A meta-synthesis of person-centredness in nursing curricula

D. O’Donnell, B. McCormack, T. Mccance, S. Mcilfatrick
{"title":"A meta-synthesis of person-centredness in nursing curricula","authors":"D. O’Donnell, B. McCormack, T. Mccance, S. Mcilfatrick","doi":"10.19043/IPDJ.10SUPPL2.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Person-centred approaches to practice are synonymous with effective healthcare. It is therefore important that the nursing workforce values, recognises and demonstrates person-centred practice. This has implications for nursing education and how curricula prepare students for personcentred practice. Aim: To conduct a meta-synthesis of person-centredness in nursing curricula. Method: Meta-synthesis. Results: The meta-synthesis included 48 papers. Four themes were identified: • Moving beyond mediocrity (dissatisfaction with current teaching and learning approaches, and a desire to enhance curricula to promote person-centredness) • Me, myself and I (promoting person-centredness in nursing curricula requires all participants in nursing education to have self-knowledge) • The curricular suitcase (nursing curricula have finite capacity so the inclusion of personcentredness is an essential requirement for the career journey) • Learning elevators (it is important to prioritise learning cultures and experiences that help students understand and enact person-centred practice) Conclusion: This study has found that nurse educators aspire to and are committed to the promotion of person-centred practice. Internationally, a range of pedagogies and curricular developments to promote person-centredness have been positively evaluated. However, there is generally a lack of conceptual clarity about the nature of person-centredness and no evidence of a systematic approach to whole-curriculum development that reflects the theoretical principles of person-centred practice. Implications for practice development: • Person-centred practice is a prominent concept in healthcare policy. If the future nursing workforce is to be prepared for person-centred practice then proficiency standards and nursing curricula should consistently reflect this • Nursing curricula need to be developed to encompass a breadth and depth of learning experiences in academic and practice settings, in order to optimise student learning about those issues that matter most to people in need of healthcare","PeriodicalId":30387,"journal":{"name":"International Practice Development Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Practice Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19043/IPDJ.10SUPPL2.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Person-centred approaches to practice are synonymous with effective healthcare. It is therefore important that the nursing workforce values, recognises and demonstrates person-centred practice. This has implications for nursing education and how curricula prepare students for personcentred practice. Aim: To conduct a meta-synthesis of person-centredness in nursing curricula. Method: Meta-synthesis. Results: The meta-synthesis included 48 papers. Four themes were identified: • Moving beyond mediocrity (dissatisfaction with current teaching and learning approaches, and a desire to enhance curricula to promote person-centredness) • Me, myself and I (promoting person-centredness in nursing curricula requires all participants in nursing education to have self-knowledge) • The curricular suitcase (nursing curricula have finite capacity so the inclusion of personcentredness is an essential requirement for the career journey) • Learning elevators (it is important to prioritise learning cultures and experiences that help students understand and enact person-centred practice) Conclusion: This study has found that nurse educators aspire to and are committed to the promotion of person-centred practice. Internationally, a range of pedagogies and curricular developments to promote person-centredness have been positively evaluated. However, there is generally a lack of conceptual clarity about the nature of person-centredness and no evidence of a systematic approach to whole-curriculum development that reflects the theoretical principles of person-centred practice. Implications for practice development: • Person-centred practice is a prominent concept in healthcare policy. If the future nursing workforce is to be prepared for person-centred practice then proficiency standards and nursing curricula should consistently reflect this • Nursing curricula need to be developed to encompass a breadth and depth of learning experiences in academic and practice settings, in order to optimise student learning about those issues that matter most to people in need of healthcare
护理课程中以人为本的综合研究
背景:以人为中心的实践方法是有效医疗保健的代名词。因此,重要的是,护理人员重视、认可并展示以人为本的实践。这对护理教育以及课程如何培养学生以人为中心的实践具有启示意义。目的:对护理课程中的以人为本进行元综合。方法:Meta synthesis。结果:共收录论文48篇。确定了四个主题:•超越平庸(对当前教学方法的不满,以及希望加强课程以促进以人为本)•我,我和我(在护理课程中提倡以人为本要求所有护理教育参与者都有自知之明)•课程手提箱(护理课程能力有限,因此将以人为本纳入职业生涯是必不可少的)•学习电梯(重要的是要优先考虑有助于学生理解和实施以人为本的实践的学习文化和经验)结论:本研究发现,护士教育工作者渴望并致力于促进以人为本的实践。在国际上,促进以人为本的一系列教学法和课程发展得到了积极评价。然而,人们普遍对以人为本的本质缺乏概念上的明确性,也没有证据表明对整个课程开发采取了反映以人为本实践理论原则的系统方法。对实践发展的影响:•以人为本的实践是医疗政策中的一个突出概念。如果未来的护理队伍要为以人为中心的实践做好准备,那么能力标准和护理课程应该始终如一地反映这一点。护理课程需要制定,以涵盖学术和实践环境中的广泛和深度的学习经验,为了优化学生对那些对需要医疗保健的人最重要的问题的学习
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信