Legislative effectiveness under COVID-19 in Africa: striving against executive branch overreach and underreach during pandemics

IF 1.5 Q1 LAW
Paul-Sewa Thovoethin, A. Moshood
{"title":"Legislative effectiveness under COVID-19 in Africa: striving against executive branch overreach and underreach during pandemics","authors":"Paul-Sewa Thovoethin, A. Moshood","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2022.2093905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Legislatures across the world fulfil core functions of representation, law-making, and oversight. Thus, governance goals of participation, transparency and accountability are directly related to these three functions. However, the COVID-19 crisis which started in China in late 2019 and spread to other countries in the world in 2020 disrupted these core functions by forcing the shut-down of parliaments out of concern for the safety of their members and the public in most countries in the world. As experienced in most countries during the COVID-19 crisis, legislatures in some instances were bypassed as presidents and prime ministers prioritise a rapid response. Further, there were conflicts in the manner in which responses were made to address the pandemic between the central government and sub-national governments, especially in federal states. Invariably, legislatures in most countries were marginalised, with greater power concentrated in the hands of the executive, especially at the central level of government. Paradoxically, even where a situation is so urgent that normal checks and balances must be suspended in favour of efficient decision-making, it is still crucial that parliaments play the roles of oversight that make democratic systems ultimately more durable, more effective and more just than any of the alternatives. The purpose of this work, therefore, is to examine how parliaments in Nigeria, South Africa and Ethiopia performed their core functions during the COVID-19 pandemic. It offers what parliaments under federal and parliamentary systems can do in order to prepare them to function effectively during an emergency. While it is to be hoped that a similar global crisis will not emerge in the near future or ever, the paper intends preparing legislatures in Africa to be more proactive and effective in dealing with diverse future challenges.","PeriodicalId":42455,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2093905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Legislatures across the world fulfil core functions of representation, law-making, and oversight. Thus, governance goals of participation, transparency and accountability are directly related to these three functions. However, the COVID-19 crisis which started in China in late 2019 and spread to other countries in the world in 2020 disrupted these core functions by forcing the shut-down of parliaments out of concern for the safety of their members and the public in most countries in the world. As experienced in most countries during the COVID-19 crisis, legislatures in some instances were bypassed as presidents and prime ministers prioritise a rapid response. Further, there were conflicts in the manner in which responses were made to address the pandemic between the central government and sub-national governments, especially in federal states. Invariably, legislatures in most countries were marginalised, with greater power concentrated in the hands of the executive, especially at the central level of government. Paradoxically, even where a situation is so urgent that normal checks and balances must be suspended in favour of efficient decision-making, it is still crucial that parliaments play the roles of oversight that make democratic systems ultimately more durable, more effective and more just than any of the alternatives. The purpose of this work, therefore, is to examine how parliaments in Nigeria, South Africa and Ethiopia performed their core functions during the COVID-19 pandemic. It offers what parliaments under federal and parliamentary systems can do in order to prepare them to function effectively during an emergency. While it is to be hoped that a similar global crisis will not emerge in the near future or ever, the paper intends preparing legislatures in Africa to be more proactive and effective in dealing with diverse future challenges.
2019冠状病毒病下非洲的立法效力:在大流行期间努力防止行政部门越权和越权
摘要:世界各地的立法机构履行着代表、立法和监督的核心职能。因此,参与、透明和问责的治理目标与这三个职能直接相关。然而,2019年末始于中国并于2020年蔓延至世界其他国家的新冠肺炎危机,出于对世界大多数国家议员和公众安全的担忧,迫使议会关闭,从而扰乱了这些核心职能。正如新冠肺炎危机期间大多数国家所经历的那样,在某些情况下,由于总统和总理优先考虑快速反应,立法机构被绕过。此外,中央政府和地方政府,特别是联邦州政府,在应对疫情的方式上存在冲突。大多数国家的立法机构总是被边缘化,更大的权力集中在行政部门手中,尤其是中央政府。矛盾的是,即使情况如此紧急,必须暂停正常的制衡,以利于有效的决策,议会仍必须发挥监督作用,使民主制度最终比任何替代方案都更持久、更有效、更公正。因此,这项工作的目的是审查尼日利亚、南非和埃塞俄比亚的议会在新冠肺炎大流行期间如何履行其核心职能。它提供了联邦和议会制度下的议会可以做些什么,以便为它们在紧急情况下有效运作做好准备。虽然人们希望在不久的将来或永远不会出现类似的全球危机,但该文件打算让非洲的立法机构在应对未来各种挑战时更加积极有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Theory and Practice of Legislation aims to offer an international and interdisciplinary forum for the examination of legislation. The focus of the journal, which succeeds the former title Legisprudence, remains with legislation in its broadest sense. Legislation is seen as both process and product, reflection of theoretical assumptions and a skill. The journal addresses formal legislation, and its alternatives (such as covenants, regulation by non-state actors etc.). The editors welcome articles on systematic (as opposed to historical) issues, including drafting techniques, the introduction of open standards, evidence-based drafting, pre- and post-legislative scrutiny for effectiveness and efficiency, the utility and necessity of codification, IT in legislation, the legitimacy of legislation in view of fundamental principles and rights, law and language, and the link between legislator and judge. Comparative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. But dogmatic descriptions of positive law are outside the scope of the journal. The journal offers a combination of themed issues and general issues. All articles are submitted to double blind review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信