Students’ Perception on Plagiarism and Usage of Turnitin Anti-Plagiarism Software: The Role of the Library

IF 1 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
M. Alua, N. Asiedu, D. M. Bumbie-Chi
{"title":"Students’ Perception on Plagiarism and Usage of Turnitin Anti-Plagiarism Software: The Role of the Library","authors":"M. Alua, N. Asiedu, D. M. Bumbie-Chi","doi":"10.1080/01930826.2022.2146445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Plagiarism adversely affects contributions to knowledge and the goal of instilling the skill of academic writing. Thus, most institutions of higher learning strive to develop mechanisms to help students understand the importance of academic integrity and reasons why they should avoid plagiarism. In many of these institutions, libraries/librarians play an integral role in academic integrity instruction as it is incorporated into information literacy instruction. This study examined students’ understanding of plagiarism and the influence of Turnitin anti-plagiarism software on academic writing. The study used the survey research design. Using stratified and simple random sampling methods, questionnaires were administered to 175 students. Findings from the study revealed that efforts made by the university through seminars have influenced the perception of students on the concept of plagiarism and acts which constitute plagiarism. Though respondents agree with the fact that the use of Turnitin software influences academic writing positively, knowledge about the existence and usage of this software is low since the total number of students who had no idea about the university’s subscription to the software was higher than those who did. Additionally, many of the respondents had difficulty understanding originality reports generated by the software and most were not aware of the existence of the university’s policy on plagiarism. The study recommends for the library to intensify training on the usage and interpretation of similarity reports that are generated by the software as well as making the university’s policy on plagiarism more visible or otherwise lose the capital and efforts invested in producing graduates who can contribute to knowledge and scholarship ethically.","PeriodicalId":46427,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Library Administration","volume":"63 1","pages":"119 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Library Administration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2022.2146445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Abstract Plagiarism adversely affects contributions to knowledge and the goal of instilling the skill of academic writing. Thus, most institutions of higher learning strive to develop mechanisms to help students understand the importance of academic integrity and reasons why they should avoid plagiarism. In many of these institutions, libraries/librarians play an integral role in academic integrity instruction as it is incorporated into information literacy instruction. This study examined students’ understanding of plagiarism and the influence of Turnitin anti-plagiarism software on academic writing. The study used the survey research design. Using stratified and simple random sampling methods, questionnaires were administered to 175 students. Findings from the study revealed that efforts made by the university through seminars have influenced the perception of students on the concept of plagiarism and acts which constitute plagiarism. Though respondents agree with the fact that the use of Turnitin software influences academic writing positively, knowledge about the existence and usage of this software is low since the total number of students who had no idea about the university’s subscription to the software was higher than those who did. Additionally, many of the respondents had difficulty understanding originality reports generated by the software and most were not aware of the existence of the university’s policy on plagiarism. The study recommends for the library to intensify training on the usage and interpretation of similarity reports that are generated by the software as well as making the university’s policy on plagiarism more visible or otherwise lose the capital and efforts invested in producing graduates who can contribute to knowledge and scholarship ethically.
学生对抄袭的认知及Turnitin反抄袭软件的使用:图书馆的作用
剽窃对知识的贡献和灌输学术写作技能的目标产生不利影响。因此,大多数高等院校都努力建立机制,帮助学生了解学术诚信的重要性,以及他们应该避免抄袭的原因。在许多这样的机构中,图书馆/图书馆员在学术诚信教学中发挥着不可或缺的作用,因为它被纳入了信息素养教学。本研究考察学生对抄袭的认知,以及Turnitin反抄袭软件对学术写作的影响。本研究采用调查研究设计。采用分层、简单随机抽样的方法,对175名学生进行问卷调查。研究结果显示,大学通过研讨会所做的努力影响了学生对抄袭概念和构成抄袭行为的看法。虽然受访者同意Turnitin软件的使用对学术写作有积极的影响,但由于不知道大学订阅该软件的学生总数高于知道的学生总数,因此对该软件的存在和使用的了解程度很低。此外,许多受访者很难理解由该软件生成的原创报告,而且大多数人都不知道学校有关于抄袭的政策。该研究建议图书馆加强对软件生成的相似报告的使用和解释的培训,并使大学的抄袭政策更加明显,否则将失去为培养能够在道德上为知识和学术做出贡献的毕业生所投入的资本和努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Library Administration
Journal of Library Administration INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
21.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Library Administration is the primary source of information on all aspects of the effective management of libraries. Stressing the practical, this valuable journal provides information that administrators need to efficiently and effectively manage their libraries. The journal seeks out the most modern advances being made in professional management and applies them to the library setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信