“It’s Just Too Much”: The Financial Calculus in Medicare Hospice

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
W. Cabin
{"title":"“It’s Just Too Much”: The Financial Calculus in Medicare Hospice","authors":"W. Cabin","doi":"10.1177/10848223221102544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is extensive literature on the significance of financial incentives in the Hospice Medicare Benefit (HMB) and the growth of proprietary ownership of hospices in the United States. A literature review indicates a paucity of information on hospice nurses’ and hospice social workers’ perceptions of the impact of the HMB’s financial structure on care planning and delivery decisions. In a previous issue of this journal, the author addressed the literature gap by presenting a study on hospice nurses’ perceptions of the impact of financial factors on their decision-making regarding care for Medicare hospice beneficiaries. The study presented in this article is a companion qualitative study to the nurses’ study. This article presents background on the topic and an initial, exploratory study to address the literature gap, based on interviews of a convenience sample of 37 hospice social workers from 6 different hospices between December 1, 2018 and January 31, 2020, in the New York City metropolitan area. Six themes emerged from the interviews: finances are the guiding principle in care planning and service delivery decisions; balancing patient care needs, cost, and finance-related length of stay (LOS) is a challenge; the emphasis on finance diminishes the social workers’ ability to address hospice patient needs; the emphasis on finance diminishes the social workers’ ability to address hospice caregiver needs; the social work role is diminished because of the role of nurses in developing and implementing the plan of treatment, which influences finances; and the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) is the crucial clinical and financial decision-making setting, but gives limited weight to social work input.","PeriodicalId":45762,"journal":{"name":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223221102544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is extensive literature on the significance of financial incentives in the Hospice Medicare Benefit (HMB) and the growth of proprietary ownership of hospices in the United States. A literature review indicates a paucity of information on hospice nurses’ and hospice social workers’ perceptions of the impact of the HMB’s financial structure on care planning and delivery decisions. In a previous issue of this journal, the author addressed the literature gap by presenting a study on hospice nurses’ perceptions of the impact of financial factors on their decision-making regarding care for Medicare hospice beneficiaries. The study presented in this article is a companion qualitative study to the nurses’ study. This article presents background on the topic and an initial, exploratory study to address the literature gap, based on interviews of a convenience sample of 37 hospice social workers from 6 different hospices between December 1, 2018 and January 31, 2020, in the New York City metropolitan area. Six themes emerged from the interviews: finances are the guiding principle in care planning and service delivery decisions; balancing patient care needs, cost, and finance-related length of stay (LOS) is a challenge; the emphasis on finance diminishes the social workers’ ability to address hospice patient needs; the emphasis on finance diminishes the social workers’ ability to address hospice caregiver needs; the social work role is diminished because of the role of nurses in developing and implementing the plan of treatment, which influences finances; and the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) is the crucial clinical and financial decision-making setting, but gives limited weight to social work input.
“太多了”:医疗保险临终关怀的财务计算
在美国,关于临终关怀医疗保险福利(HMB)和临终关怀所有权增长的财务激励的意义有广泛的文献。一项文献回顾显示,关于安宁疗护护士和安宁疗护社工对HMB财务结构对疗护计划和提供决策影响的认知资讯缺乏。在本期刊的前一期中,作者通过提出一项关于临终关怀护士对医疗保险临终关怀受益人的护理决策的财务因素影响的看法的研究来解决文献差距。本研究为护士研究的配套质性研究。本文基于2018年12月1日至2020年1月31日期间对纽约大都会地区6家不同临终关怀医院的37名临终关怀社会工作者的访谈,介绍了该主题的背景和初步探索性研究,以解决文献空白。访谈中出现了六个主题:财务是护理规划和服务提供决策的指导原则;平衡患者护理需求、成本和与财务相关的住院时间(LOS)是一个挑战;对财务的强调削弱了社工处理安宁疗护病人需求的能力;对财务的强调削弱了社会工作者解决临终关怀照护者需求的能力;由于护士在制定和实施影响财政的治疗计划方面的作用,社会工作的作用被削弱;跨学科小组(IDT)是至关重要的临床和财务决策设置,但对社会工作投入的重视有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Home Health Care Management & Practice is a comprehensive resource for clinicians, case managers, and administrators providing home and community based health care. Articles address diverse issues, ranging from individual patient care and case management to the human resource management and organizational operations management and administration of organizations and agencies. Regular columns focus on research, legal issues, psychosocial perspectives, accreditation and licensing, compliance, management, and cultural diversity. Specific topics include treatment, care and therapeutic techniques, cultural competence, family caregivers, equipment management, human resources, home health center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信