义的相关WSF类别之前,审查了外科手术的视频记录。每个WSF代码被归类为安全威胁(ST)或弹性支持(RS),并对其与相关WSF的相互作用进行了表征。我们在手术的73.5小时内转录了706个事件,并确定了32个iAE。我们编码了382个ST和312个RS,以及249个共存的WSF配对。共同发生的团队(例如,清晰的沟通、反馈和领导)RS被发现是抑制所有类型ST的最普遍机制。共同发生的任务(例如,具有挑战性的解剖结构)和环境(例如,破坏性的工作环境、次优的人体工程学监测设置)ST是导致iAE发生的最常见的风险放大器。通过在其他WSF的背景下评估WSF,未来的研究可能会制定更准确地针对手术室风险降低的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信