Descriptive Study of Safety and Health Training Content in Iranian Universities and Higher Education Institutes

Masoomeh Vahabi, M. Pouyakian, Zahra Mohammadi, Ghasem Hesam, Hossein AFIFEHZADEH KASHANI
{"title":"Descriptive Study of Safety and Health Training Content in Iranian Universities and Higher Education Institutes","authors":"Masoomeh Vahabi, M. Pouyakian, Zahra Mohammadi, Ghasem Hesam, Hossein AFIFEHZADEH KASHANI","doi":"10.18502/ijoh.v13i2.8371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The root cause of many workplace incidents is the lack of knowledge on occupational safety and health principles. Despite the safety and health authorities in organizations, safety and health is the general responsibility of all other experts working in an organization. Experts and managers are expected to think, decide and work safely in workplaces. However, we don’t have enough information about the level of safety and health-related education when they were in universities. In addition, there is not too much reliable published reports on the academic teaching of safety and health courses and syllabus in higher education in Iran. Therefore, the current study was aimed to provide a general view of the status of occupational safety and health teaching subjects in different academic disciplines (excluding specialized fields in occupational safety and health) in the Iranian higher educational system. Firstly, the latest edition of the entire program (curricula) of all academic disciplines held in Iranian universities was downloaded. Secondly, the required information, including discipline title, program’s degree, number of required (core) and elective (non-core) courses, and program’s date of approval, were recorded in an Excel sheet. Every course’s title and syllabus were then studied to find out any safety and health-related topics. Finally, data were analyzed and reported. 251 academic disciplines in the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME) and 771 disciplines in the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (MSRT) were investigated. Most of the curriculums have been revised by both ministries since 2011. Results showed that 20 percent of the MOHME‎ ‎disciplines and 10.4 percent of MSRT‎ disciplines were included in the occupational safety and health courses. The number of courses with health and safety content (syllabus outline) in the MOHME ‎‎and the MSRT‎ were 168 and 173. Most health and safety courses presented in the MOHME academic majors were in the basic medical sciences category of disciplines. A majority of MSRT covered academic safety and health courses and topics were presented in the engineering category of disciplines. Presenting lessons with health and safety content at the MOHME ‎was more practical than that of the MSRT. The quality and quantity of teaching on safety and health topic were not at satisfactory levels. Revising the course syllabus of the academic disciplines and adding theoretical and practical courses related to each field's specific health and safety curriculum can make a significant contribution in improving the general knowledge of the safety and health of the university graduates. In turn, it improves future workplace safety and health conditions, managers’ insights and decision-makers on the importance of safety and health at work. It protects the people's life and the property of the organization.","PeriodicalId":52667,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Occupational Hygiene","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Occupational Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijoh.v13i2.8371","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The root cause of many workplace incidents is the lack of knowledge on occupational safety and health principles. Despite the safety and health authorities in organizations, safety and health is the general responsibility of all other experts working in an organization. Experts and managers are expected to think, decide and work safely in workplaces. However, we don’t have enough information about the level of safety and health-related education when they were in universities. In addition, there is not too much reliable published reports on the academic teaching of safety and health courses and syllabus in higher education in Iran. Therefore, the current study was aimed to provide a general view of the status of occupational safety and health teaching subjects in different academic disciplines (excluding specialized fields in occupational safety and health) in the Iranian higher educational system. Firstly, the latest edition of the entire program (curricula) of all academic disciplines held in Iranian universities was downloaded. Secondly, the required information, including discipline title, program’s degree, number of required (core) and elective (non-core) courses, and program’s date of approval, were recorded in an Excel sheet. Every course’s title and syllabus were then studied to find out any safety and health-related topics. Finally, data were analyzed and reported. 251 academic disciplines in the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME) and 771 disciplines in the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (MSRT) were investigated. Most of the curriculums have been revised by both ministries since 2011. Results showed that 20 percent of the MOHME‎ ‎disciplines and 10.4 percent of MSRT‎ disciplines were included in the occupational safety and health courses. The number of courses with health and safety content (syllabus outline) in the MOHME ‎‎and the MSRT‎ were 168 and 173. Most health and safety courses presented in the MOHME academic majors were in the basic medical sciences category of disciplines. A majority of MSRT covered academic safety and health courses and topics were presented in the engineering category of disciplines. Presenting lessons with health and safety content at the MOHME ‎was more practical than that of the MSRT. The quality and quantity of teaching on safety and health topic were not at satisfactory levels. Revising the course syllabus of the academic disciplines and adding theoretical and practical courses related to each field's specific health and safety curriculum can make a significant contribution in improving the general knowledge of the safety and health of the university graduates. In turn, it improves future workplace safety and health conditions, managers’ insights and decision-makers on the importance of safety and health at work. It protects the people's life and the property of the organization.
伊朗大学和高等教育机构安全与健康培训内容的描述性研究
许多工作场所事故的根本原因是缺乏职业安全和健康原则方面的知识。尽管组织中有安全和健康部门,但安全和健康是组织中所有其他专家的总体责任。专家和管理人员应在工作场所进行安全思考、决策和工作。然而,我们没有足够的信息来了解他们在大学时的安全和健康教育水平。此外,关于伊朗高等教育中安全与健康课程和教学大纲的学术教学,没有太多可靠的公开报告。因此,本研究旨在对伊朗高等教育系统中不同学科(不包括职业安全与健康专业领域)的职业安全与卫生教学科目的现状提供一个总体看法。首先,下载了伊朗大学所有学科的最新版本的整个课程。其次,将所需信息,包括学科名称、课程学位、必修(核心)和选修(非核心)课程的数量以及课程的批准日期,记录在Excel表中。然后研究每门课程的标题和教学大纲,找出任何安全和健康相关的主题。最后,对数据进行了分析和报告。对卫生和医学教育部251个学科和科学、研究和技术部771个学科进行了调查。自2011年以来,这两个部委对大部分课程进行了修订。结果显示,20%的MOHME‎ ‎学科和10.4%的MSRT‎ 职业安全与健康课程包含了相关学科。MOHME中包含健康和安全内容(教学大纲)的课程数量‎‎和MSRT‎ 分别为168和173。MOHME学术专业开设的大多数健康和安全课程都属于基础医学学科类别。MSRT涵盖的大多数学术安全与健康课程和主题都在工程类学科中介绍。在MOHME上介绍健康和安全内容的课程‎比MSRT更实用。安全与健康专题的教学质量和数量都不尽如人意。修改学术学科的课程大纲,增加与每个领域特定的健康和安全课程相关的理论和实践课程,可以为提高大学毕业生的安全和健康常识做出重大贡献。反过来,它改善了未来工作场所的安全和健康状况,改善了管理者对工作安全和健康重要性的见解和决策者。它保护人民的生命和组织的财产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信