COMPARATIVE STUDIES BETWEEN A FACIAL RECOGNITION SYSTEM AND A FINGERPRINT RECOGNITION SYSTEM FOR ACCESS CONTROL

Bopatriciat BOLUMA MANGATA, Dominique Ilunga N’kashama, Parfum Bukanga Christian, Donatien Kadima Muamba
{"title":"COMPARATIVE STUDIES BETWEEN A FACIAL RECOGNITION SYSTEM AND A FINGERPRINT RECOGNITION SYSTEM FOR ACCESS CONTROL","authors":"Bopatriciat BOLUMA MANGATA, Dominique Ilunga N’kashama, Parfum Bukanga Christian, Donatien Kadima Muamba","doi":"10.56327/ijiscs.v6i2.1237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the decisions made on two singles modal biometric systems based on facial recognition and fingerprints for access control. In order to carry out this study on the access control system based on fingerprint and facial recognition, we made biometric recognition systems based on fingerprints and facial recognition that interacts with an embedded system under Arduino to give us the possibility to assemble the performances of programming and electronics, more precisely, we programmed electronic systems for the automatic opening of doors without the action of a human being. In a sample of one hundred individuals composed of 40 females and 60 males, 75 of whom were enrolled and 25 of whom were not, our two singles modal access control systems each obtained the following results: 70 true positives, 5 false negatives, 8 false positives and 17 true negatives for the facial recognition system, compared to 73 true positives, 2 false negatives, 4 false positives and 21 true negatives for the fingerprint recognition system, which constitute our confusion matrix. From all the tests carried out, we can say that the decisions made by the fingerprint recognition system are better than the decisions made by the facial recognition system.","PeriodicalId":32370,"journal":{"name":"IJISCS International Journal of Information System and Computer Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJISCS International Journal of Information System and Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56327/ijiscs.v6i2.1237","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the decisions made on two singles modal biometric systems based on facial recognition and fingerprints for access control. In order to carry out this study on the access control system based on fingerprint and facial recognition, we made biometric recognition systems based on fingerprints and facial recognition that interacts with an embedded system under Arduino to give us the possibility to assemble the performances of programming and electronics, more precisely, we programmed electronic systems for the automatic opening of doors without the action of a human being. In a sample of one hundred individuals composed of 40 females and 60 males, 75 of whom were enrolled and 25 of whom were not, our two singles modal access control systems each obtained the following results: 70 true positives, 5 false negatives, 8 false positives and 17 true negatives for the facial recognition system, compared to 73 true positives, 2 false negatives, 4 false positives and 21 true negatives for the fingerprint recognition system, which constitute our confusion matrix. From all the tests carried out, we can say that the decisions made by the fingerprint recognition system are better than the decisions made by the facial recognition system.
门禁中人脸识别系统与指纹识别系统的比较研究
本文研究了基于人脸识别和指纹识别的两种单模态生物识别系统的门禁决策问题。为了对基于指纹和面部识别的门禁系统进行研究,我们制作了基于指纹和面部识别的生物识别系统,并与Arduino下的嵌入式系统进行交互,使我们有可能将编程和电子学的性能结合在一起,更准确地说,我们编写了电子系统,实现了不需要人工操作的自动开门。在由40名女性和60名男性组成的100个人样本中,75名被登记,25名未登记,我们的两个单模式门禁系统分别获得了以下结果:面部识别系统的70个真阳性,5个假阴性,8个假阳性和17个真阴性,而指纹识别系统的73个真阳性,2个假阴性,4个假阳性和21个真阴性,这构成了我们的混淆矩阵。从所进行的所有测试中,我们可以说指纹识别系统做出的决策比面部识别系统做出的决策更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信