The Holy Abyss of the Absolute: Poe's Critique of Schelling in "Morella" and "The Fall of the House of Usher"

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Sławomir Studniarz
{"title":"The Holy Abyss of the Absolute: Poe's Critique of Schelling in \"Morella\" and \"The Fall of the House of Usher\"","authors":"Sławomir Studniarz","doi":"10.5325/edgallpoerev.24.1.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines the impact of Schelling's philosophy, especially his concept of the Absolute, on two of Poe's tales: \"Morella\" and \"The Fall of the House of Usher.\" It begins with a focused overview of Schelling's chief doctrines, in particular his famous system of identity, and because this system was forged under the influence of Spinoza's monism, the revival of the Dutch philosopher's ideas in post-Kantian German philosophy is also briefly discussed. The article expands on one of the outcomes of this philosophy at the turn of the nineteenth century, namely, the perceived deficiency of philosophical and scientific inquiry and the ensuing privileging of art. As has been recognized, this shift had a direct bearing on emerging Romantic aesthetics, and its emphasis on the symbol as a way of conveying the inexpressible, of revealing the conceptually ungraspable. Both the Romantic theory of the symbol and Schelling's idea of the Absolute provide a conceptual framework for understanding the philosophical resonances of \"Morella\" and \"The Fall of the House of Usher.\"","PeriodicalId":40986,"journal":{"name":"Edgar Allan Poe Review","volume":"24 1","pages":"34 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edgar Allan Poe Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/edgallpoerev.24.1.0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This article examines the impact of Schelling's philosophy, especially his concept of the Absolute, on two of Poe's tales: "Morella" and "The Fall of the House of Usher." It begins with a focused overview of Schelling's chief doctrines, in particular his famous system of identity, and because this system was forged under the influence of Spinoza's monism, the revival of the Dutch philosopher's ideas in post-Kantian German philosophy is also briefly discussed. The article expands on one of the outcomes of this philosophy at the turn of the nineteenth century, namely, the perceived deficiency of philosophical and scientific inquiry and the ensuing privileging of art. As has been recognized, this shift had a direct bearing on emerging Romantic aesthetics, and its emphasis on the symbol as a way of conveying the inexpressible, of revealing the conceptually ungraspable. Both the Romantic theory of the symbol and Schelling's idea of the Absolute provide a conceptual framework for understanding the philosophical resonances of "Morella" and "The Fall of the House of Usher."
绝对者的神圣深渊:坡在《莫雷拉》和《亚瑟王的陨落》中对谢林的批判
摘要:本文考察了谢林哲学,尤其是他的绝对概念,对爱伦·坡的两个故事:《莫雷拉》和《亚瑟王的陨落》的影响。文章首先重点概述了谢林的主要学说,特别是他著名的身份体系,因为这个体系是在斯宾诺莎的一元论的影响下形成的,简要论述了荷兰哲学家思想在后康德德国哲学中的复兴。这篇文章扩展了这一哲学在19世纪之交的成果之一,即哲学和科学探究的不足以及随之而来的艺术特权。正如人们所认识到的,这种转变与新兴的浪漫主义美学有着直接的关系,它强调象征是一种传达无法表达的、,揭示概念上不可解释的。符号的浪漫主义理论和谢林的绝对主义思想都为理解《莫雷拉》和《亚瑟王的陨落》的哲学共鸣提供了一个概念框架
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Edgar Allan Poe Review
Edgar Allan Poe Review LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Edgar Allan Poe Review publishes scholarly essays on and creative responses to Edgar Allan Poe, his life, works, and influence and provides a forum for the informal exchange of information on Poe-related events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信