The Accredited University of Tomorrow: Accreditation, Creativity and International Recognition

Emil Gjorgov, Jeremy Cripps
{"title":"The Accredited University of Tomorrow: Accreditation, Creativity and International Recognition","authors":"Emil Gjorgov, Jeremy Cripps","doi":"10.17265/1537-1514/2018.02.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous challenges have impeded the Bologna process which was designed to provide guidelines for the establishment of appropriate academic standards at the university level. The Bologna process was expected to include a set of standards for the creation of independent accrediting bodies to provide accreditation for universities and higher colleges of education in the European Union, so that the work of students might be recorded and accepted as transferable among universities accepting the Bologna process. This paper provides initially a reflection on the nature and importance of accreditation standards. This follows consideration of the demands for transparency and accountability and consideration of the problems of recognizing transferable credits which are faced by higher educational institutions in Europe. The value and the benefits which derive from acceptable standards for institutional accreditation are identified. Identification is then followed by description of the five standards which will move the accreditation introverts in Europe to the more extravert approach being taken by universities in the United States and the rest of the world.","PeriodicalId":65561,"journal":{"name":"美中经济评论:英文版","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"美中经济评论:英文版","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17265/1537-1514/2018.02.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Numerous challenges have impeded the Bologna process which was designed to provide guidelines for the establishment of appropriate academic standards at the university level. The Bologna process was expected to include a set of standards for the creation of independent accrediting bodies to provide accreditation for universities and higher colleges of education in the European Union, so that the work of students might be recorded and accepted as transferable among universities accepting the Bologna process. This paper provides initially a reflection on the nature and importance of accreditation standards. This follows consideration of the demands for transparency and accountability and consideration of the problems of recognizing transferable credits which are faced by higher educational institutions in Europe. The value and the benefits which derive from acceptable standards for institutional accreditation are identified. Identification is then followed by description of the five standards which will move the accreditation introverts in Europe to the more extravert approach being taken by universities in the United States and the rest of the world.
认可的未来大学:认证,创造力和国际认可
许多挑战阻碍了博洛尼亚进程,该进程旨在为在大学一级建立适当的学术标准提供指导方针。博洛尼亚进程预计将包括一套标准,用于建立独立的认证机构,为欧盟的大学和高等教育学院提供认证,以便学生的工作可以被记录下来,并在接受博洛尼亚进程的大学之间被接受为可转让的。本文对认证标准的性质和重要性进行了初步思考。在此之前,考虑了对透明度和问责制的要求,并考虑了欧洲高等教育机构面临的承认可转让学分的问题。确定了可接受的机构认证标准的价值和好处。然后对五个标准进行说明,这五个标准将使欧洲的认证内向者转向美国和世界其他地区的大学正在采取的更外向的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
764
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信