Axiopsychological Differences of Men’s and Women’s Gender Displays in Modern Ukraine

IF 1.6 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
I. Hulias, Z. Karpenko
{"title":"Axiopsychological Differences of Men’s and Women’s Gender Displays in Modern Ukraine","authors":"I. Hulias, Z. Karpenko","doi":"10.15503/jecs2022.1.351.368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study aim was to explain the axiopsychological differences in young men’s and women’s gender displays in modern Ukraine. \nMethods. The methods for theoretical analysis, synthesis and conceptual modelling of an individual’s life processes in the axiological dimension were used. The sample for the empirical study covered 300 students aged 17 - 22 years and 12 psychological examining techniques were used; the obtained data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance. \nResults. Significant statistical differences were found for 22 compared characteristics, symmetrically distributed between males (110 people) and females (190 people). We has found that the quantitative balance of axiopsychological gender priorities does not mean their semantic similarity: the polarization of respondents’ gender displays was recorded; in particular, women’s self-presentation focused on the top-teleological (absolute subject) level of life (expression of spiritual values ​​and goals), and men’ self-presentation focused on the mono-subject (causal-instrumental, individualistic-pragmatic) level. The study highlights the issues of ensuring the real gender equality in Ukraine by building a meritocratic society. \nConclusions. The article presents the axiopsychological approach in personology and gender psychology and reveals corresponding operations to form an applied (psychological examining) model, which allowed us to obtain relevant scientific results about significant differences between Ukrainian men’s and women’s gender displays.","PeriodicalId":30646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education Culture and Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2022.1.351.368","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The study aim was to explain the axiopsychological differences in young men’s and women’s gender displays in modern Ukraine. Methods. The methods for theoretical analysis, synthesis and conceptual modelling of an individual’s life processes in the axiological dimension were used. The sample for the empirical study covered 300 students aged 17 - 22 years and 12 psychological examining techniques were used; the obtained data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance. Results. Significant statistical differences were found for 22 compared characteristics, symmetrically distributed between males (110 people) and females (190 people). We has found that the quantitative balance of axiopsychological gender priorities does not mean their semantic similarity: the polarization of respondents’ gender displays was recorded; in particular, women’s self-presentation focused on the top-teleological (absolute subject) level of life (expression of spiritual values ​​and goals), and men’ self-presentation focused on the mono-subject (causal-instrumental, individualistic-pragmatic) level. The study highlights the issues of ensuring the real gender equality in Ukraine by building a meritocratic society. Conclusions. The article presents the axiopsychological approach in personology and gender psychology and reveals corresponding operations to form an applied (psychological examining) model, which allowed us to obtain relevant scientific results about significant differences between Ukrainian men’s and women’s gender displays.
现代乌克兰男女性别表现的价值心理差异
本研究旨在解释现代乌克兰年轻男女性别表现的价值心理差异。方法。使用了在价值论维度上对个人生命过程进行理论分析、综合和概念建模的方法。实证研究的样本覆盖了300名17-22岁的学生,使用了12种心理检查技术;对获得的数据进行单向方差分析。后果男性(110人)和女性(190人)之间对称分布的22个比较特征存在显著的统计差异。我们发现,价值心理学性别优先权的数量平衡并不意味着它们的语义相似性:记录了受访者性别表现的两极分化;特别是,女性的自我呈现集中在生活的最高目的论(绝对主体)层面(精神价值的表达​​和目标),而男性的自我呈现集中在单一主体(因果工具、个人主义语用)层面。该研究强调了通过建立精英社会来确保乌克兰真正的性别平等的问题。结论。本文介绍了人格学和性别心理学中的价值心理学方法,并揭示了形成应用(心理检查)模型的相应操作,使我们能够获得关于乌克兰男性和女性性别表现显著差异的相关科学结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Education Culture and Society
Journal of Education Culture and Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信