Emirs in London: Subaltern Travel and Nigeria's Modernity by Moses Ochonu (review)

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN
Oliver Coates
{"title":"Emirs in London: Subaltern Travel and Nigeria's Modernity by Moses Ochonu (review)","authors":"Oliver Coates","doi":"10.2979/reseafrilite.53.2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"northern Ugandans in their use of memorialization and demands on the state for “living memorials” (252) that respond to their material needs. A different approach is taken in the book’s final chapter in which, drawing on her own experience running theater workshops in northern Uganda and Rwanda, Edmondson searches for new models of theater activism detached from its “humanitarian baggage” (287). Since, she argues, “neoliberal pressures are more easily negotiated than opposed” (271), staying at home is not an option. Instead she seeks to offer Western theater activists a guide to avoiding those pitfalls of empire discussed in the preceding chapters and tentatively concludes, borrowing from Emmanuel Lévinas, that a stance of “radical passivity” (276)—involving shared vulnerability, open-ended collaboration, and the acceptation of inaction—might be a useful, if sometimes elusive, point of departure from which to develop a more ethical approach to intercultural performance outside of the influence of empire. This explicit identification of an imagined reader in the closing pages echoes the emphasis on the perspectives of Western agents found throughout the book. While the range of source types studied is impressive, encompassing a broad variety of documents that includes the BBC documentary Rwanda’s Untold Story, the memoirs of genocide survivor Immaculée Ilibagiza, and Lynn Nottage’s play Ruined, the early assertion that “the creative expressions of Central Africans take center stage” (10) is perhaps not fully realized, with the stimulating discussion of artists such as Judith Adong and Faustin Linyekula confined to a brief afterword. Edmondson envisages further study of these artists in a future book, but arguably a more detailed discussion of their strategies for evading the forces of state and empire would have been pertinent to this present work. Nonetheless, Performing Trauma in Central Africa offers a fascinating and highly readable interdisciplinary exploration of the insidious workings of imperial appetite in Central Africa, as seen from the standpoint of empire, which will be of great interest to regional specialists and scholars of applied theater, memory studies, and humanitarianism alike.","PeriodicalId":21021,"journal":{"name":"Research in African Literatures","volume":"53 1","pages":"194 - 196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in African Literatures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/reseafrilite.53.2.15","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

northern Ugandans in their use of memorialization and demands on the state for “living memorials” (252) that respond to their material needs. A different approach is taken in the book’s final chapter in which, drawing on her own experience running theater workshops in northern Uganda and Rwanda, Edmondson searches for new models of theater activism detached from its “humanitarian baggage” (287). Since, she argues, “neoliberal pressures are more easily negotiated than opposed” (271), staying at home is not an option. Instead she seeks to offer Western theater activists a guide to avoiding those pitfalls of empire discussed in the preceding chapters and tentatively concludes, borrowing from Emmanuel Lévinas, that a stance of “radical passivity” (276)—involving shared vulnerability, open-ended collaboration, and the acceptation of inaction—might be a useful, if sometimes elusive, point of departure from which to develop a more ethical approach to intercultural performance outside of the influence of empire. This explicit identification of an imagined reader in the closing pages echoes the emphasis on the perspectives of Western agents found throughout the book. While the range of source types studied is impressive, encompassing a broad variety of documents that includes the BBC documentary Rwanda’s Untold Story, the memoirs of genocide survivor Immaculée Ilibagiza, and Lynn Nottage’s play Ruined, the early assertion that “the creative expressions of Central Africans take center stage” (10) is perhaps not fully realized, with the stimulating discussion of artists such as Judith Adong and Faustin Linyekula confined to a brief afterword. Edmondson envisages further study of these artists in a future book, but arguably a more detailed discussion of their strategies for evading the forces of state and empire would have been pertinent to this present work. Nonetheless, Performing Trauma in Central Africa offers a fascinating and highly readable interdisciplinary exploration of the insidious workings of imperial appetite in Central Africa, as seen from the standpoint of empire, which will be of great interest to regional specialists and scholars of applied theater, memory studies, and humanitarianism alike.
埃米尔在伦敦:下层旅行与尼日利亚的现代性摩西·奥乔努著(书评)
乌干达人对纪念物的使用以及对国家“活的纪念物”的要求(252),以满足他们的物质需求。在书的最后一章中,埃德蒙森采用了一种不同的方法,她借鉴自己在乌干达北部和卢旺达举办戏剧研讨会的经验,寻找脱离“人道主义包袱”的戏剧激进主义新模式(287)。她认为,由于“新自由主义压力比反对更容易谈判”(271),留在家里不是一种选择。相反,她试图为西方戏剧活动家提供一个避免前几章中讨论的帝国陷阱的指南,并借用埃马纽埃尔·莱维纳斯的话,试探性地得出结论,“激进被动”(276)的立场——包括共同的脆弱性、开放式的合作和接受不作为——可能是有用的,从这个出发点出发,在帝国的影响之外,发展一种更合乎道德的跨文化表演方法。在最后几页中,这种对想象中的读者的明确识别,呼应了整本书对西方特工视角的强调。虽然所研究的来源类型令人印象深刻,包括各种各样的文件,包括BBC纪录片《卢旺达不为人知的故事》、种族灭绝幸存者伊马库莱·伊利巴吉扎的回忆录和林恩·诺蒂奇的戏剧《废墟》,但“中非人的创造性表达占据了中心舞台”(10)的早期断言可能还没有完全实现,Judith Adong和Faustin Linyekula等艺术家的精彩讨论仅限于简短的后记。埃德蒙森设想在未来的一本书中对这些艺术家进行进一步的研究,但可以说,对他们逃避国家和帝国力量的策略进行更详细的讨论将与本书有关。尽管如此,《在中非表演创伤》从帝国的角度对中非帝国欲望的阴险运作进行了引人入胜、可读性强的跨学科探索,这将引起应用戏剧、记忆研究和人道主义领域的地区专家和学者的极大兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Research in African Literatures
Research in African Literatures LITERATURE, AFRICAN, AUSTRALIAN, CANADIAN-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Founded in 1970, Research in African Literatures is the premier journal of African literary studies worldwide and provides a forum in English for research on the oral and written literatures of Africa, as well as information on African publishing, announcements of importance to Africanists, and notes and queries of literary interest. Reviews of current scholarly books are included in every issue, often presented as review essays, and a forum offers readers the opportunity to respond to issues raised in articles and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信