Trends in the Installation of Residential Solar Panelsin California

Candace E. Ybarra, J. Broughton, Prashanth U. Nyer
{"title":"Trends in the Installation of Residential Solar Panelsin California","authors":"Candace E. Ybarra, J. Broughton, Prashanth U. Nyer","doi":"10.4236/lce.2021.112004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines some trends in residential solar panel installations in California. First, we look at the growth in residential solar panel installations in the state and changes in consumption per account. Next, we examine aspects of the proposed changes to the net metering program in the state. Politicians, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), investor owned utility (IOU) companies and other public interest groups are currently involved in a contentious debate on the future of residential solar panel installations in the state of California. The major California IOUs, Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Edison (SCE), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDGE), and others have argued that solar panel installations favor wealthier residential customers at the expense of less wealthy customers. The basis of the argument is that under the current rate structure those with the financial resources to install solar panels are able to avoid paying their share of the fixed costs incurred by utility companies which results in a disproportionate burden on less wealthy customers. IOUs have asked for permission to charge solar customers large additional monthly fees. Some have even called for all the grandfathering protections granted to early solar adopters under the previous and current net metering programs (NEM 1.0 and NEM 2.0) to be withdrawn. Solar companies and residential solar customers have maintained that such moves would destroy the solar industry in the state, cause thousands of job losses, and most importantly, prevent the state from making progress towards its stated carbon neutrality goals. Given this ongoing debate, it is important to examine whether there exists a wealth difference between residential customers in California who have and have not installed solar panels. As an extension of this research, we also went about determining whether climatic conditions impact the solar panel adoption rates. While California is a huge state with varied climatic zones and several utility companies, we focus our analysis on residential customers of SCE who reside in Orange County. The findings and conclusions are generalizable to residential customers throughout the state.","PeriodicalId":91573,"journal":{"name":"Low carbon economy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Low carbon economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/lce.2021.112004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper examines some trends in residential solar panel installations in California. First, we look at the growth in residential solar panel installations in the state and changes in consumption per account. Next, we examine aspects of the proposed changes to the net metering program in the state. Politicians, the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), investor owned utility (IOU) companies and other public interest groups are currently involved in a contentious debate on the future of residential solar panel installations in the state of California. The major California IOUs, Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E), Southern California Edison (SCE), San Diego Gas and Electric (SDGE), and others have argued that solar panel installations favor wealthier residential customers at the expense of less wealthy customers. The basis of the argument is that under the current rate structure those with the financial resources to install solar panels are able to avoid paying their share of the fixed costs incurred by utility companies which results in a disproportionate burden on less wealthy customers. IOUs have asked for permission to charge solar customers large additional monthly fees. Some have even called for all the grandfathering protections granted to early solar adopters under the previous and current net metering programs (NEM 1.0 and NEM 2.0) to be withdrawn. Solar companies and residential solar customers have maintained that such moves would destroy the solar industry in the state, cause thousands of job losses, and most importantly, prevent the state from making progress towards its stated carbon neutrality goals. Given this ongoing debate, it is important to examine whether there exists a wealth difference between residential customers in California who have and have not installed solar panels. As an extension of this research, we also went about determining whether climatic conditions impact the solar panel adoption rates. While California is a huge state with varied climatic zones and several utility companies, we focus our analysis on residential customers of SCE who reside in Orange County. The findings and conclusions are generalizable to residential customers throughout the state.
加州住宅太阳能电池板安装趋势
本文研究了加州住宅太阳能电池板安装的一些趋势。首先,我们看看该州住宅太阳能电池板安装的增长和每个账户的消费变化。接下来,我们将研究该州净计量计划拟议变化的各个方面。政界人士、加州公用事业委员会(CPUC)、投资者所有的公用事业公司(IOU)和其他公共利益团体目前正就加州住宅太阳能电池板安装的未来展开一场激烈的辩论。加州的主要借方,太平洋天然气和电力公司(PG&E)、南加州爱迪生公司(SCE)、圣地亚哥天然气和电力公司(SDGE)以及其他公司都认为,太阳能电池板的安装有利于富裕的住宅客户,而牺牲了不那么富裕的客户的利益。论点的基础是,在目前的费率结构下,那些有财力安装太阳能电池板的人能够避免支付公用事业公司产生的固定成本的份额,这导致不太富裕的客户承担不成比例的负担。欠条已经请求允许向太阳能用户收取大量的额外月费。一些人甚至呼吁取消在以前和现在的净计量计划(NEM 1.0和NEM 2.0)下给予早期太阳能采采者的所有祖父保护。太阳能公司和住宅太阳能用户坚持认为,这些举措将摧毁该州的太阳能产业,导致数千人失业,最重要的是,阻止该州朝着其既定的碳中和目标取得进展。鉴于这一持续的争论,重要的是要检查是否存在贫富差异的住宅客户在加州安装和没有安装太阳能电池板。作为这项研究的延伸,我们还着手确定气候条件是否会影响太阳能电池板的采用率。虽然加州是一个巨大的州,有不同的气候带和几家公用事业公司,但我们的分析重点是居住在奥兰治县的SCE的住宅客户。研究结果和结论可以推广到整个州的住宅客户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信