Environmental impacts of the Australian poultry industry. 1. Chicken meat production

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
M. Copley, S. Wiedemann
{"title":"Environmental impacts of the Australian poultry industry. 1. Chicken meat production","authors":"M. Copley, S. Wiedemann","doi":"10.1071/an22230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context Steadily increasing consumption of chicken meat (Australia’s most consumed meat protein) has resulted in expanded production. With societal expectations that industries improve sustainability, understanding baseline impacts is vital. Aims This study determined carbon footprint (kg CO2-e), fossil energy (MJ), fresh water consumption (L), stress (LH2O-e) and scarcity (m3), and land-occupation (m2) impacts for conventional (C) and free-range (FR) production systems, identified hotspots and the implications of changes in production over the past decade, to establish targets for future improvement. Methods In the largest study of its kind, attributional life-cycle assessment with data collected for ∼50% of birds processed was used, reporting impacts per kilogram of the typical market mix of chicken products, and boneless chicken. Uncertainty was assessed through Monte Carlo analysis, and results are presented as the means and standard deviation. Key results Slightly lower impacts per kilogram of chicken meat product were observed for C production (2.1±0.03kgCO2-e, 18.0±0.3MJ, 178.6±22.4L, and 10.2±0.1m2) than for FR (2.2±0.03kgCO2-e, 18.5±0.3MJ, 189.6±24.6L, and 10.6±0.1m2). Feed production was the major hotspot, followed by grow-out and meat processing. Land use (LU) and direct land use-change (dLUC) impacts associated with imported soymeal added 1.7±0.3 and 1.8±0.3kgCO2-e to C and FR respectively. FR carbon footprint and land occupation were significantly (P<0.05) higher. Since 2010, fossil energy, arable land, and greenhouse-gas emissions have declined. One countertrend was LU and dLUC emissions, which increased due to changed soy imports, resulting in a slightly higher C carbon footprint. Conclusions Multi-indicator analysis is fundamental to understanding, communicating, and improving performance, and distinguishing between short-term fluctuations and long-term trends. Since 2010, feed-production impacts have increased (due to imported soymeal in poultry diets), indicating that alternative feed protein sources are a priority. Efficiency improvements reduced per-kilogram impacts across other indicators, demonstrating a positive trend in producing more food from fewer inputs. Implications Australian chicken meat is a low-impact animal protein. Future improvements require alternative feed proteins, technology adoption and practice change to maintain or reduce impacts as production expands alongside consumer demand.","PeriodicalId":49242,"journal":{"name":"Animal Production Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Production Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/an22230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Context Steadily increasing consumption of chicken meat (Australia’s most consumed meat protein) has resulted in expanded production. With societal expectations that industries improve sustainability, understanding baseline impacts is vital. Aims This study determined carbon footprint (kg CO2-e), fossil energy (MJ), fresh water consumption (L), stress (LH2O-e) and scarcity (m3), and land-occupation (m2) impacts for conventional (C) and free-range (FR) production systems, identified hotspots and the implications of changes in production over the past decade, to establish targets for future improvement. Methods In the largest study of its kind, attributional life-cycle assessment with data collected for ∼50% of birds processed was used, reporting impacts per kilogram of the typical market mix of chicken products, and boneless chicken. Uncertainty was assessed through Monte Carlo analysis, and results are presented as the means and standard deviation. Key results Slightly lower impacts per kilogram of chicken meat product were observed for C production (2.1±0.03kgCO2-e, 18.0±0.3MJ, 178.6±22.4L, and 10.2±0.1m2) than for FR (2.2±0.03kgCO2-e, 18.5±0.3MJ, 189.6±24.6L, and 10.6±0.1m2). Feed production was the major hotspot, followed by grow-out and meat processing. Land use (LU) and direct land use-change (dLUC) impacts associated with imported soymeal added 1.7±0.3 and 1.8±0.3kgCO2-e to C and FR respectively. FR carbon footprint and land occupation were significantly (P<0.05) higher. Since 2010, fossil energy, arable land, and greenhouse-gas emissions have declined. One countertrend was LU and dLUC emissions, which increased due to changed soy imports, resulting in a slightly higher C carbon footprint. Conclusions Multi-indicator analysis is fundamental to understanding, communicating, and improving performance, and distinguishing between short-term fluctuations and long-term trends. Since 2010, feed-production impacts have increased (due to imported soymeal in poultry diets), indicating that alternative feed protein sources are a priority. Efficiency improvements reduced per-kilogram impacts across other indicators, demonstrating a positive trend in producing more food from fewer inputs. Implications Australian chicken meat is a low-impact animal protein. Future improvements require alternative feed proteins, technology adoption and practice change to maintain or reduce impacts as production expands alongside consumer demand.
澳大利亚家禽业对环境的影响。1. 鸡肉生产
鸡肉(澳大利亚消费最多的肉类蛋白质)的消费量稳步增加导致了产量的扩大。随着社会期望工业提高可持续性,了解基线影响至关重要。本研究确定了传统(C)和散养(FR)生产系统对碳足迹(kg CO2-e)、化石能源(MJ)、淡水消耗(L)、压力(LH2O-e)和稀缺(m3)以及土地占用(m2)的影响,确定了过去十年生产变化的热点和影响,为未来的改进制定了目标。方法在同类研究中规模最大的一项研究中,采用归因生命周期评估方法,收集了约50%的加工禽类的数据,报告了每公斤典型市场鸡肉产品组合和无骨鸡肉的影响。通过蒙特卡罗分析评估不确定性,结果以均值和标准差表示。每公斤鸡肉产品对C的影响(2.1±0.03kgCO2-e, 18.0±0.3MJ, 178.6±22.4L, 10.2±0.1m2)略低于对FR的影响(2.2±0.03kgCO2-e, 18.5±0.3MJ, 189.6±24.6L, 10.6±0.1m2)。饲料生产是主要热点,其次是生长和肉类加工。与进口豆粕相关的土地利用(LU)和直接土地利用变化(dLUC)影响分别使C和FR增加了1.7±0.3和1.8±0.3kg的co2 -e。FR碳足迹和土地占用显著高于(P<0.05)。自2010年以来,化石能源、可耕地和温室气体排放都有所下降。一个相反的趋势是低碳和低碳排放,由于大豆进口的变化而增加,导致碳足迹略有增加。结论多指标分析是理解、沟通和提高绩效,区分短期波动和长期趋势的基础。自2010年以来,对饲料生产的影响有所增加(由于家禽日粮中含有进口豆粕),这表明替代饲料蛋白质来源是一个优先事项。效率的提高降低了其他指标对每公斤粮食的影响,显示出用更少的投入生产更多粮食的积极趋势。澳大利亚鸡肉是一种低影响的动物蛋白。未来的改进需要替代饲料蛋白、采用技术和改变实践,以维持或减少随着生产和消费者需求的扩大而产生的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Animal Production Science
Animal Production Science AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
7.10%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: Research papers in Animal Production Science focus on improving livestock and food production, and on the social and economic issues that influence primary producers. The journal (formerly known as Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture) is predominantly concerned with domesticated animals (beef cattle, dairy cows, sheep, pigs, goats and poultry); however, contributions on horses and wild animals may be published where relevant. Animal Production Science is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信