{"title":"How epistemic anxiety and curiosity link perceived value and intended efforts in the language classroom","authors":"Nicola Fraschini, Yu Tao","doi":"10.1017/S0267190523000041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Language learner anxiety—and emotions in general—has constantly attracted academic attention in the second language acquisition (SLA) field for almost 40 years (Plonsky et al., 2022). However, within the context of the foreign language classroom, epistemic emotions remain understudied, despite their demonstrated effects on performance (D'Mello et al., 2014) and learners’ cognitive processes (Muis et al., 2018a). Epistemic emotions are academic emotions that “relate to knowledge-generating qualities of cognitive tasks and activities” (Pekrun et al., 2017, p. 1268). Their object focus lies in the generation of knowledge (Vogl et al., 2019a) and therefore are prominent during learning activities in academic settings. Recent research in SLA shows that epistemic emotions play a considerable role in instructed language learning (Fraschini, 2023; Nakamura et al., 2022). This current study analyses how two common epistemic emotions—epistemic anxiety and curiosity—mediate the link between a learner's perceived value and intended effort. Empirical data was collected using a tailor-designed survey administered to learners of Korean as a foreign language enrolled in a hybrid university course. Results show that epistemic anxiety and curiosity are independent of each other and coexist during language learning tasks. Furthermore, both epistemic emotions significantly correlate to a learner's perceived value of language learning, with opposite effects. While learners with a higher perceived value tend to be more curious, they also appear less anxious. These results are further discussed considering teachers’ and learners’ characteristics and in relation to theoretical and pedagogical implications for the language classroom.","PeriodicalId":47490,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Applied Linguistics","volume":"43 1","pages":"23 - 40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190523000041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Language learner anxiety—and emotions in general—has constantly attracted academic attention in the second language acquisition (SLA) field for almost 40 years (Plonsky et al., 2022). However, within the context of the foreign language classroom, epistemic emotions remain understudied, despite their demonstrated effects on performance (D'Mello et al., 2014) and learners’ cognitive processes (Muis et al., 2018a). Epistemic emotions are academic emotions that “relate to knowledge-generating qualities of cognitive tasks and activities” (Pekrun et al., 2017, p. 1268). Their object focus lies in the generation of knowledge (Vogl et al., 2019a) and therefore are prominent during learning activities in academic settings. Recent research in SLA shows that epistemic emotions play a considerable role in instructed language learning (Fraschini, 2023; Nakamura et al., 2022). This current study analyses how two common epistemic emotions—epistemic anxiety and curiosity—mediate the link between a learner's perceived value and intended effort. Empirical data was collected using a tailor-designed survey administered to learners of Korean as a foreign language enrolled in a hybrid university course. Results show that epistemic anxiety and curiosity are independent of each other and coexist during language learning tasks. Furthermore, both epistemic emotions significantly correlate to a learner's perceived value of language learning, with opposite effects. While learners with a higher perceived value tend to be more curious, they also appear less anxious. These results are further discussed considering teachers’ and learners’ characteristics and in relation to theoretical and pedagogical implications for the language classroom.
摘要近40年来,语言学习者的焦虑和情绪一直吸引着第二语言习得领域的学术关注(Plonsky et al.,2022)。然而,在外语课堂的背景下,尽管认知情绪对表现(D’Mello et al.,2014)和学习者的认知过程(Muis et al.,2018a)产生了明显的影响,但认知情绪仍然没有得到充分的研究。认知情绪是“与认知任务和活动的知识生成质量有关”的学术情绪(Pekrun et al.,2017,p.1268)。他们的目标关注点在于知识的生成(Vogl et al.,2019a),因此在学术环境中的学习活动中尤为突出。最近对SLA的研究表明,认知情绪在指导语言学习中发挥着相当大的作用(Fraschini,2023;Nakamura等人,2022)。目前的这项研究分析了两种常见的认知情绪——认知焦虑和好奇心——如何介导学习者的感知价值和预期努力之间的联系。实证数据是通过一项专门设计的调查收集的,该调查针对的是参加混合大学课程的韩语学习者。结果表明,在语言学习任务中,认知焦虑和好奇心是相互独立、共存的。此外,这两种认知情绪与学习者对语言学习的感知价值显著相关,具有相反的效果。虽然感知价值较高的学习者往往更好奇,但他们也显得不那么焦虑。考虑到教师和学习者的特点,并结合语言课堂的理论和教学意义,进一步讨论了这些结果。
期刊介绍:
The Annual Review of Applied Linguistics publishes research on key topics in the broad field of applied linguistics. Each issue is thematic, providing a variety of perspectives on the topic through research summaries, critical overviews, position papers and empirical studies. Being responsive to the field, some issues are tied to the theme of that year''s annual conference of the American Association for Applied Linguistics. Also, at regular intervals an issue will take the approach of covering applied linguistics as a field more broadly, including coverage of critical or controversial topics. ARAL provides cutting-edge and timely articles on a wide number of areas, including language learning and pedagogy, second language acquisition, sociolinguistics, language policy and planning, language assessment, and research design and methodology, to name just a few.