Romanticism, Skepticism, Liberalism: Reading Isaiah Berlin

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
James G. Mellon
{"title":"Romanticism, Skepticism, Liberalism: Reading Isaiah Berlin","authors":"James G. Mellon","doi":"10.1080/10848770.2022.2157315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The aim of this article is neither to challenge nor to defend Isaiah Berlin’s thought but rather to identify the main influences on his concept of liberalism. Berlin’s justification for liberalism is distinctive in that it reflects influences of Romanticism and Augustinianism. Unlike some liberals, his liberalism does not reflect unambiguous confidence in the products of the Enlightenment. Berlin valued the freedom of expression and identity, yet he feared that these freedoms faced potential threats from both left and right. These considerations led Berlin to found his liberalism on the notion of limited government, as is reflected in his bias towards negative, rather than positive, liberty. Negative liberty implies restraint on the part of the state in order to limit anything that might act as an impediment to individual freedom. In contrast, positive liberty implies that the state may have to be active even to the point of imposing restrictions on individual freedom in order to ameliorate effective limits on liberty imposed as a consequence of societal inequities. Berlin is justly deemed to have been one of the great political theorists of the twentieth century. Few, even among his critics, would deny this, and even those who disagree with Berlin’s conclusions would acknowledge that his framing of the questions and his references to history have elevated and enriched the debate on liberalism.","PeriodicalId":55962,"journal":{"name":"European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2022.2157315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT The aim of this article is neither to challenge nor to defend Isaiah Berlin’s thought but rather to identify the main influences on his concept of liberalism. Berlin’s justification for liberalism is distinctive in that it reflects influences of Romanticism and Augustinianism. Unlike some liberals, his liberalism does not reflect unambiguous confidence in the products of the Enlightenment. Berlin valued the freedom of expression and identity, yet he feared that these freedoms faced potential threats from both left and right. These considerations led Berlin to found his liberalism on the notion of limited government, as is reflected in his bias towards negative, rather than positive, liberty. Negative liberty implies restraint on the part of the state in order to limit anything that might act as an impediment to individual freedom. In contrast, positive liberty implies that the state may have to be active even to the point of imposing restrictions on individual freedom in order to ameliorate effective limits on liberty imposed as a consequence of societal inequities. Berlin is justly deemed to have been one of the great political theorists of the twentieth century. Few, even among his critics, would deny this, and even those who disagree with Berlin’s conclusions would acknowledge that his framing of the questions and his references to history have elevated and enriched the debate on liberalism.
浪漫主义、怀疑主义、自由主义——读以赛亚·伯林
摘要本文的目的不是要对以赛亚·伯林的思想提出质疑,也不是要为其辩护,而是要找出对其自由主义思想的主要影响。柏林为自由主义辩护的独特之处在于它反映了浪漫主义和奥古斯丁主义的影响。与一些自由主义者不同,他的自由主义并没有反映出对启蒙运动产物的明确信心。柏林重视言论和身份自由,但他担心这些自由面临来自左翼和右翼的潜在威胁。这些考虑导致柏林在有限政府的概念上找到了他的自由主义,这反映在他对消极而非积极自由的偏见上。消极自由意味着国家方面的克制,以限制任何可能阻碍个人自由的行为。相比之下,积极的自由意味着国家可能必须积极主动,甚至对个人自由施加限制,以改善由于社会不平等而对自由施加的有效限制。柏林被认为是二十世纪最伟大的政治理论家之一。即使在他的批评者中,也很少有人会否认这一点,即使是那些不同意柏林结论的人也会承认,他对问题的阐述和对历史的引用提升并丰富了关于自由主义的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms
European Legacy-Toward New Paradigms HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
97
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信