Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy versus Open Colectomy in Patients with Colonic Carcinoma: A Prospective Randomized Study

Q4 Medicine
Yasser Baz, Y. Orban, Mohammed M. Ezzat
{"title":"Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Assisted Colectomy versus Open Colectomy in Patients with Colonic Carcinoma: A Prospective Randomized Study","authors":"Yasser Baz, Y. Orban, Mohammed M. Ezzat","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1764197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction  The second most common cause of cancer-related mortality is colorectal cancer, and laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC) has gained popularity among surgeons as an alternative to the conventional approach, which is open colecrtomy (OC). The differences between LAC and OC in terms of short-term outcomes have not been well documented, and the aim of the present work is to compare the short-term outcomes of both procedures. Materials and Methods  The present prospective study comprised 164 participants submitted to LAC (n = 82) and OC (n = 82) at the Helwan and Zagazig University hospitals between January 2018 and January 2022. We collected and analyzed demographic data, surgical data, and the short-term outcomes. Results  The LAC group had a significantly lower estimated amount of blood loss, shorter hospital stay, lower rates of incisional surgical site infection, and fewer cases of burst abdomen postoperatively, but with a considerably longer operative time (30.3 minutes) than the OC group. Conclusions  Our findings show that LAC is favorable option to OC, with superior outcomes.","PeriodicalId":15408,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Coloproctology","volume":"43 1","pages":"012 - 017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction  The second most common cause of cancer-related mortality is colorectal cancer, and laparoscopic-assisted colectomy (LAC) has gained popularity among surgeons as an alternative to the conventional approach, which is open colecrtomy (OC). The differences between LAC and OC in terms of short-term outcomes have not been well documented, and the aim of the present work is to compare the short-term outcomes of both procedures. Materials and Methods  The present prospective study comprised 164 participants submitted to LAC (n = 82) and OC (n = 82) at the Helwan and Zagazig University hospitals between January 2018 and January 2022. We collected and analyzed demographic data, surgical data, and the short-term outcomes. Results  The LAC group had a significantly lower estimated amount of blood loss, shorter hospital stay, lower rates of incisional surgical site infection, and fewer cases of burst abdomen postoperatively, but with a considerably longer operative time (30.3 minutes) than the OC group. Conclusions  Our findings show that LAC is favorable option to OC, with superior outcomes.
结肠癌患者腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术与开放式结肠切除术的短期疗效:一项前瞻性随机研究
摘要简介 癌症相关死亡率的第二大常见原因是结直肠癌癌症,腹腔镜辅助结肠切除术(LAC)作为传统方法(开放性结肠切除术)的替代方法,在外科医生中越来越受欢迎。LAC和OC在短期结果方面的差异尚未得到很好的记录,本工作的目的是比较两种程序的短期结果。材料和方法 目前的前瞻性研究包括164名提交给LAC的参与者(n = 82)和OC(n = 82)在2018年1月至2022年1月期间在赫尔万大学和扎加济格大学医院。我们收集并分析了人口统计数据、手术数据和短期结果。后果 LAC组的估计失血量明显较低,住院时间较短,切口手术部位感染率较低,术后腹部爆裂的病例较少,但手术时间明显较长(30.3 分钟)。结论 我们的研究结果表明,LAC是OC的有利选择,具有优越的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Coloproctology
Journal of Coloproctology Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
47 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信