Strengths use and deficit improvement of first-year university students: A structural model for social support and student outcomes

IF 0.8 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
K. Mostert, Charlize Du Toit
{"title":"Strengths use and deficit improvement of first-year university students: A structural model for social support and student outcomes","authors":"K. Mostert, Charlize Du Toit","doi":"10.1080/14330237.2023.2233205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to examine first-year students’ proactive behaviour towards strengths use (PBSU) and deficit improvement (PBDI), their relationship with students’ social support and essential student outcomes (student burnout, student engagement, life satisfaction, satisfaction with studies, study–course fit and intention to drop out). A sample of first-year students (N = 776; 19–20 years = 67%; female = 62%; black = 58%) from a large South African university completed the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire; the Maslach Burnout Inventory–Student Survey (MBI–SS); as well as measures of present social support, engagement, satisfaction with life, person-study-course fit and intention to drop out. Structural equation modelling was used to test the relationships among the variables in the structural model using Mplus 8.6. Overall, this study’s findings show that PBSU and PBDI are significantly related, with the exception that support from parents did not predict deficit improvement and PBDI did not predict intention to drop out. The results further show that PBSU was much more strongly related to support from parents, cynicism, life satisfaction, satisfaction with studies, study-course fit and intention to drop out. In contrast, PBDI was much more strongly related to support from significant others, exhaustion and engagement. The results confirm that engaging in proactive behaviour towards strengths use and deficit improvement may result in positive student outcomes. The findings of this study suggest a need for university institutions to implement initiatives to promote social support programmes for students to leverage their strengths, creating learning environments conducive to student success.","PeriodicalId":46959,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychology in Africa","volume":"33 1","pages":"368 - 377"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychology in Africa","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2023.2233205","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to examine first-year students’ proactive behaviour towards strengths use (PBSU) and deficit improvement (PBDI), their relationship with students’ social support and essential student outcomes (student burnout, student engagement, life satisfaction, satisfaction with studies, study–course fit and intention to drop out). A sample of first-year students (N = 776; 19–20 years = 67%; female = 62%; black = 58%) from a large South African university completed the Strengths Use and Deficit Correction (SUDCO) questionnaire; the Maslach Burnout Inventory–Student Survey (MBI–SS); as well as measures of present social support, engagement, satisfaction with life, person-study-course fit and intention to drop out. Structural equation modelling was used to test the relationships among the variables in the structural model using Mplus 8.6. Overall, this study’s findings show that PBSU and PBDI are significantly related, with the exception that support from parents did not predict deficit improvement and PBDI did not predict intention to drop out. The results further show that PBSU was much more strongly related to support from parents, cynicism, life satisfaction, satisfaction with studies, study-course fit and intention to drop out. In contrast, PBDI was much more strongly related to support from significant others, exhaustion and engagement. The results confirm that engaging in proactive behaviour towards strengths use and deficit improvement may result in positive student outcomes. The findings of this study suggest a need for university institutions to implement initiatives to promote social support programmes for students to leverage their strengths, creating learning environments conducive to student success.
大学一年级学生的优势使用和劣势改善:社会支持和学生成绩的结构模型
本研究旨在调查一年级学生对优势使用(PBSU)和缺陷改善(PBDI)的积极行为,以及他们与学生社会支持和基本学生成果(学生倦怠、学生参与度、生活满意度、学习满意度、学习-课程适合性和辍学意向)的关系。来自南非一所大型大学的一年级学生样本(N=776;19-20岁=67%;女性=62%;黑人=58%)完成了优势使用和缺陷纠正(SUDCO)问卷;Maslach倦怠量表-学生调查(MBI-SS);以及当前社会支持、参与度、生活满意度、个人学习课程适合度和辍学意愿的测量。结构方程建模用于使用Mplus 8.6测试结构模型中变量之间的关系。总的来说,这项研究的结果表明,PBSU和PBDI显著相关,除了父母的支持不能预测赤字改善,PBDI不能预测辍学意向。结果进一步表明,PBSU与父母的支持、玩世不恭、生活满意度、学习满意度、学习课程适合度和辍学意向的关系更为密切。相比之下,PBDI与重要他人的支持、疲惫和参与的关系要密切得多。研究结果证实,对优势的使用和缺陷的改善采取积极主动的行为可能会给学生带来积极的结果。这项研究的结果表明,大学机构有必要实施举措,促进学生利用自身优势的社会支持计划,创造有利于学生成功的学习环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychology in Africa
Journal of Psychology in Africa PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
62
期刊介绍: Findings from psychological research in Africa and related regions needs a forum for better dissemination and utilisation in the context of development. Special emphasis is placed on the consideration of African, African-American, Asian, Caribbean, and Hispanic-Latino realities and problems. Contributions should attempt a synthesis of emic and etic methodologies and applications. The Journal of Psychology in Africa includes original articles, review articles, book reviews, commentaries, special issues, case analyses, reports and announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信