Thinking Together: Lecturing, Learning, & Difference in the Long Nineteenth Century ed. Angela G. Ray and Paul Stob (review)

IF 0.6 Q3 COMMUNICATION
Laura Mielke
{"title":"Thinking Together: Lecturing, Learning, & Difference in the Long Nineteenth Century ed. Angela G. Ray and Paul Stob (review)","authors":"Laura Mielke","doi":"10.14321/rhetpublaffa.23.4.0782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thinking Together is composed of two sections: “ Disrupting Narratives, ” essays that contest established histories of lecturing and learning in the nineteenth century, and “ Distinctive Voices, ” treatments of single fi gures and their accomplishments. Through this scheme, Ray and Stob create a third productive tension tied to methodology: centering practitioners versus emphasizing the (counter)publics in which they operate. The two approaches are, ultimately, impossible to separate; the section distinctions blur as the essays necessarily toggle between speakers and their collaborating audiences to transform our understanding of nineteenth-century lecture culture.","PeriodicalId":45013,"journal":{"name":"Rhetoric & Public Affairs","volume":"23 1","pages":"782 - 786"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rhetoric & Public Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14321/rhetpublaffa.23.4.0782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thinking Together is composed of two sections: “ Disrupting Narratives, ” essays that contest established histories of lecturing and learning in the nineteenth century, and “ Distinctive Voices, ” treatments of single fi gures and their accomplishments. Through this scheme, Ray and Stob create a third productive tension tied to methodology: centering practitioners versus emphasizing the (counter)publics in which they operate. The two approaches are, ultimately, impossible to separate; the section distinctions blur as the essays necessarily toggle between speakers and their collaborating audiences to transform our understanding of nineteenth-century lecture culture.
《共同思考:十九世纪漫长的教学、学习与差异》,Angela G.Ray和Paul Stob(综述)
《一起思考》由两部分组成:“颠覆性叙事”,这是一篇与19世纪既定的演讲和学习历史相抗衡的文章,以及“独特的声音”,这两部分是对单个人物及其成就的处理。通过这个方案,雷和斯托布创造了与方法论相关的第三种生产性张力:以从业者为中心,而不是强调他们所处的(反)公众。这两种方法最终是不可能分开的;章节的区别变得模糊,因为这些文章必然会在演讲者和合作的听众之间切换,以改变我们对19世纪演讲文化的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rhetoric & Public Affairs
Rhetoric & Public Affairs COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
9
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信