Social Network Analysis to Examine the Effectiveness of e-PBL with Design Thinking to Foster Collaboration: Comparisons between High and Low Self-regulated Learners

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
N. Nordin, M. Samsudin, Aizul Fared Mansor, Mohd Erfy Ismail
{"title":"Social Network Analysis to Examine the Effectiveness of e-PBL with Design Thinking to Foster Collaboration: Comparisons between High and Low Self-regulated Learners","authors":"N. Nordin, M. Samsudin, Aizul Fared Mansor, Mohd Erfy Ismail","doi":"10.30880/jtet.2020.12.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In TVET teaching and learning, learners’ collaboration is important to ensure learning effectiveness. However, employing either design thinking or online problem-based learning would not lead to fruitarian. Hence, to devise teaching and learning that employs design thinking (DT) and online problem-based learning (ePBL) pedagogies used in tandem with social media learning environment in Facebook are hypothesized to improve TVET learner’s collaboration. By adopting the Social Constructivism learning theory that social interaction fosters collaborative learning and build learners’ knowledge and understanding, this study is commenced. Social interaction that fosters learners’ collaboration is moderated by type of learners’ self-regulation (SR) towards learning. Previous research hypothesized that ePBL alone only workedeffectively for high self-regulated learners. The learning outcome inequity present due to the pedagogy limitation. This research devises ePBL with DT as a combination of pedagogies that benefits the low SR learners as well. To monitor collaborative learning occurrences, network ties via social media footprints of individual TVET learners is tracked from the learners’ Facebook group. The effectiveness of treatments is monitored using social network analysis i.e. graph theory and centrality concept employing NodeXL software. Samples of 142 TVET pre-service teachers that currently enroll in Design and Technology course at Teachers’ Training Institutes in Malaysia participated in this study. The samples are intact group and classified into high-SR learners and low-SR learners. Social network analysis using Vertices index, Geodesic distance and graph visualization findings show that ePBL with DT works in fostering learning collaboration for both high-SR and low-SR learners. This implies that national e-learning policy and ePBL embeddedness into technical subject is promising, regardless of the type of learners provided that DT is incorporated into the pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":43208,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Technical Education and Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Technical Education and Training","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2020.12.04.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In TVET teaching and learning, learners’ collaboration is important to ensure learning effectiveness. However, employing either design thinking or online problem-based learning would not lead to fruitarian. Hence, to devise teaching and learning that employs design thinking (DT) and online problem-based learning (ePBL) pedagogies used in tandem with social media learning environment in Facebook are hypothesized to improve TVET learner’s collaboration. By adopting the Social Constructivism learning theory that social interaction fosters collaborative learning and build learners’ knowledge and understanding, this study is commenced. Social interaction that fosters learners’ collaboration is moderated by type of learners’ self-regulation (SR) towards learning. Previous research hypothesized that ePBL alone only workedeffectively for high self-regulated learners. The learning outcome inequity present due to the pedagogy limitation. This research devises ePBL with DT as a combination of pedagogies that benefits the low SR learners as well. To monitor collaborative learning occurrences, network ties via social media footprints of individual TVET learners is tracked from the learners’ Facebook group. The effectiveness of treatments is monitored using social network analysis i.e. graph theory and centrality concept employing NodeXL software. Samples of 142 TVET pre-service teachers that currently enroll in Design and Technology course at Teachers’ Training Institutes in Malaysia participated in this study. The samples are intact group and classified into high-SR learners and low-SR learners. Social network analysis using Vertices index, Geodesic distance and graph visualization findings show that ePBL with DT works in fostering learning collaboration for both high-SR and low-SR learners. This implies that national e-learning policy and ePBL embeddedness into technical subject is promising, regardless of the type of learners provided that DT is incorporated into the pedagogy.
社会网络分析——用设计思维检验e-PBL促进协作的有效性——高、低自律学习者的比较
在职业技术教育与培训的教学中,学习者的合作对于确保学习效果至关重要。然而,采用设计思维或基于问题的在线学习都不会带来成果主义。因此,为了设计采用设计思维(DT)和在线问题学习(ePBL)教学法与Facebook中的社交媒体学习环境相结合的教学方法,假设可以提高TVET学习者的协作性。本研究采用社会建构主义学习理论,即社会互动促进合作学习,建立学习者的知识和理解。促进学习者协作的社会互动受学习者对学习的自我调节类型的调节。先前的研究假设,单独的ePBL只对高度自律的学习者有效。由于教育学的局限性,学习结果存在不公平现象。本研究将ePBL与DT结合起来,使低SR学习者也受益。为了监测协作学习的发生,从学习者的Facebook群组中跟踪个人TVET学习者通过社交媒体足迹建立的网络联系。使用社交网络分析监测治疗的有效性,即使用NodeXL软件的图论和中心性概念。目前就读于马来西亚师范学院设计与技术课程的142名TVET职前教师的样本参与了这项研究。样本为完整组,分为高SR学习者和低SR学习者。使用Vertices指数、测地距离和图形可视化结果进行的社交网络分析表明,ePBL与DT在促进高SR和低SR学习者的学习协作方面都很有效。这意味着,无论学习者的类型如何,只要将DT纳入教学法,国家电子学习政策和ePBL嵌入技术科目都是有希望的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Technical Education and Training
Journal of Technical Education and Training EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
12
期刊介绍: JTET will consider for publications original research articles, critical reviews as well as technical reports that can further our understanding of TVET issues and concerns
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信