Can we sell something people don’t want?

IF 0.3 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
R. Cerfolio
{"title":"Can we sell something people don’t want?","authors":"R. Cerfolio","doi":"10.21037/VATS-21-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"© Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved. Video-assist Thorac Surg 2021 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/vats-21-8 Performing thoracic surgery in a patient who is not intubated under general anesthesia is an exciting idea. When I first heard and saw in earlier 2000 I was genuinely excited and sanguine for its promise. Finally, there was something new in our specialty and at our international meetings. An innovation. A game changer. On paper, it looked like a “can’t miss” disruptive technological advance. A true paradigm shift. Some thought it would quickly revolutionize how thoracic surgery was performed. Think of the all of the theoretical advantages it conveys, such as: the avoidance of muscle paralysis and the incumbent hemodynamic fluctuations and post-operative muscle pain that many patients experience, the elimination of intubation and the placement of a double-lumen tube which for the uninitiated takes significant time and has risk, the mitigation of atelectasis of one lung during the operation and thus the improved PaO2, the elimination of the need to reserve anesthetic agents and extubation that often causes large swings in intra-thoracic pressure and the propagation of air leaks, etc. Yet, despite these many theoretical advantages some of which have been shown to be true, it has not been widely accepted. Flash-forward 19 years later and how is its adoption? Non-intubated thoracic surgery or non-intubated minimally invasive pulmonary resection using video-assisted thoracoscopic techniques (VATS) or robotic techniques is rarely chosen, especially in the United States despite the fact that the concept has advantages and has been around for a long time. Why? The answer is simple. The consumers, the patients, the surgeons and the anesthesiologists do not want to do it. It is hard to sell something that the consumer does not want even if it “may be better for you.” Its marketing is poor to say the least. Before we explore the consumer part of this equation let’s see the actual data that may or may not support the purported advantages. The data","PeriodicalId":42086,"journal":{"name":"Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/VATS-21-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

© Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved. Video-assist Thorac Surg 2021 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/vats-21-8 Performing thoracic surgery in a patient who is not intubated under general anesthesia is an exciting idea. When I first heard and saw in earlier 2000 I was genuinely excited and sanguine for its promise. Finally, there was something new in our specialty and at our international meetings. An innovation. A game changer. On paper, it looked like a “can’t miss” disruptive technological advance. A true paradigm shift. Some thought it would quickly revolutionize how thoracic surgery was performed. Think of the all of the theoretical advantages it conveys, such as: the avoidance of muscle paralysis and the incumbent hemodynamic fluctuations and post-operative muscle pain that many patients experience, the elimination of intubation and the placement of a double-lumen tube which for the uninitiated takes significant time and has risk, the mitigation of atelectasis of one lung during the operation and thus the improved PaO2, the elimination of the need to reserve anesthetic agents and extubation that often causes large swings in intra-thoracic pressure and the propagation of air leaks, etc. Yet, despite these many theoretical advantages some of which have been shown to be true, it has not been widely accepted. Flash-forward 19 years later and how is its adoption? Non-intubated thoracic surgery or non-intubated minimally invasive pulmonary resection using video-assisted thoracoscopic techniques (VATS) or robotic techniques is rarely chosen, especially in the United States despite the fact that the concept has advantages and has been around for a long time. Why? The answer is simple. The consumers, the patients, the surgeons and the anesthesiologists do not want to do it. It is hard to sell something that the consumer does not want even if it “may be better for you.” Its marketing is poor to say the least. Before we explore the consumer part of this equation let’s see the actual data that may or may not support the purported advantages. The data
我们能卖一些人们不想要的东西吗?
©视频辅助胸外科。版权所有。视频辅助胸外科手术2021 | http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/vats-21-8在全身麻醉下不插管的病人中进行胸外科手术是一个令人兴奋的想法。当我在2000年初第一次听到和看到它的时候,我真的很兴奋,对它的前景很乐观。最后,在我们的专业和我们的国际会议上有了一些新的东西。一个创新。游戏规则改变者。从纸面上看,这是一项“不容错过”的颠覆性技术进步。这是一次真正的范式转变。一些人认为这将很快彻底改变胸外科手术的实施方式。想想它所传达的所有理论优势,比如:避免了许多患者经历的肌肉麻痹和现有的血流动力学波动和术后肌肉疼痛,消除了插管和放置双腔管,这对新手来说需要大量时间和风险,减轻了手术期间一个肺的不张,从而改善了PaO2,消除了保留麻醉剂和拔管的需要,这些通常会导致胸内压力的大幅波动和漏气的传播等。然而,尽管有许多理论上的优点,其中一些已被证明是正确的,但它尚未被广泛接受。19年后的今天,它的采用情况如何?使用视频辅助胸腔镜技术(VATS)或机器人技术的非插管胸外科手术或非插管微创肺切除术很少被选择,特别是在美国,尽管该概念具有优势并且已经存在了很长时间。为什么?答案很简单。消费者、病人、外科医生和麻醉师都不想这么做。很难把消费者不想要的东西卖出去,即使它“可能对你更好”。至少可以说,它的营销很糟糕。在我们探讨这个等式的消费者部分之前,让我们看看实际数据,这些数据可能支持也可能不支持所谓的优势。的数据
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信