Effectiveness of non-farm diversification on rural household income – evidence and policy implications from India

Q2 Social Sciences
S. Kapoor, Sanjeev Kapoor
{"title":"Effectiveness of non-farm diversification on rural household income – evidence and policy implications from India","authors":"S. Kapoor, Sanjeev Kapoor","doi":"10.1108/ijdi-03-2021-0065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nDoubling farming households’ income through occupational diversification to the non-farm sector has been advocated to be of paramount importance in an agrarian economy such as India. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the effects of non-farm activities on rural household incomes in four different Indian states by using a propensity score matching technique and developing an endogenous switching model.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research is based on secondary data taken from four quinquennial rounds of employment and unemployment surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organization.\n\n\nFindings\nThe matching results indicate a maximum monthly rise in per capita income of Rs. 60 in Gujarat and a minimum increase of Rs. 18 in Rajasthan among rural households employed in the non-farm sector as compared to the farm sector. The findings confirm that rural non-farm structural diversification cannot be viewed as a blueprint for increasing rural household incomes in different states. Further, it suggests the need to segmenting the different states on the basis of agricultural development for increasing rural incomes.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe study argues that Indian states with a strongly developed farm sector i.e. Gujarat and Punjab are not ideally suited to undergo structural changes in their economic pursuit. The estimates suggest that the transition of rural households from farm to non-farm-sector activities is a very weak strategy in agriculturally developed states of Gujarat and Punjab, whereas non-farm diversification becomes a pivotal strategy for increasing rural household incomes in less agriculturally developed states such as Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. A contrasting point that arises from these evidence is that although diversification to the non-farm sector leads to higher income, but the resultant figures are very scanty.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThe present study contributes to the existing literature by providing evidence and policy implications on rural non-farm diversification in India and its impact on the rural household income. The study can help the policymakers in framing policies aiming at increasing the income of the rural household through the structural transition of the rural economy.\n","PeriodicalId":37830,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Development Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Development Issues","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijdi-03-2021-0065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Doubling farming households’ income through occupational diversification to the non-farm sector has been advocated to be of paramount importance in an agrarian economy such as India. The purpose of this paper is to analyse the effects of non-farm activities on rural household incomes in four different Indian states by using a propensity score matching technique and developing an endogenous switching model. Design/methodology/approach The research is based on secondary data taken from four quinquennial rounds of employment and unemployment surveys conducted by the National Sample Survey Organization. Findings The matching results indicate a maximum monthly rise in per capita income of Rs. 60 in Gujarat and a minimum increase of Rs. 18 in Rajasthan among rural households employed in the non-farm sector as compared to the farm sector. The findings confirm that rural non-farm structural diversification cannot be viewed as a blueprint for increasing rural household incomes in different states. Further, it suggests the need to segmenting the different states on the basis of agricultural development for increasing rural incomes. Research limitations/implications The study argues that Indian states with a strongly developed farm sector i.e. Gujarat and Punjab are not ideally suited to undergo structural changes in their economic pursuit. The estimates suggest that the transition of rural households from farm to non-farm-sector activities is a very weak strategy in agriculturally developed states of Gujarat and Punjab, whereas non-farm diversification becomes a pivotal strategy for increasing rural household incomes in less agriculturally developed states such as Rajasthan and Uttar Pradesh. A contrasting point that arises from these evidence is that although diversification to the non-farm sector leads to higher income, but the resultant figures are very scanty. Originality/value The present study contributes to the existing literature by providing evidence and policy implications on rural non-farm diversification in India and its impact on the rural household income. The study can help the policymakers in framing policies aiming at increasing the income of the rural household through the structural transition of the rural economy.
非农业多样化对农村家庭收入的影响——来自印度的证据和政策启示
在印度这样的农业经济中,通过向非农部门进行职业多样化来实现农业家庭收入翻倍的目标被认为是至关重要的。本文的目的是通过使用倾向得分匹配技术和开发内生转换模型来分析印度四个不同邦的非农活动对农村家庭收入的影响。设计/方法/方法该研究基于国家抽样调查组织进行的四轮五年一次的就业和失业调查的二次数据。结果显示,古吉拉特邦非农业部门就业的农村家庭的人均收入每月最高增长60卢比,最低增长18卢比与农业部门相比。研究结果证实,农村非农结构多样化不能被视为不同州增加农村家庭收入的蓝图。此外,它还建议有必要在农业发展的基础上划分不同的州,以增加农村收入。研究局限性/含义该研究认为,农业部门发达的印度邦,即古吉拉特邦和旁遮普邦,不适合在其经济追求中进行结构性变革。估计表明,在农业发达的古吉拉特邦和旁遮普邦,农村家庭从农业部门活动向非农部门活动的过渡是一项非常薄弱的战略,而在农业欠发达的邦,如拉贾斯坦邦和北方邦,非农多样化成为增加农村家庭收入的关键战略。从这些证据中得出的一个对比点是,尽管非农业部门的多样化会带来更高的收入,但由此产生的数字非常少。原创性/价值本研究为现有文献提供了印度农村非农多样化及其对农村家庭收入影响的证据和政策启示。这项研究可以帮助决策者制定旨在通过农村经济结构转型增加农村家庭收入的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Development Issues
International Journal of Development Issues Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Development Issues (IJDI) publishes scholarly research on important development issues, with a particular focus on development dynamism and a leaning towards inter-disciplinary research. IJDI welcomes papers that are empirically oriented but such work should have solid methodological foundations based on realism and pragmatism rather than on idealism. Critical analysis of development issues from both the heteredox viewpoint and the neo-liberalist viewpoint, in orthodox tradition, are equally encouraged. The journal publishes authoritative, intelligent articles and research of direct relevance to those investigating and/or working within areas closely associated with development processes. Special consideration is given to research papers that consider development issues from either a socio-economic, political, historical or sociological, anthropological, ecological and technological standpoint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信