Social determinants of health in the Human Services: a conceptual model and road map for action

IF 2.3 Q1 SOCIAL WORK

Journal of Progressive Human Services Pub Date : 2018-07-17 DOI:10.1080/10428232.2018.1467171

A. Spector

引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Social Determinants of Health Framework is well known as a reliable way to understand and predict poor health outcomes and health inequities among individuals who are disproportionately impacted by poverty, discrimination, residential segregation, and other social problems. Since becoming recognized by the public health profession as key to addressing the root causes of poor health among these individuals, integration of social determinants of health (SDOH) interventions in the health-care industry has become a national and global priority. This essay offers a theoretical and practical explanation of the integration of the SDOH in the Human Services by proposing key recommendations and strategies for Human Services Organizations (HSOs) and providers to implement new practices, policies, and research methods that may ameliorate the conditions that create inequities in health.

查看原文本刊更多论文

人类服务中健康的社会决定因素：概念模型和行动路线图

众所周知，健康的社会决定因素框架是一种可靠的方法，可以理解和预测受贫困、歧视、居住隔离和其他社会问题不成比例影响的个人的不良健康结果和健康不平等。由于公共卫生专业认识到这是解决这些人健康状况不佳的根本原因的关键，将健康的社会决定因素干预措施纳入卫生保健行业已成为国家和全球的优先事项。本文通过提出关键建议和战略，为人类服务组织(hso)和提供者实施新的实践、政策和研究方法提供了理论和实践上的解释，以改善造成健康不平等的条件。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Progressive Human Services SOCIAL WORK-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The only journal of its kind in the United States, the Journal of Progressive Human Services covers political, social, personal, and professional problems in human services from a progressive perspective. The journal stimulates debate about major social issues and contributes to the development of the analytical tools needed for building a caring society based on equality and justice. The journal"s contributors examine oppressed and vulnerable groups, struggles by workers and clients on the job and in the community, dilemmas of practice in conservative contexts, and strategies for ending racism, sexism, ageism, heterosexism, and discrimination of persons who are disabled and psychologically distressed.