Demeaning face of politics and bureaucracy in labour movement in Kenya: A quest for an effective labour law

IF 1 Q2 LAW
Ratemo Tom, Jr.
{"title":"Demeaning face of politics and bureaucracy in labour movement in Kenya: A quest for an effective labour law","authors":"Ratemo Tom, Jr.","doi":"10.14718/novumjus.2022.16.2.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nThe Constitution of Kenya, 2010, the Labour Relations Act, 2007, and the Employment Act, 2007, along with several other labour statutes, are designed to facilitate the establishment of employer-employee unions that play a significant role in safeguarding the social, political, and economic rights/interests of their registered members. Employers and employees generally need a conducive environment to perform their daily duties. Of late, however, continuous interference from political and state machineries in the running of union activities has proved to be a bedrock for regular internal disputes between the management and employees of various institutions in the country. For instance, the Kenya National Union of Teachers has accused, on several occasions, the Teachers Service Commission and politicians of sabotaging the affairs of the union. This paper, therefore, aims to evaluate the constitutional and legal framework regulating the establishment and registration of trade unions in Kenya. Besides, with the aid of judicial pronouncements, it analyses the impact of politics and bureaucracy in exercising the right to freedom of association, an essential element in the survival of trade unions in Kenya. Finally, the paper proposes measures to counter the threat posed by external parties in running trade union activities.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":40163,"journal":{"name":"Novum Jus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novum Jus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14718/novumjus.2022.16.2.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Constitution of Kenya, 2010, the Labour Relations Act, 2007, and the Employment Act, 2007, along with several other labour statutes, are designed to facilitate the establishment of employer-employee unions that play a significant role in safeguarding the social, political, and economic rights/interests of their registered members. Employers and employees generally need a conducive environment to perform their daily duties. Of late, however, continuous interference from political and state machineries in the running of union activities has proved to be a bedrock for regular internal disputes between the management and employees of various institutions in the country. For instance, the Kenya National Union of Teachers has accused, on several occasions, the Teachers Service Commission and politicians of sabotaging the affairs of the union. This paper, therefore, aims to evaluate the constitutional and legal framework regulating the establishment and registration of trade unions in Kenya. Besides, with the aid of judicial pronouncements, it analyses the impact of politics and bureaucracy in exercising the right to freedom of association, an essential element in the survival of trade unions in Kenya. Finally, the paper proposes measures to counter the threat posed by external parties in running trade union activities.
肯尼亚劳工运动中政治和官僚主义的贬损面孔:对有效劳工法的追求
2010年《肯尼亚宪法》、2007年《劳动关系法》和2007年《就业法》,以及其他几项劳工法规,旨在促进建立雇主-雇员工会,这些工会在维护其注册会员的社会、政治和经济权利/利益方面发挥重要作用。雇主和雇员通常需要一个有利的环境来履行他们的日常职责。然而,最近,政治和国家机器对工会活动的持续干预已证明是该国各机构的管理层和雇员之间经常发生内部纠纷的基础。例如,肯尼亚全国教师工会多次指责教师服务委员会和政客们破坏工会的事务。因此,本文旨在评估肯尼亚规范工会成立和登记的宪法和法律框架。此外,在司法声明的帮助下,它分析了政治和官僚机构在行使结社自由权方面的影响,结社自由权是肯尼亚工会生存的一个基本因素。最后,本文提出了应对工会活动中外部因素威胁的措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Novum Jus
Novum Jus LAW-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
85.70%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信