Design Records Appraisal Tool

Q3 Arts and Humanities
A. Leventhal, Jody Thompson, A. Anderson, Sarah Schubert, Andi Altenbach
{"title":"Design Records Appraisal Tool","authors":"A. Leventhal, Jody Thompson, A. Anderson, Sarah Schubert, Andi Altenbach","doi":"10.17723/0360-9081-84.2.320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A common obstacle during the appraisal of design records is the specialized vernacular creators use to describe them. As a result, archival professionals may feel unprepared for discussions with potential donors while acquiring these distinct and sometimes problematic materials. Using authoritative architectural and archival sources, the authors expanded on existing literature to develop appraisal grid templates that generally align with different collecting institutions' missions and overarching development and retention policies and created a consolidated and comprehensive glossary of design phases, categories, and definitions to use as a reference. The authors hope that this resource will assist those who are unfamiliar with the design process to interpret disparate design record types, to inform the appraisal process, and ultimately, to make accessioning decisions.","PeriodicalId":39979,"journal":{"name":"American Archivist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Archivist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081-84.2.320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A common obstacle during the appraisal of design records is the specialized vernacular creators use to describe them. As a result, archival professionals may feel unprepared for discussions with potential donors while acquiring these distinct and sometimes problematic materials. Using authoritative architectural and archival sources, the authors expanded on existing literature to develop appraisal grid templates that generally align with different collecting institutions' missions and overarching development and retention policies and created a consolidated and comprehensive glossary of design phases, categories, and definitions to use as a reference. The authors hope that this resource will assist those who are unfamiliar with the design process to interpret disparate design record types, to inform the appraisal process, and ultimately, to make accessioning decisions.
设计记录评估工具
在评估设计记录的过程中,一个常见的障碍是创作者用来描述它们的专门的白话。因此,档案专业人员在获得这些独特的、有时有问题的材料时,可能会对与潜在捐助者的讨论感到措手不及。使用权威的建筑和档案资源,作者扩展了现有的文献,开发了评估网格模板,这些模板通常与不同的收集机构的任务和总体开发和保留策略相一致,并创建了一个统一的、全面的设计阶段、类别和定义词汇表,作为参考。作者希望这个资源将帮助那些不熟悉设计过程的人解释不同的设计记录类型,告知评估过程,并最终做出加入决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Archivist
American Archivist Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信