Daten, Atmosphären, Texte – Künstlerische Erfahrungsräume und Virtualisierungen des Literarischen

IF 0.6 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Annette Urban
{"title":"Daten, Atmosphären, Texte – Künstlerische Erfahrungsräume und Virtualisierungen des Literarischen","authors":"Annette Urban","doi":"10.1515/jlt-2023-2006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article deals with contemporary interweavings of literature and visual art. It asks to what extent they include their own form of mediation of the literary and can be relevant in terms of literary theory. This is prompted by the currently diagnosed migration towards ›Literature’s Elsewheres‹ (Annette Gilbert), which, within the omnipresent digital culture, leads away from its traditional media and places. As one of these refuges, the art museum has already come into focus. In addition to being a shelter, it also promises to be a site of reinvention for literature because it offers different modes of presentation, display structures, and modes of experience. Nevertheless, while the literariness of media art has already been explored (Claudia Benthien et al.), less consideration has been given to the spatializing means of exhibition display and, in particular, art installation. Particularly revealing are those examples that attempt to connect the museum and the digital elsewhere of literary writing. For this second site of transformation is usually considered as part of the mass-practiced digital reading-writing culture, so that bridges to the visual arts emerge primarily through related conceptual approaches of appropriation rather than through the specific experiential framework of the art context. As a starting point, therefore, serve theses on the writing of contemporary artists understood as a practice of appropriation that increasingly involves publication gestures and mediation performances (Stefan Römer). Thus, artistic appropriations of literature and poeticized theory can be brought into view, which are performed in physical as well as virtual spaces and, for this purpose, are subjected to a process of datafication as two selected works of contemporary art show. In addition, the concept of atmospheres anchored in recent aesthetics, literary and media theory proves helpful in approaching such examples. For as »spheres of sensed bodily presence« (Gernot Böhme), they imply a mediation-relevant concept of aesthetic experience that privileges body-bound presence over hermeneutics and also open up a different reality of literature (Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht). At the same time, as a concept linked back to space it enables an expanded understanding of space/body/object ensembles and can be intertwined with theories of atmospheric media including their immersive environments (Tim Othold). On this basis, the first main part of the article explores the tendencies towards conceptualization, spatialization, and the performative, which are particularly at work in the intermediation of literature and the visual arts. A common point of reference here is the conceptual as uncreative writing of Kenneth Goldsmith, which shows distinctive publication performances and uses of the physical space of art exhibitions. In order to further ground forms of the spatial-installative exhibition of literature in literary theory, recourse is made to Roman Jakobson’s reflections on meaning in poetic language, which is evoked by the very positionality of words and the equivalences they evoke (Heike Gfrereis). Furthermore, it is necessary to briefly define the relationship between literature and visual art in the sign of the digital, which still favors their entanglement due to the detachment from the printed text. The paragons proclaimed by Goldsmith, which aim at a competition in terms of avant-gardism as well as digital-cultural contemporaneity, only seem informative because they promote an equation of writing, reading, and theorizing and thus imply a circular but also quite closed model of mediation among writers as readers and critics of themselves. Beyond this, the premises of fluid boundaries between the arts and of an»interdisciplinary and audio-visual method of language work« (Catherine Bergvall) are more profitable for analyzing reciprocal mediations, going back to Katherine N. Hayles and her early genre-spanning definition of digital art with the core characteristic of the literary instead of textuality. Regardless of the now multimodal research agenda (Thorsten Ries) and the conceptualization of digital literature/art as ›speech before our eyes‹ that focuses on an embodied literary experience (Brooke Belisle), however, screen-based images often remain in the foreground. Concerning the spatialized-environmental entanglements of art and literature, the theorization of the ›text as event‹ provides some more clues. Following reflections on the digital poem (Katherine N. Hayles), it has been further developed for the sublinguistic calm technologies of ubiquitous computing (Roberto Simanowski). While the resulting ›culture of presence‹ is seen as a-semantization, the two artworks by Pierre Huyghe and Jazmina Figueroa in the second main part give rise to discuss whether these antagonisms must be maintained. Selected for this purpose are Huyghe’s exhibition, which transfers Edgar Allan Poe’s novel The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket into a so-called musical staged on the three floors of the Bregenz Kunsthaus, and, a lecture performance that Figueroa conceived for the virtual replica of an exhibition space at the Center for Art and Media (ZKM) Karlsruhe. The two artworks can be examined as paradigmatic surrounding textual atmospheres, each of which performs its own specific virtualization of the literary. In Huyghe’s case, his exhibition presents an already datafied but largely pre-digital artistic staging of a classic of world literature literally condensed into artificial weather events. Figueora, in turn, transfers such a score into a VR environment, where it allows for an individually navigable listening experience of her spatialized spoken words, which present a motivically condensed, poeticized appropriation of theoretical fragments and mythological themes. In conclusion, these exemplary artistic fusions of the museum and digital elsewhere of literature are considered regarding their forms of storage and temporality, which enable a re-experiencing of texts as atmospheric presence-events.","PeriodicalId":42872,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Literary Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Literary Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jlt-2023-2006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article deals with contemporary interweavings of literature and visual art. It asks to what extent they include their own form of mediation of the literary and can be relevant in terms of literary theory. This is prompted by the currently diagnosed migration towards ›Literature’s Elsewheres‹ (Annette Gilbert), which, within the omnipresent digital culture, leads away from its traditional media and places. As one of these refuges, the art museum has already come into focus. In addition to being a shelter, it also promises to be a site of reinvention for literature because it offers different modes of presentation, display structures, and modes of experience. Nevertheless, while the literariness of media art has already been explored (Claudia Benthien et al.), less consideration has been given to the spatializing means of exhibition display and, in particular, art installation. Particularly revealing are those examples that attempt to connect the museum and the digital elsewhere of literary writing. For this second site of transformation is usually considered as part of the mass-practiced digital reading-writing culture, so that bridges to the visual arts emerge primarily through related conceptual approaches of appropriation rather than through the specific experiential framework of the art context. As a starting point, therefore, serve theses on the writing of contemporary artists understood as a practice of appropriation that increasingly involves publication gestures and mediation performances (Stefan Römer). Thus, artistic appropriations of literature and poeticized theory can be brought into view, which are performed in physical as well as virtual spaces and, for this purpose, are subjected to a process of datafication as two selected works of contemporary art show. In addition, the concept of atmospheres anchored in recent aesthetics, literary and media theory proves helpful in approaching such examples. For as »spheres of sensed bodily presence« (Gernot Böhme), they imply a mediation-relevant concept of aesthetic experience that privileges body-bound presence over hermeneutics and also open up a different reality of literature (Hans Ulrich Gumbrecht). At the same time, as a concept linked back to space it enables an expanded understanding of space/body/object ensembles and can be intertwined with theories of atmospheric media including their immersive environments (Tim Othold). On this basis, the first main part of the article explores the tendencies towards conceptualization, spatialization, and the performative, which are particularly at work in the intermediation of literature and the visual arts. A common point of reference here is the conceptual as uncreative writing of Kenneth Goldsmith, which shows distinctive publication performances and uses of the physical space of art exhibitions. In order to further ground forms of the spatial-installative exhibition of literature in literary theory, recourse is made to Roman Jakobson’s reflections on meaning in poetic language, which is evoked by the very positionality of words and the equivalences they evoke (Heike Gfrereis). Furthermore, it is necessary to briefly define the relationship between literature and visual art in the sign of the digital, which still favors their entanglement due to the detachment from the printed text. The paragons proclaimed by Goldsmith, which aim at a competition in terms of avant-gardism as well as digital-cultural contemporaneity, only seem informative because they promote an equation of writing, reading, and theorizing and thus imply a circular but also quite closed model of mediation among writers as readers and critics of themselves. Beyond this, the premises of fluid boundaries between the arts and of an»interdisciplinary and audio-visual method of language work« (Catherine Bergvall) are more profitable for analyzing reciprocal mediations, going back to Katherine N. Hayles and her early genre-spanning definition of digital art with the core characteristic of the literary instead of textuality. Regardless of the now multimodal research agenda (Thorsten Ries) and the conceptualization of digital literature/art as ›speech before our eyes‹ that focuses on an embodied literary experience (Brooke Belisle), however, screen-based images often remain in the foreground. Concerning the spatialized-environmental entanglements of art and literature, the theorization of the ›text as event‹ provides some more clues. Following reflections on the digital poem (Katherine N. Hayles), it has been further developed for the sublinguistic calm technologies of ubiquitous computing (Roberto Simanowski). While the resulting ›culture of presence‹ is seen as a-semantization, the two artworks by Pierre Huyghe and Jazmina Figueroa in the second main part give rise to discuss whether these antagonisms must be maintained. Selected for this purpose are Huyghe’s exhibition, which transfers Edgar Allan Poe’s novel The Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym of Nantucket into a so-called musical staged on the three floors of the Bregenz Kunsthaus, and, a lecture performance that Figueroa conceived for the virtual replica of an exhibition space at the Center for Art and Media (ZKM) Karlsruhe. The two artworks can be examined as paradigmatic surrounding textual atmospheres, each of which performs its own specific virtualization of the literary. In Huyghe’s case, his exhibition presents an already datafied but largely pre-digital artistic staging of a classic of world literature literally condensed into artificial weather events. Figueora, in turn, transfers such a score into a VR environment, where it allows for an individually navigable listening experience of her spatialized spoken words, which present a motivically condensed, poeticized appropriation of theoretical fragments and mythological themes. In conclusion, these exemplary artistic fusions of the museum and digital elsewhere of literature are considered regarding their forms of storage and temporality, which enable a re-experiencing of texts as atmospheric presence-events.
数据、大气层、文本——艺术体验和文学虚拟品
摘要本文探讨当代文学与视觉艺术的交织。它问的是他们在多大程度上包含了自己的文学中介形式以及在文学理论方面的相关性。这是由目前被诊断为向《文学的别处》(Annette Gilbert)的迁移所推动的,在无所不在的数字文化中,它远离了传统的媒体和地方。作为这些避难所之一,艺术博物馆已经成为人们关注的焦点。除了作为一个庇护所,它还承诺成为一个文学再创造的场所,因为它提供了不同的呈现模式、展示结构和体验模式。然而,虽然媒体艺术的文学性已经被探索过(Claudia Benthien等人),但对展览展示的空间化手段,特别是艺术装置的考虑却很少。那些试图将博物馆与文学写作的数字场所联系起来的例子尤其能说明问题。因为第二种转变通常被认为是大众实践的数字阅读-写作文化的一部分,因此,与视觉艺术的桥梁主要通过相关的挪用概念方法出现,而不是通过艺术背景的特定经验框架。因此,作为一个起点,服务于当代艺术家写作的论文被理解为一种越来越多地涉及出版姿态和调解表演的挪用实践(Stefan Römer)。因此,文学和诗化理论的艺术挪用可以进入视野,在物理空间和虚拟空间中进行,为此目的,作为当代艺术展览的两件精选作品,经历了数据化的过程。此外,最近的美学、文学和媒体理论中所锚定的氛围概念在接近这些例子时被证明是有帮助的。因为作为“感知身体存在的领域”(Gernot Böhme),它们暗示了一种与审美经验相关的中介概念,这种概念将身体束缚的存在特权于解释学之上,也打开了一种不同的文学现实(汉斯·乌尔里希·冈布雷希特)。同时,作为一个与空间联系在一起的概念,它可以扩展对空间/身体/物体整体的理解,并可以与大气媒体的理论交织在一起,包括它们的沉浸式环境(Tim Othold)。在此基础上,文章的第一部分主要探讨了概念化、空间化和表演化的趋势,特别是在文学和视觉艺术的中介中起作用。这里一个共同的参考点是肯尼斯·戈德史密斯(Kenneth Goldsmith)的概念性非创造性写作,它展示了独特的出版表演和对艺术展览物理空间的使用。为了在文学理论中进一步确立文学的空间装置展示形式,我们参考了罗曼·雅各布森关于诗歌语言意义的思考,这种意义是由词语的位置性及其所唤起的对等所唤起的(Heike gfreereis)。此外,有必要在数字符号中简要界定文学与视觉艺术的关系,由于与印刷文本的分离,数字符号仍然倾向于它们的纠缠。戈德史密斯宣称的典范,旨在先锋主义和数字文化当代性方面的竞争,只是因为它们促进了写作、阅读和理论化的平衡,从而暗示了作家作为读者和自己的批评者之间的循环,但也是相当封闭的调解模式,所以看起来很有信息。除此之外,艺术之间的流动边界和“语言作品的跨学科和视听方法”(Catherine Bergvall)的前提对于分析相互调解更有利,可以追溯到Katherine N. Hayles和她早期对数字艺术的跨类型定义,其核心特征是文学而不是文本。不管现在的多模式研究议程(Thorsten Ries)和数字文学/艺术的概念化是“我们眼前的演讲”,它关注的是具体化的文学体验(Brooke Belisle),然而,基于屏幕的图像往往仍然处于前景。关于艺术与文学的空间化与环境的纠缠,“文本即事件”的理论化提供了更多的线索。继对数字诗歌的反思(Katherine N. Hayles)之后,它又进一步发展为泛在计算的次语言平静技术(Roberto Simanowski)。虽然由此产生的“存在文化”被视为一种语义化,但皮埃尔·于格(Pierre Huyghe)和贾兹米娜·菲格罗亚(Jazmina Figueroa)在第二部分的两件作品引发了对这些对立是否必须保持的讨论。 为此选择了于格的展览,将埃德加·爱伦·坡的小说《阿瑟·戈登·皮姆的故事》转化为在布雷根茨艺术中心三层上演的所谓音乐剧,以及菲格罗亚为卡尔斯鲁厄艺术与媒体中心(ZKM)展览空间的虚拟复制品所构想的演讲表演。这两件艺术品可以被视为围绕文本氛围的范例,每一件作品都表现出自己特定的文学虚拟化。在Huyghe的展览中,他展示了一个已经数据化的,但在很大程度上是前数字时代的世界文学经典的艺术舞台,它被浓缩成人工天气事件。反过来,菲格奥拉将这样的乐谱转移到一个虚拟现实环境中,在那里,她的空间化的口语可以让个人导航的聆听体验,这些话语呈现出一种动机上的浓缩,对理论片段和神话主题的诗意化挪用。总之,这些博物馆和数字文学的典型艺术融合被认为是基于它们的存储形式和时间性,这使得文本作为大气存在事件的重新体验成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Literary Theory
Journal of Literary Theory LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信