Comparison of Virtual and Lecture-Based Methods of Education on Learning of Physiotherapy Students: A Post-Test Only Design Study

Z. Rojhani-Shirazi, S. Bordbar, Ahmad Baleshzar
{"title":"Comparison of Virtual and Lecture-Based Methods of Education on Learning of Physiotherapy Students: A Post-Test Only Design Study","authors":"Z. Rojhani-Shirazi, S. Bordbar, Ahmad Baleshzar","doi":"10.5812/IJVLMS.83666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The ever-increasing development of information and communication technologies has created new opportunities in the domains of curriculum planning and teaching. In this study, an exercise therapy course was held using both lecture-based and virtual teaching methods. Then, the students’ opinions were investigated and their overall levels of satisfaction were measured. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among all physiotherapy students who had enrolled in the fourth semester of 2014 academic year and had selected the course of principles of exercise therapy. This study was conducted during one semester. We evaluated the effect of lecture-based and virtual (multimedia-based) methods of education according to the learning management system (LMS) among 20 students. A researcher-made questionnaire was designed regarding satisfaction with virtual versus lecture-based teaching methods; the questionnaire was scored based on a five-point Likert-type scale. Results: Of 20 students, one individual was single and 19 were married. Moreover, the mean test score was 12.38 ± 3.23 for the virtual teaching method, while it was 14.21 ± 1.88 for the lecture-based one, showing a significant difference (P = 0.03). Generally, 50% of the students preferred the virtual teaching method over the lecture-based one. In total, 75% of the students were satisfied or totally satisfied with the virtual teaching method for the exercise therapy course. Conclusions: In terms of scores, the lecture-based method was better than the virtual one. However, the level of student’s satisfaction in the virtual method was higher than the lecture-based one.","PeriodicalId":33759,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/IJVLMS.83666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: The ever-increasing development of information and communication technologies has created new opportunities in the domains of curriculum planning and teaching. In this study, an exercise therapy course was held using both lecture-based and virtual teaching methods. Then, the students’ opinions were investigated and their overall levels of satisfaction were measured. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among all physiotherapy students who had enrolled in the fourth semester of 2014 academic year and had selected the course of principles of exercise therapy. This study was conducted during one semester. We evaluated the effect of lecture-based and virtual (multimedia-based) methods of education according to the learning management system (LMS) among 20 students. A researcher-made questionnaire was designed regarding satisfaction with virtual versus lecture-based teaching methods; the questionnaire was scored based on a five-point Likert-type scale. Results: Of 20 students, one individual was single and 19 were married. Moreover, the mean test score was 12.38 ± 3.23 for the virtual teaching method, while it was 14.21 ± 1.88 for the lecture-based one, showing a significant difference (P = 0.03). Generally, 50% of the students preferred the virtual teaching method over the lecture-based one. In total, 75% of the students were satisfied or totally satisfied with the virtual teaching method for the exercise therapy course. Conclusions: In terms of scores, the lecture-based method was better than the virtual one. However, the level of student’s satisfaction in the virtual method was higher than the lecture-based one.
物理治疗学生虚拟教学与课堂教学的比较:一项仅限测试后的设计研究
背景:信息和通信技术的不断发展为课程规划和教学领域创造了新的机遇。本研究采用课堂授课与虚拟教学相结合的方式进行运动治疗课程的教学。然后,调查学生的意见,并测量他们的整体满意度。方法:采用横断面研究方法,对2014学年第四学期入学的所有选择运动治疗原理课程的物理治疗专业学生进行研究。这项研究进行了一个学期。我们根据学习管理系统(LMS)对20名学生进行了基于讲座和基于虚拟(多媒体)的教育方法的效果评估。研究人员设计了一份问卷,调查虚拟教学与课堂教学的满意度;问卷是根据李克特五分制进行评分的。结果:20名学生中,单身1人,已婚19人。虚拟教学的平均考试成绩为12.38±3.23分,课堂教学的平均考试成绩为14.21±1.88分,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.03)。一般来说,50%的学生更喜欢虚拟教学方法而不是基于讲座的教学方法。总的来说,75%的学生对运动治疗课程的虚拟教学方法感到满意或完全满意。结论:在得分方面,基于讲座的方法优于虚拟方法。然而,学生对虚拟教学的满意度高于课堂教学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信