{"title":"Comparison of the clinical effects of early enteral and parenteral nutrition support in patients with severe stroke","authors":"W. Shi","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6706.2020.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the clinical effects of early enteral and parenteral nutrition support in patients with severe stroke. \n \n \nMethods \nFrom June 2017 to July 2018, 65 patients with severe stroke admitted in the First People's Hospital of Yongkang were selected in the study, and the patients were randomly divided into control group(32 cases) and observation group(33 cases) according to the digital table.The control group received early parenteral nutrition support, while the observation group received early enteral nutrition support.The nutritional index, biochemical index, NIHSS score, CPIS score of clinical pulmonary infection and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups. \n \n \nResults \nAfter nutritional support, the serum levels of total protein(TP), albumin(Alb), hemoglobin(Hb) in the observation group were (57.01±2.59)g/L, (39.98±2.64)g/L, (126.86±10.75)g/L, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control group [(54.28±0.76)g/L, (37.31±2.35)g/L, (120.75±13.46)g/L](t=5.727, 4.302, 2.025, all P<0.05). The serum levels of glucose(GLU), creatinine (SCr), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in the observation group were (12.35±2.38)mmol/L, (84.37±13.62)μmol/L, (47.84±4.03)U/L, respectively, which were lower than those in the control group [(14.18±2.37)mmol/L, (91.84±13.21)μmol/L, (66.28±3.76)U/L] (t=3.106, 2.244, 19.060, all P<0.05). The levels of triglyceride(TG), serum urea nitrogen(BUN) in the observation group were (1.95±0.45)mmol/L, (5.80±0.61)mmol/L, respectively, which were higher than those in the control group [(1.66±0.30)mmol/L, (5.32±0.43)mmol/L] (t=0.341, 3.656, all P<0.05). The scores of NIHSS and CPIS in the observation group were (10.31±2.10)points and (3.00±0.76)points, respectively, which were lower than those in the control group [(14.68±2.75)points, (3.79±1.45)points](t=5.279, 2.763, P=0.001, 0.008). The incidence of complications in the observation group [9.38%(3/33)] was lower than that in the control group [31.25%(10/32)], and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=4.986, P<0.05). \n \n \nConclusion \nCompared with early parenteral nutrition support, early enteral nutrition support can improve the nutritional status of patients with severe stroke and is safe and effective. \n \n \nKey words: \nStroke; Enteral nutrition; Parenteral nutrition; Nutritional support; Albumins; Serum albumin; Hemoglobins; Comparative effectiveness research","PeriodicalId":10226,"journal":{"name":"中国基层医药","volume":"27 1","pages":"577-580"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国基层医药","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1008-6706.2020.05.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To compare the clinical effects of early enteral and parenteral nutrition support in patients with severe stroke.
Methods
From June 2017 to July 2018, 65 patients with severe stroke admitted in the First People's Hospital of Yongkang were selected in the study, and the patients were randomly divided into control group(32 cases) and observation group(33 cases) according to the digital table.The control group received early parenteral nutrition support, while the observation group received early enteral nutrition support.The nutritional index, biochemical index, NIHSS score, CPIS score of clinical pulmonary infection and the incidence of complications were compared between the two groups.
Results
After nutritional support, the serum levels of total protein(TP), albumin(Alb), hemoglobin(Hb) in the observation group were (57.01±2.59)g/L, (39.98±2.64)g/L, (126.86±10.75)g/L, respectively, which were significantly higher than those in the control group [(54.28±0.76)g/L, (37.31±2.35)g/L, (120.75±13.46)g/L](t=5.727, 4.302, 2.025, all P<0.05). The serum levels of glucose(GLU), creatinine (SCr), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in the observation group were (12.35±2.38)mmol/L, (84.37±13.62)μmol/L, (47.84±4.03)U/L, respectively, which were lower than those in the control group [(14.18±2.37)mmol/L, (91.84±13.21)μmol/L, (66.28±3.76)U/L] (t=3.106, 2.244, 19.060, all P<0.05). The levels of triglyceride(TG), serum urea nitrogen(BUN) in the observation group were (1.95±0.45)mmol/L, (5.80±0.61)mmol/L, respectively, which were higher than those in the control group [(1.66±0.30)mmol/L, (5.32±0.43)mmol/L] (t=0.341, 3.656, all P<0.05). The scores of NIHSS and CPIS in the observation group were (10.31±2.10)points and (3.00±0.76)points, respectively, which were lower than those in the control group [(14.68±2.75)points, (3.79±1.45)points](t=5.279, 2.763, P=0.001, 0.008). The incidence of complications in the observation group [9.38%(3/33)] was lower than that in the control group [31.25%(10/32)], and the difference was statistically significant(χ2=4.986, P<0.05).
Conclusion
Compared with early parenteral nutrition support, early enteral nutrition support can improve the nutritional status of patients with severe stroke and is safe and effective.
Key words:
Stroke; Enteral nutrition; Parenteral nutrition; Nutritional support; Albumins; Serum albumin; Hemoglobins; Comparative effectiveness research
期刊介绍:
Since its inception, the journal "Chinese Primary Medicine" has adhered to the development strategy of "based in China, serving the grassroots, and facing the world" as its publishing concept, reporting a large amount of the latest medical information at home and abroad, prospering the academic field of primary medicine, and is praised by readers as a medical encyclopedia that updates knowledge. It is a core journal in China's medical and health field, and its influence index (CI) ranks Q2 in China's academic journals in 2022. It was included in the American Chemical Abstracts in 2008, the World Health Organization Western Pacific Regional Medical Index (WPRIM) in 2009, and the Japan Science and Technology Agency Database (JST) and Scopus Database in 2018, and was included in the Wanfang Data-China Digital Journal Group and the China Academic Journal Comprehensive Evaluation Database.