Tillage, Residues Management, and Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Soil Organic Status, Soil Quality, and Soft Wheat in the Moroccan Semi-Arid

Q4 Environmental Science
Hiba Et-Tayeb, Khalid Ibno Namr, El Houssine El Mzouri, Bouchra El Bourhrami, R. Moussadek
{"title":"Tillage, Residues Management, and Nitrogen Fertilization Effects on Soil Organic Status, Soil Quality, and Soft Wheat in the Moroccan Semi-Arid","authors":"Hiba Et-Tayeb, Khalid Ibno Namr, El Houssine El Mzouri, Bouchra El Bourhrami, R. Moussadek","doi":"10.12912/27197050/145962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable management of agricultural practices can improve soil organic status, soil quality (SQ), and yields. The study was conducted to test the impact of tillage (conventional (CT) and no-till (NT)), residues (vetch (C1) and uncover soil (C0)), and three nitrogen (N) fertilization rates (30, 60, and 90 N kg ha -1) on soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (N), C/N ratio, soft wheat yields and SQ. The experiment was established in 2010 in the Moroccan semi-arid. After ten years, the SOC concentration was greater under NT (9.4 g/kg) compared to CT (8.4 g/kg). Crop residues also enhanced SOC (10 g/kg) contrary to C0 (8.1 g/kg). Application of N fertilization showed profound effects on total N, increasing levels of N fertilization led to higher total N irrespective of tillage. Crop residues increased total N (0.6 g/kg) better than C0 plots at the horizon 20–40 cm. Soft wheat revealed an improvement under NT (4213.8 kg ha-1) versus CT (3785.6 kg ha-1) and it responded positively to the N application. For SQ evaluation through the indexing methods (SQI), principal component analysis was done for eight soil indicators to select the minimum data set (MDS), which were subsequently normalized and integrated into the SQI, additive (SQIANL), and weighted (SQIWNL). NT revealed higher scores (0.52; 0.6) than the CT (0.46; 0.53) for SQIANL and SQIWNL, respectively, at the horizon 0–20 cm. the residues layer on the soil surface improved SQIWNL score (0.59) compared to C0 (0.55). Moreover, the correlation (r) with yield and the sensitivity (S), allowed us to choose SQIWNL, as the best index (highest r and S) to evaluate SQ under different practices studied. Indeed, SQIWNL revealed an intermediate SQ under NT and at C1treatments, compared to CT and C0 (low SQ).","PeriodicalId":52648,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering Environmental Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering Environmental Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/145962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Sustainable management of agricultural practices can improve soil organic status, soil quality (SQ), and yields. The study was conducted to test the impact of tillage (conventional (CT) and no-till (NT)), residues (vetch (C1) and uncover soil (C0)), and three nitrogen (N) fertilization rates (30, 60, and 90 N kg ha -1) on soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (N), C/N ratio, soft wheat yields and SQ. The experiment was established in 2010 in the Moroccan semi-arid. After ten years, the SOC concentration was greater under NT (9.4 g/kg) compared to CT (8.4 g/kg). Crop residues also enhanced SOC (10 g/kg) contrary to C0 (8.1 g/kg). Application of N fertilization showed profound effects on total N, increasing levels of N fertilization led to higher total N irrespective of tillage. Crop residues increased total N (0.6 g/kg) better than C0 plots at the horizon 20–40 cm. Soft wheat revealed an improvement under NT (4213.8 kg ha-1) versus CT (3785.6 kg ha-1) and it responded positively to the N application. For SQ evaluation through the indexing methods (SQI), principal component analysis was done for eight soil indicators to select the minimum data set (MDS), which were subsequently normalized and integrated into the SQI, additive (SQIANL), and weighted (SQIWNL). NT revealed higher scores (0.52; 0.6) than the CT (0.46; 0.53) for SQIANL and SQIWNL, respectively, at the horizon 0–20 cm. the residues layer on the soil surface improved SQIWNL score (0.59) compared to C0 (0.55). Moreover, the correlation (r) with yield and the sensitivity (S), allowed us to choose SQIWNL, as the best index (highest r and S) to evaluate SQ under different practices studied. Indeed, SQIWNL revealed an intermediate SQ under NT and at C1treatments, compared to CT and C0 (low SQ).
摩洛哥半干旱地区耕作、残茬管理和氮肥对土壤有机状况、土壤质量和软质小麦的影响
农业实践的可持续管理可以改善土壤有机状态、土壤质量和产量。本研究旨在测试耕作(常规(CT)和免耕(NT))、残留物(vetch(C1)和裸露土壤(C0))和三种氮(N)施肥量(30、60和90N kg ha-1)对土壤有机碳(SOC)、总氮(氮)、C/N比、软小麦产量和SQ的影响。该试验于2010年在摩洛哥半干旱地区建立。十年后,与CT(8.4 g/kg)相比,NT(9.4 g/kg)下的SOC浓度更高。与C0(8.1 g/kg)相反,作物残留物也提高了SOC(10 g/kg)。施用氮肥对总氮有显著影响,无论耕作方式如何,增加氮肥水平都会导致总氮增加。在20–40 cm的水平上,作物残留物比C0地块更好地增加了总氮(0.6 g/kg)。软小麦在NT(4213.8 kg ha-1)和CT(3785.6 kg ha-1。对于通过指数化方法(SQI)进行的SQ评估,对8个土壤指标进行了主成分分析,以选择最小数据集(MDS),随后将其归一化并整合到SQI、加性(SQIANL)和加权(SQIWNL)中。在0~20 cm范围内,NT显示SQIANL和SQIWNL的得分(0.52;0.6)分别高于CT(0.46;0.53)。与C0(0.55)相比,土壤表面的残留物层提高了SQIWNL得分(0.59)。此外,与产量和敏感性(S)的相关性(r)使我们能够选择SQIWNL作为评估不同实践下SQ的最佳指标(最高r和S)。事实上,与CT和C0(低SQ)相比,SQIWNL在NT和C1治疗下显示中等SQ。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecological Engineering  Environmental Technology
Ecological Engineering Environmental Technology Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信